Glycaemic index and glycaemic load of selected packaged vegan foods.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1111/nbu.12692
Aylin Bayindir Gümüş, Alev Keser, Murat Gökgöz, Aşkın Güngüneş
{"title":"Glycaemic index and glycaemic load of selected packaged vegan foods.","authors":"Aylin Bayindir Gümüş, Alev Keser, Murat Gökgöz, Aşkın Güngüneş","doi":"10.1111/nbu.12692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While there are data regarding the glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) of many foods in the literature, the values for packaged vegan analogue foods have not been previously published, although processed vegan foods usually contain more carbohydrates than their animal-based counterparts. This study was carried out to determine the GI and GL values of a selection of packaged vegan foods popular in Türkiye. To determine the GI and GL of test foods, 12 healthy volunteer females participated in the study. Participants randomly consumed test and reference foods (glucose and white bread) on each trial day, and capillary blood glucose was measured at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 mins in duplicate. The GIs of vegan schnitzel, vegan chickpea burger, vegan mince pita, vegan chocolate, vegan snack bar and vegan cheese were 26.1 ± 19.61 (low), 27.1 ± 17.21 (low), 65.1 ± 28.60 (moderate), 42.7 ± 22.32 (low), 63.6 ± 45.86 (moderate), 36.4 ± 16.85 (low), respectively, according to the glucose reference, and were 28.2 ± 16.17 (low), 34.7 ± 18.26 (low), 81.2 ± 31.96 (high), 48.8 ± 12.87 (low), 82.0 ± 54.05 (high), 46.7 ± 28.66 (low), respectively, according to the white bread reference. GLs were 3.5 ± 2.66 (low), 8.6 ± 5.46 (low), 26.6 ± 11.67 (high), 6.1 ± 3.19 (low), 14.2 ± 10.28 (moderate), 5.7 ± 2.63 (low), respectively, according to the glucose reference, and were 3.8 ± 2.19 (low), 11.0 ± 5.80 (moderate), 33.1 ± 13.04 (high), 7.0 ± 1.84 (low), 18.4 ± 12.12 (moderate), 7.3 ± 4.47 (low), respectively, according to the white bread reference. The data from this study provide preliminary data for the GIs and GLs of packaged and processed vegan foods and show that the GIs and GLs of meat and cheese vegan analogues, while still low or moderate, tend to be higher than their animal-based counterparts which have lower or no glycaemic responses. Further research on the GIs and GLs of more vegan foods is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48536,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"372-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While there are data regarding the glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) of many foods in the literature, the values for packaged vegan analogue foods have not been previously published, although processed vegan foods usually contain more carbohydrates than their animal-based counterparts. This study was carried out to determine the GI and GL values of a selection of packaged vegan foods popular in Türkiye. To determine the GI and GL of test foods, 12 healthy volunteer females participated in the study. Participants randomly consumed test and reference foods (glucose and white bread) on each trial day, and capillary blood glucose was measured at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 mins in duplicate. The GIs of vegan schnitzel, vegan chickpea burger, vegan mince pita, vegan chocolate, vegan snack bar and vegan cheese were 26.1 ± 19.61 (low), 27.1 ± 17.21 (low), 65.1 ± 28.60 (moderate), 42.7 ± 22.32 (low), 63.6 ± 45.86 (moderate), 36.4 ± 16.85 (low), respectively, according to the glucose reference, and were 28.2 ± 16.17 (low), 34.7 ± 18.26 (low), 81.2 ± 31.96 (high), 48.8 ± 12.87 (low), 82.0 ± 54.05 (high), 46.7 ± 28.66 (low), respectively, according to the white bread reference. GLs were 3.5 ± 2.66 (low), 8.6 ± 5.46 (low), 26.6 ± 11.67 (high), 6.1 ± 3.19 (low), 14.2 ± 10.28 (moderate), 5.7 ± 2.63 (low), respectively, according to the glucose reference, and were 3.8 ± 2.19 (low), 11.0 ± 5.80 (moderate), 33.1 ± 13.04 (high), 7.0 ± 1.84 (low), 18.4 ± 12.12 (moderate), 7.3 ± 4.47 (low), respectively, according to the white bread reference. The data from this study provide preliminary data for the GIs and GLs of packaged and processed vegan foods and show that the GIs and GLs of meat and cheese vegan analogues, while still low or moderate, tend to be higher than their animal-based counterparts which have lower or no glycaemic responses. Further research on the GIs and GLs of more vegan foods is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
部分包装素食食品的血糖生成指数和血糖负荷。
虽然文献中有关于许多食品的血糖指数(GI)和血糖负荷(GL)的数据,但包装素食类似食品的血糖指数和血糖负荷值此前尚未公布,尽管加工素食食品通常比动物性食品含有更多的碳水化合物。本研究旨在确定在土耳其流行的精选包装素食食品的 GI 和 GL 值。为了确定测试食品的 GI 和 GL 值,12 名健康的女性志愿者参与了这项研究。参与者在每个试验日随机食用试验食品和参考食品(葡萄糖和白面包),并在基线、15、30、45、60、90 和 120 分钟测量毛细血管血糖,测量结果一式两份。素食炸肉排、素食鹰嘴豆汉堡、素食肉馅皮塔饼、素食巧克力、素食点心棒和素食奶酪的 GI 分别为 26.1 ± 19.61(低)、27.1 ± 17.21(低)、65.1 ± 28.60(中)、42.7 ± 22.32(低)、63.6 ± 45.86(中)、36.4 ± 16.根据葡萄糖参考值,分别为 28.2 ± 16.17(低)、34.7 ± 18.26(低)、81.2 ± 31.96(高)、48.8 ± 12.87(低)、82.0 ± 54.05(高)、46.7 ± 28.66(低)。葡萄糖参考值分别为 3.5 ± 2.66(低)、8.6 ± 5.46(低)、26.6 ± 11.67(高)、6.1 ± 3.19(低)、14.2 ± 10.28(中等)、5.7 ± 2.63(低),白面包参考值分别为 3.8 ± 2.19(低)、11.0 ± 5.80(中)、33.1 ± 13.04(高)、7.0 ± 1.84(低)、18.4 ± 12.12(中)、7.3 ± 4.47(低)。这项研究的数据为包装和加工素食食品的 GIs 和 GLs 提供了初步数据,并表明肉类和奶酪类素食食品的 GIs 和 GLs 虽然仍然较低或适中,但往往高于动物性食品,因为动物性食品的血糖反应较低或没有血糖反应。需要对更多素食食品的 GIs 和 GLs 进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Bulletin
Nutrition Bulletin NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Nutrition Bulletin provides accessible reviews at the cutting edge of research. Read by researchers and nutritionists working in universities and research institutes; public health nutritionists, dieticians and other health professionals; nutritionists, technologists and others in the food industry; those engaged in higher education including students; and journalists with an interest in nutrition.
期刊最新文献
Benefits and challenges associated with 'raising our daily pulses'. Evidence-based food serving size labelling: Survey and laboratory analyses of consumer cooking spray usage. Cooking and food skills and their relationship with adherence to the Mediterranean diet in young adults attending university: A cross-sectional study from Türkiye. The relationship between dietary sugar consumption and anxiety disorders: A systematic review. Reference growth curves of anthropometric markers in Brazilian children and adolescents aged 7-14 years from southern Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1