Myological and osteological approaches to gape and bite force reconstruction in Smilodon fatalis.

4区 医学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Anatomical Record Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1002/ar.25529
Ashley R Deutsch, Arin Berger, Lara L Martens, Benjamin R Witt, Rachel L J Smith, Adam Hartstone-Rose
{"title":"Myological and osteological approaches to gape and bite force reconstruction in Smilodon fatalis.","authors":"Ashley R Deutsch, Arin Berger, Lara L Martens, Benjamin R Witt, Rachel L J Smith, Adam Hartstone-Rose","doi":"10.1002/ar.25529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Masticatory gape and bite force are important behavioral and ecological variables. While much has been written about the highly derived masticatory anatomy of Smilodon fatalis, there remains a great deal of debate about their masticatory behaviors. To that end, we establish osteological proxies for masticatory adductor fascicle length (FL) based on extant felids and apply these along with previously validated techniques to S. fatalis to provide estimates of fascicle lengths, maximum osteological gapes, and bite force. While the best correlated FL proxies in extant felids do not predict particularly long fascicles, these proxies may be of value for less morphologically distinct felids. A slightly less well correlated proxy predicts a temporalis FL 15% longer than that of Panthera tigris. While angular maximum bony gape is significantly larger in S. fatalis than it is in extant felids, linear gape at the canine tip and carnassial notch were not significantly different from those of extant felids. Finally, we produce anatomical bite force estimates of 1283.74 N at the canine and 4671.41 N at the carnassial, which are similar in magnitude to estimates not of the largest felids but of the much smaller P. onca, with S. fatalis producing slightly less force at the canines and more at the carnassials. These estimates align with previous predictions that S. fatalis may have killed large prey with canine shearing bites produced, in part, by force contributions of the postcranial muscles.</p>","PeriodicalId":50793,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.25529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Masticatory gape and bite force are important behavioral and ecological variables. While much has been written about the highly derived masticatory anatomy of Smilodon fatalis, there remains a great deal of debate about their masticatory behaviors. To that end, we establish osteological proxies for masticatory adductor fascicle length (FL) based on extant felids and apply these along with previously validated techniques to S. fatalis to provide estimates of fascicle lengths, maximum osteological gapes, and bite force. While the best correlated FL proxies in extant felids do not predict particularly long fascicles, these proxies may be of value for less morphologically distinct felids. A slightly less well correlated proxy predicts a temporalis FL 15% longer than that of Panthera tigris. While angular maximum bony gape is significantly larger in S. fatalis than it is in extant felids, linear gape at the canine tip and carnassial notch were not significantly different from those of extant felids. Finally, we produce anatomical bite force estimates of 1283.74 N at the canine and 4671.41 N at the carnassial, which are similar in magnitude to estimates not of the largest felids but of the much smaller P. onca, with S. fatalis producing slightly less force at the canines and more at the carnassials. These estimates align with previous predictions that S. fatalis may have killed large prey with canine shearing bites produced, in part, by force contributions of the postcranial muscles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用肌肉学和骨学方法重建Smilodon fatalis的咬合和咬合力。
咀嚼间隙和咬合力是重要的行为和生态变量。虽然关于Smilodon fatalis高度衍生的咀嚼解剖学已经有了很多论述,但关于它们的咀嚼行为仍然存在大量争论。为此,我们以现存的猫科动物为基础,建立了咀嚼内收肌筋膜长度(FL)的骨学近似值,并将这些近似值与先前验证过的技术一起应用于S. fatalis,以提供筋膜长度、最大骨学间隙和咬合力的估计值。虽然现生猫科动物中相关性最好的FL替代物并不能预测特别长的筋膜,但这些替代物可能对形态不太明显的猫科动物有价值。一个相关性稍差的代用指标预测的颞肌FL比虎豹的长15%。虽然S. fatalis的角部最大骨间隙明显大于现生的猫科动物,但犬齿顶端和肉颊切迹的线性间隙与现生猫科动物没有明显差异。最后,我们得出的犬齿咬合力估计值为 1283.74 牛顿,肉窦咬合力估计值为 4671.41 牛顿,这与体型最大的猫科动物的估计值相近,但与体型小得多的猫科动物的估计值相近,其中致命猫科动物的犬齿咬合力稍小,肉窦咬合力稍大。这些估计值与之前的预测相吻合,即凶猛豹可能是通过犬齿的剪切咬合杀死大型猎物的,这部分是通过颅后肌肉的力量产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Record
Anatomical Record Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Anatomical Record
期刊最新文献
Biomechanical modeling of musculoskeletal function related to the terrestrial locomotion of Riojasuchus tenuisceps (Archosauria: Ornithosuchidae). A new Peirosauridae (Crocodyliformes, Notosuchia) from the Adamantina Formation (Bauru Group, Late Cretaceous), with a revised phylogenetic analysis of Sebecia. Endocranial anatomy and phylogenetic position of the crocodylian Eosuchus lerichei from the late Paleocene of northwestern Europe and potential adaptations for transoceanic dispersal in gavialoids. Palaeohistology of Macrospondylus bollensis (Crocodylomorpha: Thalattosuchia: Teleosauroidea) from the Posidonienschiefer Formation (Toarcian) of Germany, with insights into life history and ecology. Anatomy and ontogeny of the "carnivorous aetosaur": New information on Coahomasuchus kahleorum (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) from the Upper Triassic Dockum Group of Texas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1