首页 > 最新文献

Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology最新文献

英文 中文
An identity for the inscrutable Homo habilis 神秘的能人的身份。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1002/ar.70145
Ian Tattersall
<p>By dint of incessant repetition, the species name <i>Homo habilis</i> has become firmly entrenched in the paleoanthropological lexicon. But what exactly does it denote? While the question is obvious, it has long been tricky to answer, because until recently most of us would have been hard put to come up with a satisfactory morphological (or indeed any other) definition for a species that has accreted new putative members over time as a matter of default, rather than of morphological coherence. The resulting difficulty of definition has actually been with us since the very beginning, because when Louis Leakey, Philip Tobias, and John Napier came up with the “handy man” moniker some 62 years ago (Leakey et al., <span>1964</span>), they applied it to a rather miscellaneous assortment of dental and postcranial fossils from a variety of stratigraphic levels in Beds I and II at Tanzania's Olduvai Gorge that they grouped together, not on the basis of shared and unique apomorphies or even of firm taphonomic association, but instead to acknowledge Leakey's doctrinaire fealty to the notion of “Man the Toolmaker.” At the time, the venerable idea that humankind was defined by a behavior, the manufacture of tools, rather than by any morphological attribute(s), had recently been reinvigorated by Kenneth Oakley at book length (Oakley, <span>1961</span>); and it was also, of course, deeply implicit in the choice of <i>Homo</i> as the genus of the Olduvai fossils. The discovery of OH7 and the other gracile fossils arbitrarily bundled into <i>Homo habilis</i> had actually come as an enormous relief to Leakey, following as it did a brief but unnerving period during which the uncomfortably “robust” OH5, nicknamed “Nutcracker Man” on account of its flat and enormous molar teeth, was the only obvious candidate for manufacturer of the Mode 1 tools that eroded out in abundance from the lowest strata of the Gorge.</p><p>Yet, as Pilbeam and Simons (<span>1965</span>) were quick to point out, the Bed I and lower Bed II Olduvai hominins attributed to <i>Homo habilis</i> represented a substantial variety in both age and morphology; and there was in addition widespread muttering to the effect that not enough “morphological space” existed between the new dental materials from Tanzania and the long-established South African <i>Australopithecus africanus</i> to admit the new taxon (see Tattersall, <span>2009</span>). As a result of such uncertainties it was not until after the discovery, in Kenya's East Turkana region, of the cranium KNM-ER 1470 (Leakey, <span>1973</span>) that discussion finally tilted in favor of <i>Homo habilis</i> as a real biological entity to be reckoned with—although the notion that ER 1470 represented a distinctive species of the genus <i>Homo</i> was basically driven by a new imperative: an endocranial volume considerably in excess of anything known from lower Olduvai.</p><p>Subsequent putative accretions to <i>Homo habilis</i> have included such can
由于不断的重复,能人这个物种的名字已经在古人类学词汇中牢固地确立下来。但它究竟表示什么呢?虽然这个问题很明显,但长期以来一直难以回答,因为直到最近,我们大多数人都很难对一个物种提出一个令人满意的形态学(或任何其他)定义,这个物种随着时间的推移而默认地增加了新的假定成员,而不是形态学上的一致性。由此产生的定义困难实际上从一开始就伴随着我们,因为大约62年前,当路易斯·利基、菲利普·托比亚斯和约翰·纳皮尔提出“手手人”这个绰号时(利基等人,1964年),他们把这个词用在了坦桑尼亚奥杜瓦伊峡谷1层和2层不同地层的牙齿和后颅化石上,这些化石被他们组合在一起。不是基于共同和独特的拟形,甚至不是基于牢固的语音学联系,而是为了承认利基对“工具制造者”这一概念的教条主义忠诚。当时,人类是由一种行为和工具的制造来定义的,而不是由任何形态属性来定义的这个古老的观点,最近被肯尼斯·奥克利(Kenneth Oakley)以书的长度重新振兴了(Oakley, 1961);当然,这也深深地隐含在奥杜瓦伊化石选择人属的原因中。OH7和其他被随意归类为能人的柔韧化石的发现,实际上让利基松了一口气。在此之前,他经历了一段短暂而令人不安的时期。在这段时期里,令人不安的“强壮”OH5,由于其扁平而巨大的臼齿,被戏称为“胡桃夹子人”,是唯一一个明显的候选者,可以制造从峡谷最下层大量侵蚀出来的第一种工具。然而,正如Pilbeam和Simons(1965)很快指出的那样,归属于能人的I层和下II层奥杜瓦伊人族在年龄和形态上都有很大的差异;此外,人们普遍抱怨说,来自坦桑尼亚的新牙齿材料与长期存在的南非非洲南方古猿之间没有足够的“形态空间”来容纳新的分类单元(见Tattersall, 2009)。由于这些不确定性,直到在肯尼亚东图尔卡纳地区发现了头盖骨KNM-ER 1470 (Leakey, 1973)之后,讨论才最终倾向于将能人作为一个真正的生物实体来考虑——尽管ER 1470代表了人属的一个独特物种的概念基本上是由一个新的必要因素驱动的:颅内体积大大超过了从奥杜瓦伊下游已知的任何物种。随后被推测为能人的增加包括诸如东图尔卡纳颅骨KNM-ER 1813 (Howell, 1978),奥杜瓦伊和东图尔卡纳骨骼的碎片OH 62和ER 3735 (Johanson等人,1987;Leakey等人,1989),奥杜瓦伊和哈达尔腭OH 65和NME-AL 666 (Clarke, 2012; Rak等人,1996),埃塞俄比亚LD 350-1 Ledi-Geraru部分下颌骨(Spoor等人,2015),以及南非Stw 53头盖骨(Hughes & Tobias, 1977)。这种杂七杂八的分类在形态、年龄和所代表的身体部位上都有显著的差异,这使能人成为一个可疑的异质和长寿的次等人(大约2.8-1.6 Ma)。当路易斯·利基和他的同事们将这个物种命名为能人时,他们将那些被归类为OH7的化石指定为全型化石。这些包括“Olduvai床I . f.l.k.n.n.i.遗址中一只幼年个体的带有牙列的下颌骨和相关的上臼齿、顶骨和手骨”(Leakey etal ., 1964,第8页)。令人困惑的是,其他I层和下II层标本被命名为异型;但是根据命名法的规则,任何对能人牙齿的归属都必须通过与OH7保存完好的下牙列的比较来确定(图1)。直到2019年,东非的记录中并没有太多可以进行这种密切比较的东西;但在那一年,Grine等人(2019年)报告说,从肯尼亚东图尔卡纳Ileret的2.02 Ma沉积物中恢复了一系列孤立的牙齿,这些牙齿似乎代表了一个被命名为KNM-ER 64060的年轻古人类个体的完整下牙列(图1)。Grine等人(2019年)在最初的报告中(以及对能人构成的困难的含蓄承认),简单地将这些牙齿归为“早期智人”,并指出,整体牙冠大小和前磨牙和磨牙的各种细节使ER 64060与“早期智人”群体一致,而不是与更微小的智人和局部稍晚的直立人(= ergaster智人)。 他们还观察到,这些孤立的牙齿是在一个地平线上发现的,这个地平线上还发现了“一系列可能与牙列有关的颅后骨骼”,尽管“它们在遗址表面的分离留下了一些怀疑的余地”(Grine et al., 2019,第152页)。Grine和他的合著者现在已经明确承认ER 64060牙齿是能人的牙齿,从而澄清了他们最初的解释(Grine et al., 2026)。它们只是为这一分类学上的移动提供了粗略的理由,但毫无疑问,OH7和ER 64060牙齿在大小和比例上的相似之处(图1)强烈表明,大致同时期的Olduvai和Ileret材料确实代表了同一物种的个体,根据定义,能人。同样重要的是,Grine及其同事还提供了令人信服的地球化学和地貌学证据,以支持ER 64060牙齿与附近发现的部分人族骨骼的联系,并给予标识符ER-64061(参见Present et al., 2024)。尽管主要局限于上肢(不包括手)和骨盆的部分,但64061骨骼比其他很少且高度碎片化的头盖骨告诉我们更多关于能人的信息,因此证明了Grine和合著者的说法,即ER 64060/64061组合“很可能不仅代表了最完整的早期人的头盖骨,也是最古老的”(Grine et al., 2026)。Grine和他的同事们对er64061进行了细致而精美的描述和比较(其中适当地承认了它的不完整性在诸如估计身体比例等练习中带来的许多不确定性),从许多方面证实并扩展了早期对假定的能人后颅骨化石的分析结果。Johanson等人(1987)描述了他们认为属于能人的高度碎片化的Olduvai OH 62骨架与埃塞俄比亚的阿法南方古猿“Lucy”NME A.L. 288-1骨架非常相似,尽管前肢更强壮,甚至更长,其比例让人想起非洲猿。同样,Haeusler和McHenry(2007)发现,er3735的部分骨骼,也被认为是能人的,具有类似黑猩猩的臂部比例,比南方古猿阿法种的前臂更长更强壮。Grine和他的同事现在报告说,ER 64061个体的手臂可能也有类似的情况,“相对于下肢的大小,它的上肢可能相对较长”(Grine et al., 2026)。当作者将这一发现与颅后骨骼其他部分的线索结合在一起时,一幅能人的肖像出现了,这幅肖像对于一个被认为是我们自己属的成员来说是非常古老的,这与我们在图尔卡纳西部Nariokotome发现的约1.6 Ma WT 15000骨架形成了很大的对比,后者现在被认为是ergaster(即“早期非洲直立人”)的主要样本。这个物种最初是根据来自Ileret的一个独特的、有点年轻的有牙列的下颌骨(ER 992)命名的;而且,与ER 64061形成鲜明对比的是,nariokoome骨骼显示出广泛的现代肢体比例。Grine和他的同事们认为,ER 64061的上半身很像南方古猿,至少在保存完好的部分是这样;尽管他们断言该个体的“下肢力学”“更像人而不是南方古猿”(Grine et al., 2026),但支持这一说法的主要证据是一个小的坐骨碎片,它“与该化石的人属(参见KNM-WT 15000)一致,只是因为它不同于南方古猿的坐骨(
{"title":"An identity for the inscrutable Homo habilis","authors":"Ian Tattersall","doi":"10.1002/ar.70145","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70145","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;By dint of incessant repetition, the species name &lt;i&gt;Homo habilis&lt;/i&gt; has become firmly entrenched in the paleoanthropological lexicon. But what exactly does it denote? While the question is obvious, it has long been tricky to answer, because until recently most of us would have been hard put to come up with a satisfactory morphological (or indeed any other) definition for a species that has accreted new putative members over time as a matter of default, rather than of morphological coherence. The resulting difficulty of definition has actually been with us since the very beginning, because when Louis Leakey, Philip Tobias, and John Napier came up with the “handy man” moniker some 62 years ago (Leakey et al., &lt;span&gt;1964&lt;/span&gt;), they applied it to a rather miscellaneous assortment of dental and postcranial fossils from a variety of stratigraphic levels in Beds I and II at Tanzania's Olduvai Gorge that they grouped together, not on the basis of shared and unique apomorphies or even of firm taphonomic association, but instead to acknowledge Leakey's doctrinaire fealty to the notion of “Man the Toolmaker.” At the time, the venerable idea that humankind was defined by a behavior, the manufacture of tools, rather than by any morphological attribute(s), had recently been reinvigorated by Kenneth Oakley at book length (Oakley, &lt;span&gt;1961&lt;/span&gt;); and it was also, of course, deeply implicit in the choice of &lt;i&gt;Homo&lt;/i&gt; as the genus of the Olduvai fossils. The discovery of OH7 and the other gracile fossils arbitrarily bundled into &lt;i&gt;Homo habilis&lt;/i&gt; had actually come as an enormous relief to Leakey, following as it did a brief but unnerving period during which the uncomfortably “robust” OH5, nicknamed “Nutcracker Man” on account of its flat and enormous molar teeth, was the only obvious candidate for manufacturer of the Mode 1 tools that eroded out in abundance from the lowest strata of the Gorge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yet, as Pilbeam and Simons (&lt;span&gt;1965&lt;/span&gt;) were quick to point out, the Bed I and lower Bed II Olduvai hominins attributed to &lt;i&gt;Homo habilis&lt;/i&gt; represented a substantial variety in both age and morphology; and there was in addition widespread muttering to the effect that not enough “morphological space” existed between the new dental materials from Tanzania and the long-established South African &lt;i&gt;Australopithecus africanus&lt;/i&gt; to admit the new taxon (see Tattersall, &lt;span&gt;2009&lt;/span&gt;). As a result of such uncertainties it was not until after the discovery, in Kenya's East Turkana region, of the cranium KNM-ER 1470 (Leakey, &lt;span&gt;1973&lt;/span&gt;) that discussion finally tilted in favor of &lt;i&gt;Homo habilis&lt;/i&gt; as a real biological entity to be reckoned with—although the notion that ER 1470 represented a distinctive species of the genus &lt;i&gt;Homo&lt;/i&gt; was basically driven by a new imperative: an endocranial volume considerably in excess of anything known from lower Olduvai.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Subsequent putative accretions to &lt;i&gt;Homo habilis&lt;/i&gt; have included such can","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 3","pages":"546-549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.70145","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New partial skeleton of Homo habilis from the upper Burgi Member, Koobi Fora Formation, Ileret, Kenya 肯尼亚Ileret Koobi Fora组Burgi上段能人部分新骨架。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1002/ar.70100
Frederick E. Grine, Deming Yang, Ashley S. Hammond, William L. Jungers, Michael R. Lague, Carrie S. Mongle, Osbjorn M. Pearson, Meave G. Leakey, Louise N. Leakey

KNM-ER 64061 is a partial skeleton from the upper Burgi Member of the Koobi Fora Formation (2.02–2.06 Ma) associated taphonomically and geochemically with a nearly complete mandibular dentition (KNM-ER 64060) attributed to Homo habilis. The skeleton comprises the clavicle, scapular fragments, both humeri, both ulnae, both radii, and a fragmentary sacrum and os coxae, making this the most complete H. habilis skeleton recovered thus far. The upper limb elements are similar to those of other early Homo specimens. Notably, the humerus is slender with a weakly-projecting lateral epicondyle, a relatively wide capitulum and a narrow trochlea, and the ulna has a relatively large radial notch. Although KNM-ER 64061 does not preserve a lower limb, limited features of the ischium suggest lower limb mechanics more similar to Homo than to australopiths. Brachial index estimates support previous conclusions that H. habilis had a relatively long forearm compared to Homo erectus. All upper limb elements possess strikingly thick cortices, resembling the condition in australopiths and other early Homo fossils. The stature estimate of 160 cm based on humeral length is intermediate between those for H. habilis (OH 62, KNM-ER 3735) and H. erectus (KNM-ER 1808, KNM-WT 15000). The body mass estimate of 30.7–32.7 kg is slightly lower than other H. habilis specimens and noticeably lower than estimates for H. erectus. KNM-ER 64061 indicates that H. habilis retained more primitive proportions and was smaller in stature and mass than H. erectus.

KNM-ER 64061是来自Koobi Fora组(2.02-2.06 Ma) Burgi上段的部分骨骼,在地理和地球化学上与一个几乎完整的下颌齿(KNM-ER 64060)属于能人。这具骨架包括锁骨、肩胛骨碎片、肱骨、尺骨、桡骨以及骶骨和尾骨碎片,这是迄今为止发现的最完整的能人骨架。上肢元素与其他早期人属标本相似。值得注意的是,肱骨纤细,外上髁弱突出,肱骨头较宽,滑车较窄,尺骨桡骨切迹较大。虽然KNM-ER 64061没有保存下肢,但坐骨的有限特征表明下肢力学更类似于人而不是南方古猿。肱指数估计支持先前的结论,即与直立人相比,能人的前臂相对较长。所有上肢元素都拥有惊人的厚皮层,类似于南方古猿和其他早期人属化石的情况。根据肱骨长度估计的160厘米的身高介于能人(OH 62, KNM-ER 3735)和直立人(KNM-ER 1808, KNM-WT 15000)之间。30.7-32.7公斤的体重估计略低于其他能人标本,明显低于直立人标本。KNM-ER 64061表明,能人比直立人保留了更原始的比例,身材和质量都更小。
{"title":"New partial skeleton of Homo habilis from the upper Burgi Member, Koobi Fora Formation, Ileret, Kenya","authors":"Frederick E. Grine,&nbsp;Deming Yang,&nbsp;Ashley S. Hammond,&nbsp;William L. Jungers,&nbsp;Michael R. Lague,&nbsp;Carrie S. Mongle,&nbsp;Osbjorn M. Pearson,&nbsp;Meave G. Leakey,&nbsp;Louise N. Leakey","doi":"10.1002/ar.70100","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70100","url":null,"abstract":"<p>KNM-ER 64061 is a partial skeleton from the upper Burgi Member of the Koobi Fora Formation (2.02–2.06 Ma) associated taphonomically and geochemically with a nearly complete mandibular dentition (KNM-ER 64060) attributed to <i>Homo habilis</i>. The skeleton comprises the clavicle, scapular fragments, both humeri, both ulnae, both radii, and a fragmentary sacrum and os coxae, making this the most complete <i>H. habilis</i> skeleton recovered thus far. The upper limb elements are similar to those of other early <i>Homo</i> specimens. Notably, the humerus is slender with a weakly-projecting lateral epicondyle, a relatively wide capitulum and a narrow trochlea, and the ulna has a relatively large radial notch. Although KNM-ER 64061 does not preserve a lower limb, limited features of the ischium suggest lower limb mechanics more similar to <i>Homo</i> than to australopiths. Brachial index estimates support previous conclusions that <i>H. habilis</i> had a relatively long forearm compared to <i>Homo erectus</i>. All upper limb elements possess strikingly thick cortices, resembling the condition in australopiths and other early <i>Homo</i> fossils. The stature estimate of 160 cm based on humeral length is intermediate between those for <i>H. habilis</i> (OH 62, KNM-ER 3735) and <i>H. erectus</i> (KNM-ER 1808, KNM-WT 15000). The body mass estimate of 30.7–32.7 kg is slightly lower than other <i>H. habilis</i> specimens and noticeably lower than estimates for <i>H. erectus</i>. KNM-ER 64061 indicates that <i>H. habilis</i> retained more primitive proportions and was smaller in stature and mass than <i>H. erectus</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 3","pages":"485-545"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.70100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145961120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Morphological and anatomical analysis of skeletal anomalies in demersal fishes of Antalya Bay, Türkiye 土耳其安塔利亚湾底栖鱼类骨骼异常的形态学和解剖学分析。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1002/ar.70067
Salim Serkan Güçlü, Laith A. Jawad, Deniz İnnal

This study reveals novel skeletal deformities in two marine fish species (Nemipterus randalli and Pomadasys stridens) from Antalya Bay, Türkiye, linking them to potential impacts on locomotion and ecological fitness. Major abnormalities include pectoral fin absence, saddleback syndrome, and nasal defects. This study establishes the critical relevance of documenting fish deformities as a powerful and sensitive tool for monitoring ecosystem health. The study advocates for integrating imaging technologies into ecological monitoring to detect hidden stressors affecting marine life. By understanding how deformities influence movement and survival, scientists can better evaluate anthropogenic impacts on fish populations. These insights advance the use of morphological abnormalities as sensitive indicators of ecosystem health, supporting more proactive marine conservation strategies.

本研究揭示了来自土耳其安塔利亚湾的两种海洋鱼类(Nemipterus randalli和Pomadasys stridens)的新型骨骼畸形,并将其与运动和生态适应性的潜在影响联系起来。主要异常包括胸鳍缺失、鞍背综合征和鼻缺损。这项研究建立了记录鱼类畸形作为监测生态系统健康的强大而敏感的工具的关键相关性。该研究提倡将成像技术整合到生态监测中,以发现影响海洋生物的隐藏压力源。通过了解畸形如何影响运动和生存,科学家可以更好地评估人为对鱼类种群的影响。这些见解促进了形态异常作为生态系统健康敏感指标的使用,支持更积极主动的海洋保护策略。
{"title":"Morphological and anatomical analysis of skeletal anomalies in demersal fishes of Antalya Bay, Türkiye","authors":"Salim Serkan Güçlü,&nbsp;Laith A. Jawad,&nbsp;Deniz İnnal","doi":"10.1002/ar.70067","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70067","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study reveals novel skeletal deformities in two marine fish species (<i>Nemipterus randalli</i> and <i>Pomadasys stridens</i>) from Antalya Bay, Türkiye, linking them to potential impacts on locomotion and ecological fitness. Major abnormalities include pectoral fin absence, saddleback syndrome, and nasal defects. This study establishes the critical relevance of documenting fish deformities as a powerful and sensitive tool for monitoring ecosystem health. The study advocates for integrating imaging technologies into ecological monitoring to detect hidden stressors affecting marine life. By understanding how deformities influence movement and survival, scientists can better evaluate anthropogenic impacts on fish populations. These insights advance the use of morphological abnormalities as sensitive indicators of ecosystem health, supporting more proactive marine conservation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 3","pages":"700-719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145260515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstracts from the 2025 International Symposium on Morphological Sciences 2025年国际形态科学研讨会摘要
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.1002/ar.70037
{"title":"Abstracts from the 2025 International Symposium on Morphological Sciences","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ar.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70037","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"308 S1","pages":"S2-S142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.70037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145101395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Anatomical Record sinks its teeth into the world of sabertooths in a new special issue 《解剖记录》在一个新的特刊中将剑齿虎的牙齿沉入剑齿虎的世界。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI: 10.1002/ar.70052
Jeffrey T. Laitman, Heather F. Smith
<p>Next to paying taxes, having in-laws move next door, or, for academics, getting a call saying “the Dean wants to see you,” having to go to the dentist is up there with most hated activities. Many of us can still hear in our mind's ear the buzzing sounds of those horrid drills for days after our painful visits to those chairs of pain. No matter how many tanks with cute angel fish, pictures of Greek beaches, or attempts at soothing music, nothing makes a dentist visit, and their (seemingly gleeful) assault on our teeth, bearable. These encounters are for many of us the modern equivalent of the medieval torture of being put on the rack. With apologies to dentists, most of the world really hates teeth!</p><p>With the possible exception, that is, of paleontologists and evolutionary biologists. Many of that ilk are as inseparably glued to teeth as accountants are to tax time. For them, every nook and cranny, every related feature of bite force, the nature of masticatory biomechanics and muscle function, or the influence of tooth shape on skull shape, and how all this fits into the evolutionary cosmos, is their perpetual candy store of insatiable delicatibles. While it is hard to pinpoint when the systematic study of teeth began—our ancestors probably first gained interest when one was hit in the mouth with a rock in the Pliocene of Africa and noticed things falling out—much can be traced to the work by the great Richard Owen in <i>Odontography: or, A Treatise on the Comparative Anatomy of the Teeth</i> (<span>1840</span>–1845; see also Turp, Brace, and Alt, <span>1997</span>). Ever since, it has been an ongoing smorgasbord for any and all fascinated by those enamel-wrapped packages lodged in the mouth (for a glimpse into this world, particularly as it realtes to mammalian and human diet and evolution, see the overview by Ungar (<span>2017</span>)—a brilliant anthropologist from New York City who gave up biting into Pastrami sandwiches for the delicacies of Arkansas!)</p><p>While toothophiles find any shard of enamel from our past a possible story, there are some animals that set their collective mouths watering. Indeed, what could be more fascinating to them than examing one of the most curious, complicated, and extraordinary groups to ever show their toothy grins: sabertooths? This group can be seen as the “Holy Grail” for those who seek to explore many facets of the comparative biology of teeth, from internal structure, to masticatory forces and effects on the skull, to societal communication among and between groups, to how this morphology appeared and re-appeared evolutionarily. And this leads us to this month's special, Special Issue: “Long in the Tooth: New Insights into the Functional Morphology of Sabertooths.” The Special Issue has been Guest edited by three most interesting, and accomplished, comparative anatomists: Adam Hartstone-Rose of the Department of Biological Sciences of North Carolina State University in Raleigh, North Carolina; T
除了纳税、让姻亲搬到隔壁,或者对学生来说,接到“院长要见你”的电话,不得不去看牙医是最令人讨厌的事情。我们中的许多人在痛苦地坐在那些痛苦的椅子上几天后,仍然可以在我们的脑海中听到那些可怕的钻头发出的嗡嗡声。不管有多少装着可爱的天使鱼的鱼缸,希腊海滩的照片,或者舒缓音乐的尝试,没有什么能让牙医的拜访,以及他们(看似愉快的)对我们牙齿的攻击,变得可以忍受。对我们中的许多人来说,这些遭遇相当于中世纪被送上刑架的酷刑。向牙医道歉,世界上大多数人真的讨厌牙齿!除了可能的例外,那就是古生物学家和进化生物学家。这类人中的许多人就像会计师对纳税时间一样粘得死死的。对他们来说,每一个角落和缝隙,咬合力的每一个相关特征,咀嚼生物力学和肌肉功能的本质,或者牙齿形状对头骨形状的影响,以及所有这些如何适应进化的宇宙,都是他们永不满足的糖果店。虽然很难确定对牙齿的系统研究是从什么时候开始的——我们的祖先可能是在非洲上新世被石头砸到嘴里并注意到东西掉出来的时候才开始感兴趣的——但这可以追溯到伟大的理查德·欧文在《牙齿学》(1840-1845;参见Turp, Brace, and Alt, 1997)中所做的工作。从那以后,它一直是一个持续的自助餐,任何和所有着迷于那些珐琅包装的包裹在嘴里(一瞥这个世界,特别是因为它涉及哺乳动物和人类的饮食和进化,见概述Ungar(2017) -一个杰出的人类学家从纽约市放弃咬熏牛肉三明治阿肯色州的美味!)虽然爱牙者发现任何来自我们过去的牙釉质碎片都是一个可能的故事,但有些动物却让他们垂涎不已。事实上,有什么能比研究剑齿虎这个最奇怪、最复杂、最不寻常的种群来展示它们的咧嘴笑更让他们着迷呢?对于那些寻求探索牙齿比较生物学的许多方面的人来说,这一群体可以被视为“圣杯”,从内部结构到咀嚼力和对头骨的影响,到群体之间和群体之间的社会交流,再到这种形态如何在进化中出现和重新出现。这就引出了这个月的特刊:“长牙:剑齿虎功能形态学的新见解。”本期特刊由三位最有趣、最有成就的比较解剖学家担任客座编辑:北卡罗来纳州罗利市北卡罗莱纳州立大学生物科学系的亚当·哈特斯通-罗斯;英国布里斯托尔大学古生物研究小组的Tahlia I. Pollock;以及瑞典斯德哥尔摩瑞典自然历史博物馆古生物学系的Lars Werdelin (Hartstone-Rose et al., 2025,图1和2)。按照我们的惯例,我要对这三位充满活力的人说几句感谢的话,他们努力工作,从深度和广度上考察了这非凡的剑齿虎类群。首先,我们衷心欢迎我们杂志的新成员,塔利亚·波洛克(波洛克&安德森,2025)和拉斯·沃德林(沃德林,2025)。波洛克博士是三人组中资历较浅的一位,他毕业于风景秀丽的澳大利亚墨尔本著名的莫纳什大学(Monash University),毕业时间相对较晚。虽然每个小组偶尔都会发表关于牙齿的文章,但波洛克博士的重点是牙列和相关的生物力学。甚至在她职业生涯的早期,她就探索了不同群体的牙齿世界,包括鲸鱼和许多食肉动物,包括塔斯马尼亚魔鬼。“干得好”就像她老家的人说的,欢迎来到解剖记录。加入波洛克博士的是一位科学家,Lars Werdelin教授,对于我们这些在比较和进化解剖学领域工作的人来说,他几乎不需要介绍。沃尔德林教授可以说是近几十年来最有影响力的食肉动物古生物学家,不仅因为他自己惊人的科学成就,还因为他作为另一本受人尊敬的杂志《脊椎动物古生物学杂志》(journal of Vertebrate Paleontology)的联合主编为推进自己的领域所做的一切。事实上,为了最适合本期特刊,沃德林教授以他的名字命名了一种剑齿虎猫科动物(Dinofelis werdelini)和一种已灭绝的鬣狗属(Werdelinus)。就像他们在JL的家乡布鲁克林说的,“他不是剁肝”!我们很荣幸他能成为我们解剖记录大家庭的一员。这让我们对哈特斯通-罗斯-亚当教授表示感谢,因为我们太熟悉了,不适合正式的头衔。 亚当是解剖记录家族的核心成员,是我们最有成效的副编辑和多产的贡献者之一。他的科学涵盖了许多领域,但本质上是研究肌肉和骨骼肌界面的结构和功能的交集。亚当的目标群体主要是灵长类动物——包括一系列链鼻和颈鼻——但他的比较网扩展到哺乳动物,通常包括食肉动物和蝙蝠。如前所述,他的实验室和学生(他是一位敬业的导师,毫不奇怪有多少学生涌向他的工作台)的产出是惊人的,其工作发表在许多期刊上,包括美国生物人类学杂志,PLoS One, FASEB杂志等。他的团队经常与我们一起发表文章,包括对牙齿、咬力、咀嚼肌、膳食肌肉肌肉结构的研究(例如Perry等人,2011年,2013年;Hartstone-Rose等人,2012年;Burrows等人,2018年;Fabre等人,2018年;Hartstone-Rose等人,Santana, 2018年;Deutsch等人,2019年,2025年;Dickinson, Basham等人,2019a; Dickinson, Kolli等人,2019b; hartson - rose等人,2018年,2019年;Leonard等人,2019年;Dickinson等人,2024年;Dickinson等人,2024年;Dickinson等人,2025年;Dickinson等人,2024年;Dickinson等人,2025年;Faillace et al., 2025;Moretti et al., 2025);肌纤维或颅后肌肉的研究(如Boettcher等人,2019;Dickinson等人;Hartstone-Rose, 2025; Leischner等人,2018);甚至还有一个有趣的尝试,研究了层状目蝙蝠内耳和中耳解剖的生态形态学相关性(Dickinson et al., 2023)。除此之外,Adam还客串编辑了两篇杰出的解剖记录特刊,探讨了肌肉功能形态的行为相关性,其中一篇是关于颅肌的(Hartstone-Rose & Santana, 2018; Laitman, 2018a; Laitman & Albertine, 2018a);第二个是颅后肌肉(Laitman, 2018b; Laitman & Albertine, 2018b; Marchi & Hartstone-Rose, 2018)。毫无疑问,亚当是你会遇到的最有趣的人之一;他是个博学多才的人,是现代版的达芬奇。事实上,像莱昂纳多一样,他是一位出色的艺术家,他的作品甚至为我们的解剖记录封面带来了亮点,例如,这一期特刊以及2023年的一期“恐龙:来自旧骨头的新想法”(Hartstone-Rose et al., 2023)。像列奥纳多一样,他的大脑似乎总是在工作,思考新的项目和新的方式来传递它们。例如,他最近的一个非解剖学项目包括绘制动物在最近的日食期间的行为;他甚至为青少年读者发表了他的观察结果(Hartstone-Rose & Deutsch, 2025;谁有时间考虑这些东西,因为补助金可能要到期了?)但是,这就是亚当,正如JL在2018年《亚当的特刊》(Laitman, 2018a)的评论中所
{"title":"The Anatomical Record sinks its teeth into the world of sabertooths in a new special issue","authors":"Jeffrey T. Laitman,&nbsp;Heather F. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ar.70052","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70052","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Next to paying taxes, having in-laws move next door, or, for academics, getting a call saying “the Dean wants to see you,” having to go to the dentist is up there with most hated activities. Many of us can still hear in our mind's ear the buzzing sounds of those horrid drills for days after our painful visits to those chairs of pain. No matter how many tanks with cute angel fish, pictures of Greek beaches, or attempts at soothing music, nothing makes a dentist visit, and their (seemingly gleeful) assault on our teeth, bearable. These encounters are for many of us the modern equivalent of the medieval torture of being put on the rack. With apologies to dentists, most of the world really hates teeth!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the possible exception, that is, of paleontologists and evolutionary biologists. Many of that ilk are as inseparably glued to teeth as accountants are to tax time. For them, every nook and cranny, every related feature of bite force, the nature of masticatory biomechanics and muscle function, or the influence of tooth shape on skull shape, and how all this fits into the evolutionary cosmos, is their perpetual candy store of insatiable delicatibles. While it is hard to pinpoint when the systematic study of teeth began—our ancestors probably first gained interest when one was hit in the mouth with a rock in the Pliocene of Africa and noticed things falling out—much can be traced to the work by the great Richard Owen in &lt;i&gt;Odontography: or, A Treatise on the Comparative Anatomy of the Teeth&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;span&gt;1840&lt;/span&gt;–1845; see also Turp, Brace, and Alt, &lt;span&gt;1997&lt;/span&gt;). Ever since, it has been an ongoing smorgasbord for any and all fascinated by those enamel-wrapped packages lodged in the mouth (for a glimpse into this world, particularly as it realtes to mammalian and human diet and evolution, see the overview by Ungar (&lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;)—a brilliant anthropologist from New York City who gave up biting into Pastrami sandwiches for the delicacies of Arkansas!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While toothophiles find any shard of enamel from our past a possible story, there are some animals that set their collective mouths watering. Indeed, what could be more fascinating to them than examing one of the most curious, complicated, and extraordinary groups to ever show their toothy grins: sabertooths? This group can be seen as the “Holy Grail” for those who seek to explore many facets of the comparative biology of teeth, from internal structure, to masticatory forces and effects on the skull, to societal communication among and between groups, to how this morphology appeared and re-appeared evolutionarily. And this leads us to this month's special, Special Issue: “Long in the Tooth: New Insights into the Functional Morphology of Sabertooths.” The Special Issue has been Guest edited by three most interesting, and accomplished, comparative anatomists: Adam Hartstone-Rose of the Department of Biological Sciences of North Carolina State University in Raleigh, North Carolina; T","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"308 11","pages":"2821-2824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.70052","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Looking into Chinese fossils: Paleobiology, evolution, and biodiversity 中国化石研究:古生物学、进化与生物多样性。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1002/ar.70035
He Chen, Tong Bao, Hong Pang
{"title":"Looking into Chinese fossils: Paleobiology, evolution, and biodiversity","authors":"He Chen,&nbsp;Tong Bao,&nbsp;Hong Pang","doi":"10.1002/ar.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"308 10","pages":"2529-2533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144985892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Paleobiology, evolution, and biodiversity of Chinese fossils in The Anatomical Record 《解剖记录》中中国化石的古生物学、进化和生物多样性。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-08 DOI: 10.1002/ar.70034
Heather F. Smith, Jeffrey T. Laitman
<p>For the past century, China has provided a wealth of exciting fossil discoveries (e.g., Dodson, <span>2025</span>). Starting with the initial discovery of dinosaurs and hominins in China in the 1920s, a plethora of findings quickly followed of early mammaliaforms, birds, sabretooth cats, Ice Age megafauna, and much more. In fact, China now has more described dinosaur genera than any other country.</p><p>In this Special Issue of <i>The Anatomical Record</i>, we celebrate the paleobiology, evolution, and biodiversity of the Chinese fossil record. The volume brings together a collection of papers on diverse taxa ranging from flying pterosaurs (Chen et al., <span>2025</span>; Wu et al., <span>2025</span>) to oversized primates (Pan et al., <span>2025</span>) to giant swamp otters (Adrian et al., <span>2025</span>) to tiny insects (Zhang et al., <span>2025</span>) to sabretooth cats (Jiangzuo et al., <span>2025</span>) to long-necked archosauromorphs (Wang et al., <span>2025</span>). The issue has been Guest Edited by three experts in the field of paleontology, Drs. He Chen, Tong Bao, and Hong Pang (Figure 1).</p><p>Dr. He Chen is an Associate Researcher at Sun Yat-sen University's School of Ecology, specializing in Mesozoic and Cenozoic Paleoecology, with a particular interest in the evolution of Pterosaurs. Her team investigates the relationship between the environment and vertebrates through the study of coprolites and dental calculus (Chen et al., <span>2018</span>; Rummy et al., <span>2021</span>). She is one of the key members of a long-term international collaborative research team between China and Brazil focusing on pterosaurs (Chen et al., <span>2020</span>) and has discovered numerous new species of pterosaurs (Wang, Kellner, et al., <span>2023</span>; Wang, Zhang, et al., <span>2023</span>), including the renowned and rare <i>Hamipterus</i> (Wang et al., <span>2017</span>). In their ongoing research on <i>Hamipterus</i>, Dr. Chen's team conducted a preliminary analysis of its dental microstructure (Chen et al., <span>2025</span>) and emphasized the similarities and differences between the flight apparatus of pterosaurs and birds by studying the pectoral girdle of <i>Hamipterus</i> (Wu et al., <span>2025</span>). To clarify the poorly understood palatal region of pterosaurs, they employed advanced x-ray imaging techniques on various clades of pterosaur specimens (<i>Dsungaripterus</i>, <i>Kunpengopterus</i>, <i>Hongshanopterus</i>, and <i>Hamipterus</i>). They showed that advanced x-ray imaging techniques provide insights into pterosaur cranial anatomy and offer a fresh perspective for exploring the evolutionary history of these flying reptiles (Chen et al., <span>2024</span>).</p><p>Dr. Tong Bao is an Associate Professor at Sun Yat-sen University's School of Ecology, and he pioneers research on Mesozoic insect-plant coevolution using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and confocal laser microscopy. His team's landmark discovery of 100
来自中国四川盆地和云南省的河川马门奇龙(Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis)被纳入了一项研究,该研究发现,由关节关节和饲养适应性支持的垂直伸展可能是蜥脚类动物极长脖子的功能(Paul, 2017)。一些关于早期鸟类化石的研究,包括中国的标本,已经发表在《AR》上。一项对中国早白垩世华集营组的冯宁原鸟的研究描述了两个保存完好的新标本,揭示了详细的骨骼和羽毛形态,并提供了对鸟目鸟类间歇性飞行的最早证据(Chiappe等,2020)。另一项关于早期鸟类的研究表明,现代鸟类喙的进化涉及逐渐的形态变化,使得现代鸟类特有的颅骨运动得以发展(Wang & Hu, 2017)。来自北京附近周口店遗址的直立人标本已被纳入许多比较人族研究,有助于阐明早期人族颅骨形态的演变(例如,Bräuer et al., 2004; Bruner & Manzi, 2005; Durband, 2008; Laitman & Tattersall, 2001; Lordkipanidze, 2006)。另一项利用下颌骨形状和颅骨生物力学的研究表明,来自中国侏罗纪的哺乳动物Hadrocodium wui不完全是穴居动物,而可能是半穴居或半水生动物,以软体无脊椎动物为食(Tumelty & Lautenschlager, 2025)。在一项关于哺乳动物听力进化的研究中,来自上黄的一根基底类人岩骨被纳入研究,该研究发现高频听力很可能在原始祖类早期就进化出来了,而低频灵敏度很可能在单孔类等特定谱系中较晚才发展起来(Coleman & Boyer, 2012)。总之,丰富的中国化石记录提供了大量新的古生物学和古生态学资料。这些发现加深了我们对脊椎动物和无脊椎动物化石类群进化的认识,揭示了重大灭绝事件,增加了我们对古生态系统发展的认识。我们希望你喜欢这期特刊中关于中国古生物学的精彩论文集。Heather F. Smith:写作-评论和编辑;写作——原稿;调查;概念化;可视化;项目管理。杰弗里·莱特曼:写作-原稿;写作——审阅和编辑;概念化;项目管理。
{"title":"Paleobiology, evolution, and biodiversity of Chinese fossils in The Anatomical Record","authors":"Heather F. Smith,&nbsp;Jeffrey T. Laitman","doi":"10.1002/ar.70034","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70034","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;For the past century, China has provided a wealth of exciting fossil discoveries (e.g., Dodson, &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;). Starting with the initial discovery of dinosaurs and hominins in China in the 1920s, a plethora of findings quickly followed of early mammaliaforms, birds, sabretooth cats, Ice Age megafauna, and much more. In fact, China now has more described dinosaur genera than any other country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this Special Issue of &lt;i&gt;The Anatomical Record&lt;/i&gt;, we celebrate the paleobiology, evolution, and biodiversity of the Chinese fossil record. The volume brings together a collection of papers on diverse taxa ranging from flying pterosaurs (Chen et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;; Wu et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) to oversized primates (Pan et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) to giant swamp otters (Adrian et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) to tiny insects (Zhang et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) to sabretooth cats (Jiangzuo et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) to long-necked archosauromorphs (Wang et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;). The issue has been Guest Edited by three experts in the field of paleontology, Drs. He Chen, Tong Bao, and Hong Pang (Figure 1).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dr. He Chen is an Associate Researcher at Sun Yat-sen University's School of Ecology, specializing in Mesozoic and Cenozoic Paleoecology, with a particular interest in the evolution of Pterosaurs. Her team investigates the relationship between the environment and vertebrates through the study of coprolites and dental calculus (Chen et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;; Rummy et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;). She is one of the key members of a long-term international collaborative research team between China and Brazil focusing on pterosaurs (Chen et al., &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;) and has discovered numerous new species of pterosaurs (Wang, Kellner, et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;; Wang, Zhang, et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;), including the renowned and rare &lt;i&gt;Hamipterus&lt;/i&gt; (Wang et al., &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;). In their ongoing research on &lt;i&gt;Hamipterus&lt;/i&gt;, Dr. Chen's team conducted a preliminary analysis of its dental microstructure (Chen et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) and emphasized the similarities and differences between the flight apparatus of pterosaurs and birds by studying the pectoral girdle of &lt;i&gt;Hamipterus&lt;/i&gt; (Wu et al., &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;). To clarify the poorly understood palatal region of pterosaurs, they employed advanced x-ray imaging techniques on various clades of pterosaur specimens (&lt;i&gt;Dsungaripterus&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Kunpengopterus&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Hongshanopterus&lt;/i&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;Hamipterus&lt;/i&gt;). They showed that advanced x-ray imaging techniques provide insights into pterosaur cranial anatomy and offer a fresh perspective for exploring the evolutionary history of these flying reptiles (Chen et al., &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dr. Tong Bao is an Associate Professor at Sun Yat-sen University's School of Ecology, and he pioneers research on Mesozoic insect-plant coevolution using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and confocal laser microscopy. His team's landmark discovery of 100","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"308 10","pages":"2525-2528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.70034","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144802395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The lower jaw of Devonian ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii): Anatomy, relationships, and functional morphology 泥盆纪鳍鱼(放光鳍鱼科)的下颚:解剖、关系和功能形态。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI: 10.1002/ar.70005
Ben Igielman, Rodrigo Tinoco Figueroa, Robert R. Higgins, Stephanie E. Pierce, Michael I. Coates, Emily M. Troyer, Vincent Fernandez, Kathleen Dollman, Jing Lu, Min Zhu, Matt Friedman, Sam Giles

Actinopterygii is a major extant vertebrate group, but limited data are available for its earliest members. Here we investigate the morphology of Devonian actinopterygians, focusing on the lower jaw. We use X-ray computed tomography (XCT) to provide comprehensive descriptions of the mandibles of 19 species, which span the whole of the Devonian and represent roughly two-thirds of all taxa known from more than isolated or fragmentary material. Our findings corroborate previous reports in part but reveal considerable new anatomical data and represent the first detailed description for roughly half of these taxa. The mandibles display substantial variation in size, spanning more than an order of magnitude. Although most conform to a generalized pattern of a large dentary and one or two smaller infradentaries, XCT data reveal significant differences in the structure of the jaw and arrangement of teeth that may be of functional relevance. We report the presence of a rudimentary coronoid process in several taxa, contributed to by the dentary and/or infradentaries, as well a raised articular region, resulting in a mandible with an offset bite and that functions as a bent level arm. Among the most striking variation is that of tooth morphology: several taxa have heterodont dentary teeth that vary in size and orientation, and multiple variations on enlarged, whorl-like and posteriorly-oriented anterior coronoid dentition are observed. We use these new data to revise morphological characters that may be of phylogenetic significance and consider the possible functional implicationds of these traits. The observed variation in mandible form and structure suggests previously unappreciated functional diversity among otherwise morphologically homogenous Devonian ray-finned fishes.

放线翼属是现存的主要脊椎动物类群,但其最早成员的资料有限。在这里,我们研究泥盆纪放光翼龙的形态,重点是下颌。我们使用x射线计算机断层扫描(XCT)对19个物种的下颌骨进行了全面的描述,这些物种跨越了整个泥盆纪,代表了从更多孤立或碎片材料中已知的所有分类群的大约三分之二。我们的发现在一定程度上证实了以前的报告,但揭示了相当多的新的解剖学数据,并首次详细描述了大约一半的这些分类群。下颌骨的大小差异很大,跨度超过一个数量级。虽然大多数符合一个大的牙齿和一个或两个小的下牙的一般模式,但XCT数据显示了颌骨结构和牙齿排列的显着差异,这可能与功能相关。我们报告了在几个分类群中存在一个初级冠突,由近牙和/或下牙,以及一个凸起的关节区域,导致下颌骨与偏咬合和作为弯曲水平臂的功能。其中最显著的变化是牙齿形态的变化:一些类群具有大小和取向不同的异齿无齿牙齿,并且观察到扩大的、轮状的和后向的前冠状牙的多种变化。我们利用这些新数据来修正可能具有系统发育意义的形态特征,并考虑这些特征可能的功能含义。观察到的下颌骨形态和结构的变化表明,在形态均匀的泥盆纪鳍鱼中,以前未被认识到的功能多样性。
{"title":"The lower jaw of Devonian ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii): Anatomy, relationships, and functional morphology","authors":"Ben Igielman,&nbsp;Rodrigo Tinoco Figueroa,&nbsp;Robert R. Higgins,&nbsp;Stephanie E. Pierce,&nbsp;Michael I. Coates,&nbsp;Emily M. Troyer,&nbsp;Vincent Fernandez,&nbsp;Kathleen Dollman,&nbsp;Jing Lu,&nbsp;Min Zhu,&nbsp;Matt Friedman,&nbsp;Sam Giles","doi":"10.1002/ar.70005","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Actinopterygii is a major extant vertebrate group, but limited data are available for its earliest members. Here we investigate the morphology of Devonian actinopterygians, focusing on the lower jaw. We use X-ray computed tomography (XCT) to provide comprehensive descriptions of the mandibles of 19 species, which span the whole of the Devonian and represent roughly two-thirds of all taxa known from more than isolated or fragmentary material. Our findings corroborate previous reports in part but reveal considerable new anatomical data and represent the first detailed description for roughly half of these taxa. The mandibles display substantial variation in size, spanning more than an order of magnitude. Although most conform to a generalized pattern of a large dentary and one or two smaller infradentaries, XCT data reveal significant differences in the structure of the jaw and arrangement of teeth that may be of functional relevance. We report the presence of a rudimentary coronoid process in several taxa, contributed to by the dentary and/or infradentaries, as well a raised articular region, resulting in a mandible with an offset bite and that functions as a bent level arm. Among the most striking variation is that of tooth morphology: several taxa have heterodont dentary teeth that vary in size and orientation, and multiple variations on enlarged, whorl-like and posteriorly-oriented anterior coronoid dentition are observed. We use these new data to revise morphological characters that may be of phylogenetic significance and consider the possible functional implicationds of these traits. The observed variation in mandible form and structure suggests previously unappreciated functional diversity among otherwise morphologically homogenous Devonian ray-finned fishes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 3","pages":"550-602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.70005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144683999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Terminology on human molariform teeth and the Commentary by Soares and colleagues 人类臼齿术语及Soares等人注释。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.1002/ar.70020
Timothy D. Smith, Kristen A. Prufrock, Valerie B. DeLeon
{"title":"Terminology on human molariform teeth and the Commentary by Soares and colleagues","authors":"Timothy D. Smith,&nbsp;Kristen A. Prufrock,&nbsp;Valerie B. DeLeon","doi":"10.1002/ar.70020","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 2","pages":"475-476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144661636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seeing structure, losing sight: The case for morphological thinking in the age of integration 看到结构,失去视觉:融合时代形态思维的案例。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-20 DOI: 10.1002/ar.70011
Paola Falletta, Erica Tagliatti, Katia Cortese
<p>In the age of genomics, artificial intelligence (AI), and systems biology, morphology risks becoming an invisible discipline, present in the background, but often unacknowledged in its interpretative power. Biology, however, remains spatial, structured, and shaped. From subcellular compartments to complex organ systems, form continues to inform function. The ability to recognize, describe, and interpret structures across biological scales is a foundational scientific competence. Morphology is not merely descriptive; it is integrative. Morphological sciences bridge developmental, cellular, and evolutionary biology, revealing how gene activity, signaling dynamics, and mechanical forces influence biological architecture. Morphological thinking enables scientists to contextualize molecular processes within the spatial complexity of cells, tissues, and organs. Paradoxically, while technological tools for visualizing structures are expanding rapidly, the number of scientists trained in morphological reasoning is shrinking. If left unaddressed, this erosion threatens to undermine both the scientific depth and translational relevance of biological research. This commentary argues that rediscovering morphology is not a nostalgic act, but a necessary one. We must affirm morphological thinking as a core scientific competence, reframe educational practices to sustain spatial reasoning, and integrate morphology into the evolving world of AI-driven imaging and systems biology.</p><p>Morphology has long been the foundation upon which biological sciences were built. In the 19th century, Georges Cuvier's comparative anatomy laid the groundwork for evolutionary thought by revealing structural homologies. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's <i>Metamorphosis of Plants</i> introduced the idea of structural transformation as a fundamental biological process. Rudolf Virchow's cellular pathology framed disease as a disruption of cellular structure (Byers, <span>1989</span>). Santiago Ramón y Cajal's neuronal theories, based on meticulous morphological analysis, established the neuron as the basic unit of the nervous system. Morphology was not ancillary to biology's birth; it was its core. Losing morphological reasoning today is not simply a shift in focus; it represents a forgetting of biology's roots. Structural literacy remains essential for understanding the dynamic interplay between form, function, and evolution. Morphological thinking is not limited to cataloging shapes; it is a cognitive skill rooted in spatial reasoning, pattern recognition, and analogical thinking. These cognitive capacities are critical for scientific inquiry across disciplines. Research on spatial cognition, such as the meta-analysis by Uttal et al. (<span>2013</span>) and the study by Yang et al. (<span>2023</span>), shows that spatial skills are malleable and trainable, and that they predict success in STEM fields. When students engage in dissection, microscopy, or ultrastructural analysis, they
在基因组学、人工智能(AI)和系统生物学的时代,形态学有可能成为一门无形的学科,存在于背景中,但其解释能力往往未得到承认。然而,生物学仍然是空间的、结构的和形状的。从亚细胞区室到复杂的器官系统,形式继续告知功能。识别、描述和解释跨生物尺度结构的能力是一项基本的科学能力。形态学不仅仅是描述性的;它是综合的。形态学科学连接了发育生物学、细胞生物学和进化生物学,揭示了基因活性、信号动力学和机械力如何影响生物结构。形态思维使科学家能够将分子过程置于细胞、组织和器官的空间复杂性中。矛盾的是,虽然可视化结构的技术工具正在迅速扩大,但受过形态推理训练的科学家数量却在减少。如果不加以解决,这种侵蚀可能会破坏生物学研究的科学深度和转化相关性。这篇评论认为,重新发现形态学不是一种怀旧行为,而是一种必要的行为。我们必须确认形态学思维是一种核心科学能力,重构教育实践以维持空间推理,并将形态学融入人工智能驱动的成像和系统生物学的不断发展的世界。形态学长期以来一直是生物科学建立的基础。19世纪,乔治·居维叶的比较解剖学通过揭示结构同源性为进化思想奠定了基础。约翰·沃尔夫冈·冯·歌德的《植物变形记》介绍了结构转化作为基本生物过程的概念。Rudolf Virchow的细胞病理学将疾病定义为细胞结构的破坏(Byers, 1989)。Santiago Ramón y Cajal的神经元理论,基于细致的形态学分析,确立了神经元是神经系统的基本单位。形态学并不是生物学诞生的附属品;这是它的核心。今天失去形态推理不仅仅是焦点的转移;它代表了对生物学根源的遗忘。结构素养对于理解形式、功能和进化之间的动态相互作用至关重要。形态思维并不局限于对形状进行分类;它是一种基于空间推理、模式识别和类比思维的认知技能。这些认知能力对于跨学科的科学探究至关重要。空间认知方面的研究,如Uttal等人(2013)的荟萃分析和Yang等人(2023)的研究表明,空间技能是可塑和可训练的,它们预示着STEM领域的成功。当学生从事解剖、显微镜或超微结构分析时,他们不仅仅是在记忆表格;他们正在训练自己处理、重建和解释复杂三维关系的能力。形态学训练开发了一个超越生物学的“心理工具包”,增强了对系统进行推理、诊断异常和从结构模式推断功能含义的能力。这种形态和功能之间的联系在19世纪就已经很明显了,当时显微镜使科学家能够以前所未有的细节探索微观解剖学。那个时期的一个显著的创新是使用透明照相机和蜡板在三维上重建显微解剖(Born, 1876, 1883)。这些重建提供的空间洞察力在今天仍然相关,正如最近的工作(Maier等人,2023)和新的解剖记录特刊中关于颅骨研究的相关讨论(Laitman & Smith, 2025)所示。从更广阔的历史角度来看,Nyhart的《生物学的形成》深入分析了19世纪德国大学的形态学是如何塑造生物学思维的(Nyhart, 1995)。在宏观层面上,解剖基础教育的衰落标志着解剖科学的明显转变。Cornwall和Stringer(2021)强调了逐渐从课程中移除基于尸体的解剖如何削弱了学生将解剖学知识与临床和功能相关性联系起来的能力。虚拟建模、3D可视化和仿真技术提供了前所未有的教育机会,但它们也有可能使生物形态的空间体验扁平化(Estai & Bunt, 2016)。触觉参与,即探索纹理、密度和结构之间关系的物理行为,培养了虚拟工具无法完全复制的具体化空间认知。对结构性读写能力下降的担忧并不新鲜。德雷克等人。 (2009)已经警告说,减少结构素养可能会损害科学深度和临床推理,强调实践经验对解剖学教育中综合思维的发展至关重要。同样,Sugand等人(2010)已经强调,动手解剖独特地整合了视觉、触觉和认知模式,使学生能够全面理解解剖学。形态学思维在外科实践中也很重要,在外科实践中,识别、解释和适应解剖变异的能力是至关重要的(Carmody等人(2024))。外科手术不仅是解剖学知识的应用,而且是对三维生物结构的积极、动态的解释(Older, 2004; Nzenwa et al., 2023)。没有形态推理,空间定向障碍和结构关系的误解增加了术中并发症的风险。最近,一封致编辑的信强调了数字学习虽然有价值,但在医学教育中显示出的局限性,尤其是在解剖学等实用学科中。作者强调面对面学习在获得触觉和空间技能方面的优势,并呼吁整合混合策略,平衡数字和传统方法,以优化健康科学教育(Millán-Hernández, 2025)。因此,虽然数字平台可以实现知识获取的民主化,但它们必须作为实际参与的补充,而不是替代。解剖学会的核心区域解剖学教学大纲(Smith et al., 2016)继续呼吁关注直接结构意识的必要性,认识到空间推理技能仍然是有效临床实践的基础。这种分离延伸到微观领域。数字组织学平台的兴起增加了可访问性和标准化,但也引入了一个抽象层。通过显微镜进行的传统组织学检查培养了对生物组织的真实纹理、不规则性和上下文细微差别的敏感性,而这些品质在观看理想的数字幻灯片时往往会丢失。直接观察组织有助于将细胞形式与功能联系起来的认知过程,使学习者能够欣赏生物变异性和病理学。没有物理显微镜的经验,学生和研究人员可能会脱离现实世界生物物质的复杂性,削弱他们识别有意义的结构变化的能力。在超微结构水平上,电子显微镜(EM),历史上形态学发现的基石,正在经历深刻的变革。现代电子显微镜平台,如连续块面扫描电镜、聚焦离子束扫描电镜和低温电子显微镜断层扫描,能够以前所未有的分辨率可视化生物结构(McCafferty et al., 2024)。相关光学和电子显微镜(CLEM)方法进一步弥合了功能成像和结构分析之间的差距(Mäntylä & Verkade, 2024)。然而,这些技术的复杂性和成本已经推动了大规模成像设施的集中。虽然设施提供了技术途径,但它们往往将科学家与他们的标本分开。在许多情况下,研究人员与超微结构数据的直接接触被委托给成像专家所取代。这种进化冒着将形态学降低为一种技术服务的风险,而不是将其保留为一种科学的推理模式。形态学家必须保持对EM数据的积极解释,识别结构模式、结构破坏和上下文相关的变化,这些变化不能单独通过分子特征来捕获。形态学不仅没有过时,而且对系统生物学越来越重要。系统生物学旨在模拟基因、蛋白质、细胞和组织之间复杂的相互作用,然而这些相互作用本质上是空间和结构的。多尺度组织模型,如心脏传导系统或肿瘤微环境,需要精确的结构图来模拟生理动力学(Burgos-Panadero等人,2019;Jorba等人,2021)。形态学数据作为验证这些模型的基础事实。同样,空间转录组学和空间蛋白质组学等新兴领域也依赖于在解剖学背景下整合分子信息(Chu et al., 2024)。如果没有结构框架,空间组学就有可能失去其解释力。形态推理对于跨尺度解释复杂的生物系统仍然是不可或缺的。如今,人工智能和机器学习在成像科学领域的兴起使形态学面临的挑战更加复杂。人工智能算法在检测模式和分割结构方面有了很大的改进,这些数据集的规模和复杂性都是前所未有的。 例如,在神经影像学中,人工智能正在改变与疾病进展相关的细微形态学变化的检测(CLAIM,
{"title":"Seeing structure, losing sight: The case for morphological thinking in the age of integration","authors":"Paola Falletta,&nbsp;Erica Tagliatti,&nbsp;Katia Cortese","doi":"10.1002/ar.70011","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70011","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;In the age of genomics, artificial intelligence (AI), and systems biology, morphology risks becoming an invisible discipline, present in the background, but often unacknowledged in its interpretative power. Biology, however, remains spatial, structured, and shaped. From subcellular compartments to complex organ systems, form continues to inform function. The ability to recognize, describe, and interpret structures across biological scales is a foundational scientific competence. Morphology is not merely descriptive; it is integrative. Morphological sciences bridge developmental, cellular, and evolutionary biology, revealing how gene activity, signaling dynamics, and mechanical forces influence biological architecture. Morphological thinking enables scientists to contextualize molecular processes within the spatial complexity of cells, tissues, and organs. Paradoxically, while technological tools for visualizing structures are expanding rapidly, the number of scientists trained in morphological reasoning is shrinking. If left unaddressed, this erosion threatens to undermine both the scientific depth and translational relevance of biological research. This commentary argues that rediscovering morphology is not a nostalgic act, but a necessary one. We must affirm morphological thinking as a core scientific competence, reframe educational practices to sustain spatial reasoning, and integrate morphology into the evolving world of AI-driven imaging and systems biology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Morphology has long been the foundation upon which biological sciences were built. In the 19th century, Georges Cuvier's comparative anatomy laid the groundwork for evolutionary thought by revealing structural homologies. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's &lt;i&gt;Metamorphosis of Plants&lt;/i&gt; introduced the idea of structural transformation as a fundamental biological process. Rudolf Virchow's cellular pathology framed disease as a disruption of cellular structure (Byers, &lt;span&gt;1989&lt;/span&gt;). Santiago Ramón y Cajal's neuronal theories, based on meticulous morphological analysis, established the neuron as the basic unit of the nervous system. Morphology was not ancillary to biology's birth; it was its core. Losing morphological reasoning today is not simply a shift in focus; it represents a forgetting of biology's roots. Structural literacy remains essential for understanding the dynamic interplay between form, function, and evolution. Morphological thinking is not limited to cataloging shapes; it is a cognitive skill rooted in spatial reasoning, pattern recognition, and analogical thinking. These cognitive capacities are critical for scientific inquiry across disciplines. Research on spatial cognition, such as the meta-analysis by Uttal et al. (&lt;span&gt;2013&lt;/span&gt;) and the study by Yang et al. (&lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;), shows that spatial skills are malleable and trainable, and that they predict success in STEM fields. When students engage in dissection, microscopy, or ultrastructural analysis, they","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 2","pages":"471-474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803679/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144334786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1