Evaluating health literacy from an organizational perspective: A cross-sectional study of community health centers.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Public Health Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1111/phn.13357
Mei-Chuan Chang, Ying-Wei Wang, Jui-Hung Yu, Mi-Hsiu Wei, Jyh-Gang Hsieh
{"title":"Evaluating health literacy from an organizational perspective: A cross-sectional study of community health centers.","authors":"Mei-Chuan Chang, Ying-Wei Wang, Jui-Hung Yu, Mi-Hsiu Wei, Jyh-Gang Hsieh","doi":"10.1111/phn.13357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate community health centers' (CHCs) health literacy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>A total of 374 CHCs were surveyed and 258 CHCs responded, with an effective questionnaire response rate of 69.0%.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Data were collected by using a self-developed health literacy assessment tool to survey CHCs' health literacy throughout Taiwan from January to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The item of organizational health literacy (OHL) with the highest proportion of CHCs not implementing them was \"Design of easy-to-use computer applications and new media\" (47.3% not yet achieved), followed by \"Involving target audiences in document and service development\" (34.9% not yet achieved). CHCs located in northern Taiwan had higher health literacy achievement scores than those in other regions, and those in urban areas had higher health literacy achievement scores than those in general and remote areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified items with poor implementation of OHL and found regional differences in health literacy among CHCs. The findings can inform the development of targeted interventions to improve health literacy in underperforming CHCs and guide policymakers in allocating resources to regions and areas in need of.</p>","PeriodicalId":54533,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"1114-1123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate community health centers' (CHCs) health literacy.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Sample: A total of 374 CHCs were surveyed and 258 CHCs responded, with an effective questionnaire response rate of 69.0%.

Measurements: Data were collected by using a self-developed health literacy assessment tool to survey CHCs' health literacy throughout Taiwan from January to December 2019.

Results: The item of organizational health literacy (OHL) with the highest proportion of CHCs not implementing them was "Design of easy-to-use computer applications and new media" (47.3% not yet achieved), followed by "Involving target audiences in document and service development" (34.9% not yet achieved). CHCs located in northern Taiwan had higher health literacy achievement scores than those in other regions, and those in urban areas had higher health literacy achievement scores than those in general and remote areas.

Conclusions: This study identified items with poor implementation of OHL and found regional differences in health literacy among CHCs. The findings can inform the development of targeted interventions to improve health literacy in underperforming CHCs and guide policymakers in allocating resources to regions and areas in need of.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从组织角度评估健康素养:社区卫生中心横断面研究。
目的:调查社区卫生中心(CHC)的健康素养:调查社区卫生中心(CHC)的健康素养:设计:横断面研究:共调查了 374 家社区卫生中心,258 家社区卫生中心作了回复,有效问卷回复率为 69.0%:采用自主研发的健康素养评估工具,于2019年1月至12月对全台社区卫生服务中心的健康素养进行调查,收集数据:结果:未实施组织健康素养(OHL)项目比例最高的是 "设计易于使用的计算机应用程序和新媒体"(47.3%尚未实现),其次是 "让目标受众参与文件和服务开发"(34.9%尚未实现)。位于台湾北部的社区卫生服务中心的健康素养达标得分高于其他地区的社区卫生服务中心,位于城市地区的社区卫生服务中心的健康素养达标得分高于一般地区和偏远地区的社区卫生服务中心:结论:本研究确定了开放式健康教育实施不力的项目,并发现了社区健康中心在健康素养方面的地区差异。研究结果可为制定有针对性的干预措施提供信息,以提高表现不佳的社区健康中心的健康素养,并指导政策制定者向有需要的地区和区域分配资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nursing
Public Health Nursing 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Nursing publishes empirical research reports, program evaluations, and case reports focused on populations at risk across the lifespan. The journal also prints articles related to developments in practice, education of public health nurses, theory development, methodological innovations, legal, ethical, and public policy issues in public health, and the history of public health nursing throughout the world. While the primary readership of the Journal is North American, the journal is expanding its mission to address global public health concerns of interest to nurses.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Community-Based Nursing Decision Support: Machine Learning Models for Diabetes Risk Prediction Using Home Health Nursing Notes. Evaluation of Quality of Life in Elderly Individuals With Chronic Diseases Within Health Empowerment Theory. Evaluation of the Healthy and Productive Aging Program in a Primary Care Facility Among Older Population in Pinamalayan, Oriental Mindoro. "You Die or You Get Better": A Community-Engaged Narrative Inquiry Photovoice Study Examining Conceptualizations of Health-Seeking Behavior and Healthcare Encounters Among Older Adult (Im)Migrants in Wisconsin, the United States. Follow-up After Posbindu NCD Screening in Indonesia: Sociodemographic Predictors of Primary Care Engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1