Using FRAME to adapt an evidence-based dyadic intervention program for people living with dementia in residential aged care: A pilot feasibility study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Australian Occupational Therapy Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1111/1440-1630.12978
Miia Rahja, Ann Pietsch, Helen Radoslovic, Natalie Gallligani, Nicholas Burton, Maria Crotty, Kate Laver
{"title":"Using FRAME to adapt an evidence-based dyadic intervention program for people living with dementia in residential aged care: A pilot feasibility study.","authors":"Miia Rahja, Ann Pietsch, Helen Radoslovic, Natalie Gallligani, Nicholas Burton, Maria Crotty, Kate Laver","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.12978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of adapting and translating an evidence-based occupational therapist-delivered program shown to be effective in the community to residential aged care (RAC). The program aims to improve quality of care and quality of life for people living with dementia and the wellbeing of the family care partner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study took place in a not-for-profit RAC home in Adelaide, South Australia. Mixed methods, specifically questionnaires, activity logs, focus group, and one-on-one interviews were used to evaluate the feasibility of the program implementation. Staff working in the participating home, occupational therapists trained to deliver the program, and residents and their family carer partners were included. Quantitative data were analysed using proportions, means, and standard deviations. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Consumer and community involvement: </strong>This study was conducted together with a consumer (person living with dementia) and a carer representative (family member of someone residing in RAC). These representatives provided input towards the study design, interpretation of study data, discussion of results, and recommendations for future consideration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Small changes to the program improved feasibility and acceptability for delivery in RAC. While the care home staff required added support during implementation, the intervention therapists felt that the program could be delivered in this setting. Family care partners of residents with dementia felt that the program may be better suited if provided upon entry to RAC or in early stages of dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adapting a community-based dementia care program to RAC can be safe and feasible. Program adaptations are necessary for feasibility. Further adaptations and evaluations of associated outcomes (related to residents with dementia and their family care partners) are needed to assess the program effectiveness in larger scale.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Spending quality time with family members in residential aged care is important. However, many struggle to know what to say or do when visiting a family member who lives with dementia. Programs that teach families about how to communicate with people living with dementia, how to support them to take part in important everyday living activities, or how to understand why changes in behaviours may occur have not been available in residential aged care. This paper describes how we adapted one such evidence-based program from community to residential aged care settings. We consulted with people living with dementia, carers, and families and found that the program could also be valuable in this care setting. Residential aged care staff described how the program is very different to what is usually available in residential aged care, but they were optimistic that with the right support, it could be a valuable way to support residents with dementia and their families. Family members of residents with dementia and therapists delivering the program felt that residents in early stages of living in residential aged care and/or early stages of dementia could benefit the most from these programs. We found that including family members in the intervention process can be useful and empowering for families and residents. Future work should also focus on involving other staff members caring for residents in the process. Communication between staff and families is the key for program delivery and success and treating each person as an individual.</p>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of adapting and translating an evidence-based occupational therapist-delivered program shown to be effective in the community to residential aged care (RAC). The program aims to improve quality of care and quality of life for people living with dementia and the wellbeing of the family care partner.

Methods: This study took place in a not-for-profit RAC home in Adelaide, South Australia. Mixed methods, specifically questionnaires, activity logs, focus group, and one-on-one interviews were used to evaluate the feasibility of the program implementation. Staff working in the participating home, occupational therapists trained to deliver the program, and residents and their family carer partners were included. Quantitative data were analysed using proportions, means, and standard deviations. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic approach.

Consumer and community involvement: This study was conducted together with a consumer (person living with dementia) and a carer representative (family member of someone residing in RAC). These representatives provided input towards the study design, interpretation of study data, discussion of results, and recommendations for future consideration.

Results: Small changes to the program improved feasibility and acceptability for delivery in RAC. While the care home staff required added support during implementation, the intervention therapists felt that the program could be delivered in this setting. Family care partners of residents with dementia felt that the program may be better suited if provided upon entry to RAC or in early stages of dementia.

Conclusion: Adapting a community-based dementia care program to RAC can be safe and feasible. Program adaptations are necessary for feasibility. Further adaptations and evaluations of associated outcomes (related to residents with dementia and their family care partners) are needed to assess the program effectiveness in larger scale.

Plain language summary: Spending quality time with family members in residential aged care is important. However, many struggle to know what to say or do when visiting a family member who lives with dementia. Programs that teach families about how to communicate with people living with dementia, how to support them to take part in important everyday living activities, or how to understand why changes in behaviours may occur have not been available in residential aged care. This paper describes how we adapted one such evidence-based program from community to residential aged care settings. We consulted with people living with dementia, carers, and families and found that the program could also be valuable in this care setting. Residential aged care staff described how the program is very different to what is usually available in residential aged care, but they were optimistic that with the right support, it could be a valuable way to support residents with dementia and their families. Family members of residents with dementia and therapists delivering the program felt that residents in early stages of living in residential aged care and/or early stages of dementia could benefit the most from these programs. We found that including family members in the intervention process can be useful and empowering for families and residents. Future work should also focus on involving other staff members caring for residents in the process. Communication between staff and families is the key for program delivery and success and treating each person as an individual.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 FRAME 为养老院中的痴呆症患者调整以证据为基础的伴侣关系干预计划:试点可行性研究。
导言:本研究的目的是探讨将一项在社区有效的循证职业治疗师项目应用于养老院(RAC)的可行性。该项目旨在改善痴呆症患者的护理质量和生活质量,以及家庭护理伙伴的福祉:本研究在南澳大利亚阿德莱德的一家非营利性 RAC 养老院进行。研究采用了混合方法,特别是问卷调查、活动日志、焦点小组和一对一访谈,以评估计划实施的可行性。评估对象包括参与计划的疗养院工作人员、接受过计划实施培训的职业治疗师、院友及其家庭护理伙伴。定量数据采用比例、平均值和标准差进行分析。定性数据采用主题方法进行分析:这项研究是与一名消费者(痴呆症患者)和一名照护者代表(居住在康复中心的患者家属)共同进行的。这些代表为研究设计、研究数据的解释、结果讨论以及未来考虑的建议提供了意见:结果:对计划进行的微小改动提高了在康复咨询中心实施的可行性和可接受性。虽然护理院的工作人员在实施过程中需要更多的支持,但干预治疗师认为该计划可以在这种环境下实施。痴呆症住户的家庭护理伙伴认为,如果在住户进入康复中心时或痴呆症早期阶段提供该项目,可能会更加合适:结论:将基于社区的痴呆症护理计划调整到康复中心是安全可行的。为确保可行性,有必要对计划进行调整。需要进一步调整和评估相关结果(与痴呆症患者及其家庭护理伙伴相关),以评估该计划在更大范围内的有效性。然而,许多人在探望患有痴呆症的家人时,却不知道该说些什么或做些什么。在安老院中,还没有教导家人如何与痴呆症患者沟通、如何支持他们参与重要的日常生活活动或如何理解行为变化的原因的课程。本文介绍了我们如何将这样一个以证据为基础的项目从社区调整到养老院环境中。我们咨询了痴呆症患者、照护者和家人,发现该计划在这种照护环境中也很有价值。安老院的工作人员介绍说,该计划与安老院通常提供的服务大相径庭,但他们乐观地认为,只要有正确的支持,该计划就能成为支持痴呆症患者及其家人的重要方式。痴呆症院友的家人和实施该计划的治疗师认为,处于安老院生活早期阶段和/或痴呆症早期阶段的院友可以从这些计划中获益最多。我们发现,在干预过程中让家庭成员参与进来,对家庭和院友来说都是有益的,也能增强他们的能力。未来的工作也应侧重于让其他照顾住客的工作人员参与到干预过程中来。工作人员与家属之间的沟通是项目实施和成功的关键,也是将每个人视为一个独立个体的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
期刊最新文献
Driving a motor vehicle and living with a mental health condition: The personal and professional experiences of consumer lived experience staff. Interoception and its application to paediatric occupational therapy: A scoping review. The experiences of rural generalist occupational therapists in provision of palliative care in rural, regional, and remote Australia: A phenomenological inquiry. The responsiveness and clinical utility of the Australian therapy outcome measure for indigenous clients. Online interventions for the mental health and well-being of parents of children with additional needs: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1