The effects of crafts-based interventions on mental health and well-being: A systematic review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Australian Occupational Therapy Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1111/1440-1630.70001
Elise Bromann Bukhave, Jennifer Creek, Anne Kirketerp Linstad, Tove Faber Frandsen
{"title":"The effects of crafts-based interventions on mental health and well-being: A systematic review","authors":"Elise Bromann Bukhave,&nbsp;Jennifer Creek,&nbsp;Anne Kirketerp Linstad,&nbsp;Tove Faber Frandsen","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>A recent upsurge of interest in the health benefits of crafts for mental health and well-being has not been supported by systematic reviews of the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions, prior to this review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Five databases were searched: Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO), APA PsycInfo (EBSCO), Eric (EBSCO), and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. No date limitations were applied. The search was carried out in January 2024 and supplemented by citation searches in June 2024.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The initial search yielded 14,115 papers; the citation search produced 226 additional references. Nineteen studies in total met the inclusion criteria.</p>\n \n <p>Across the 19 studies, there is a wide variety of research designs and a range of crafts used as media for therapy. Interventions were delivered or supervised by either art therapists, nurses, or occupational therapists. Only nine studies report the theoretical basis for the intervention. Treatment duration varies from 10 min to 16 weeks.</p>\n \n <p>Quality assessment revealed the quality of the studies varies considerably, with some studies of high-quality and many suffering from methodological weaknesses. Common issues relating to risk of bias include failure to blind assessors; incomplete data and lack of clarity about how the intervention was administered.</p>\n \n <p>All the studies report short-term improvements in the outcomes measured, which include anxiety, stress, depression, interest in life, self-efficacy, social skills, sociability, mood, well-being, self-esteem, life satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and hopelessness.</p>\n \n <p>Due to the wide variation in interventions, research designs, outcomes, outcome measures, and research quality, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There is some evidence that crafts-based interventions may benefit mental health and well-being, but more high-quality research is needed, including on the mechanisms through which crafts-based interventions operate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and community involvement</h3>\n \n <p>No consumer or community involvement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>Reports from the media suggest that doing crafts may improve mental health. Crafts are, for example, knitting, sewing, and pottery. Therapists have used crafts for years to treat mental illnesses. However, there is no strong proof that these treatments are effective for clients or worth the cost.</p>\n \n <p>This paper reviews the effects of craft-based treatments. The review found 19 studies that looked at whether people felt better after doing crafts. The participants included men and women with various physical, mental, and social problems. These issues included mental disorders, osteoarthritis, epilepsy, and dementia. Pottery, embroidery, knitting, papercraft, and woodwork were used. Some people did crafts for 10 min, while others had several sessions over weeks.</p>\n \n <p>All 19 studies showed that mood and life satisfaction improved after the treatment. But, only one study checked if these improvements lasted in the weeks after.</p>\n \n <p>It is encouraging to see that people feel better after doing crafts. But, these 19 studies together do not prove that the benefits last long-term. More research is needed to get clearer answers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A recent upsurge of interest in the health benefits of crafts for mental health and well-being has not been supported by systematic reviews of the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions, prior to this review.

Methods

Five databases were searched: Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO), APA PsycInfo (EBSCO), Eric (EBSCO), and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. No date limitations were applied. The search was carried out in January 2024 and supplemented by citation searches in June 2024.

Results

The initial search yielded 14,115 papers; the citation search produced 226 additional references. Nineteen studies in total met the inclusion criteria.

Across the 19 studies, there is a wide variety of research designs and a range of crafts used as media for therapy. Interventions were delivered or supervised by either art therapists, nurses, or occupational therapists. Only nine studies report the theoretical basis for the intervention. Treatment duration varies from 10 min to 16 weeks.

Quality assessment revealed the quality of the studies varies considerably, with some studies of high-quality and many suffering from methodological weaknesses. Common issues relating to risk of bias include failure to blind assessors; incomplete data and lack of clarity about how the intervention was administered.

All the studies report short-term improvements in the outcomes measured, which include anxiety, stress, depression, interest in life, self-efficacy, social skills, sociability, mood, well-being, self-esteem, life satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and hopelessness.

Due to the wide variation in interventions, research designs, outcomes, outcome measures, and research quality, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions.

Conclusion

There is some evidence that crafts-based interventions may benefit mental health and well-being, but more high-quality research is needed, including on the mechanisms through which crafts-based interventions operate.

Consumer and community involvement

No consumer or community involvement.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Reports from the media suggest that doing crafts may improve mental health. Crafts are, for example, knitting, sewing, and pottery. Therapists have used crafts for years to treat mental illnesses. However, there is no strong proof that these treatments are effective for clients or worth the cost.

This paper reviews the effects of craft-based treatments. The review found 19 studies that looked at whether people felt better after doing crafts. The participants included men and women with various physical, mental, and social problems. These issues included mental disorders, osteoarthritis, epilepsy, and dementia. Pottery, embroidery, knitting, papercraft, and woodwork were used. Some people did crafts for 10 min, while others had several sessions over weeks.

All 19 studies showed that mood and life satisfaction improved after the treatment. But, only one study checked if these improvements lasted in the weeks after.

It is encouraging to see that people feel better after doing crafts. But, these 19 studies together do not prove that the benefits last long-term. More research is needed to get clearer answers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Advancing occupational therapy scoping reviews: Recommendations to enhance quality and methodological rigour Correction to ‘A systematic review of psychometric properties of questionnaires assessing activities of daily living among older adults with neurocognitive disorders’ The effects of crafts-based interventions on mental health and well-being: A systematic review Assessment of older adults' decision-making capacity for independent living: Findings from a nominal group technique meeting in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1