Assessing the merits: an opinion on the effectiveness of simulation techniques in tumor subclonal reconstruction.

IF 2.4 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Bioinformatics advances Pub Date : 2024-06-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/bioadv/vbae094
Jiaying Lai, Yi Yang, Yunzhou Liu, Robert B Scharpf, Rachel Karchin
{"title":"Assessing the merits: an opinion on the effectiveness of simulation techniques in tumor subclonal reconstruction.","authors":"Jiaying Lai, Yi Yang, Yunzhou Liu, Robert B Scharpf, Rachel Karchin","doi":"10.1093/bioadv/vbae094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Neoplastic tumors originate from a single cell, and their evolution can be traced through lineages characterized by mutations, copy number alterations, and structural variants. These lineages are reconstructed and mapped onto evolutionary trees with algorithmic approaches. However, without ground truth benchmark sets, the validity of an algorithm remains uncertain, limiting potential clinical applicability. With a growing number of algorithms available, there is urgent need for standardized benchmark sets to evaluate their merits. Benchmark sets rely on <i>in silico</i> simulations of tumor sequence, but there are no accepted standards for simulation tools, presenting a major obstacle to progress in this field.</p><p><strong>Availability and implementation: </strong>All analysis done in the paper was based on publicly available data from the publication of each accessed tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":72368,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformatics advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11213631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformatics advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbae094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Neoplastic tumors originate from a single cell, and their evolution can be traced through lineages characterized by mutations, copy number alterations, and structural variants. These lineages are reconstructed and mapped onto evolutionary trees with algorithmic approaches. However, without ground truth benchmark sets, the validity of an algorithm remains uncertain, limiting potential clinical applicability. With a growing number of algorithms available, there is urgent need for standardized benchmark sets to evaluate their merits. Benchmark sets rely on in silico simulations of tumor sequence, but there are no accepted standards for simulation tools, presenting a major obstacle to progress in this field.

Availability and implementation: All analysis done in the paper was based on publicly available data from the publication of each accessed tool.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估优点:对肿瘤亚克隆重建中模拟技术有效性的看法。
摘要:肿瘤起源于单个细胞,其进化可通过以突变、拷贝数改变和结构变异为特征的谱系进行追踪。通过算法方法可将这些谱系重建并映射到进化树上。然而,如果没有基本真实的基准集,算法的有效性仍不确定,从而限制了潜在的临床适用性。随着可用算法的不断增加,迫切需要标准化的基准集来评估这些算法的优劣。基准集依赖于肿瘤序列的硅学模拟,但模拟工具没有公认的标准,这成为该领域取得进展的主要障碍:本文中的所有分析都是基于每种工具出版物中的公开数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
motifbreakR v2: expanded variant analysis including indels and integrated evidence from transcription factor binding databases. TransAnnot-a fast transcriptome annotation pipeline. PatchProt: hydrophobic patch prediction using protein foundation models. Accelerating protein-protein interaction screens with reduced AlphaFold-Multimer sampling. CAPTVRED: an automated pipeline for viral tracking and discovery from capture-based metagenomics samples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1