Multinational evaluation of genetic diversity indicators for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1111/ele.14461
Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Jessica M. da Silva, Catherine E. Grueber, Luis Castillo-Reina, Viktoria Köppä, Brenna R. Forester, W. Chris Funk, Myriam Heuertz, Fumiko Ishihama, Rebecca Jordan, Joachim Mergeay, Ivan Paz-Vinas, Victor Julio Rincon-Parra, Maria Alejandra Rodriguez-Morales, Libertad Arredondo-Amezcua, Gaëlle Brahy, Matt DeSaix, Lily Durkee, Ashley Hamilton, Margaret E. Hunter, Austin Koontz, Iris Lang, María Camila Latorre-Cárdenas, Tanya Latty, Alexander Llanes-Quevedo, Anna J. MacDonald, Meg Mahoney, Caitlin Miller, Juan Francisco Ornelas, Santiago Ramírez-Barahona, Erica Robertson, Isa-Rita M. Russo, Metztli Arcila Santiago, Robyn E. Shaw, Glenn M. Shea, Per Sjögren-Gulve, Emma Suzuki Spence, Taylor Stack, Sofía Suárez, Akio Takenaka, Henrik Thurfjell, Sheela Turbek, Marlien van der Merwe, Fleur Visser, Ana Wegier, Georgina Wood, Eugenia Zarza, Linda Laikre, Sean Hoban
{"title":"Multinational evaluation of genetic diversity indicators for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework","authors":"Alicia Mastretta-Yanes,&nbsp;Jessica M. da Silva,&nbsp;Catherine E. Grueber,&nbsp;Luis Castillo-Reina,&nbsp;Viktoria Köppä,&nbsp;Brenna R. Forester,&nbsp;W. Chris Funk,&nbsp;Myriam Heuertz,&nbsp;Fumiko Ishihama,&nbsp;Rebecca Jordan,&nbsp;Joachim Mergeay,&nbsp;Ivan Paz-Vinas,&nbsp;Victor Julio Rincon-Parra,&nbsp;Maria Alejandra Rodriguez-Morales,&nbsp;Libertad Arredondo-Amezcua,&nbsp;Gaëlle Brahy,&nbsp;Matt DeSaix,&nbsp;Lily Durkee,&nbsp;Ashley Hamilton,&nbsp;Margaret E. Hunter,&nbsp;Austin Koontz,&nbsp;Iris Lang,&nbsp;María Camila Latorre-Cárdenas,&nbsp;Tanya Latty,&nbsp;Alexander Llanes-Quevedo,&nbsp;Anna J. MacDonald,&nbsp;Meg Mahoney,&nbsp;Caitlin Miller,&nbsp;Juan Francisco Ornelas,&nbsp;Santiago Ramírez-Barahona,&nbsp;Erica Robertson,&nbsp;Isa-Rita M. Russo,&nbsp;Metztli Arcila Santiago,&nbsp;Robyn E. Shaw,&nbsp;Glenn M. Shea,&nbsp;Per Sjögren-Gulve,&nbsp;Emma Suzuki Spence,&nbsp;Taylor Stack,&nbsp;Sofía Suárez,&nbsp;Akio Takenaka,&nbsp;Henrik Thurfjell,&nbsp;Sheela Turbek,&nbsp;Marlien van der Merwe,&nbsp;Fleur Visser,&nbsp;Ana Wegier,&nbsp;Georgina Wood,&nbsp;Eugenia Zarza,&nbsp;Linda Laikre,&nbsp;Sean Hoban","doi":"10.1111/ele.14461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Under the recently adopted Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, 196 Parties committed to reporting the status of genetic diversity for all species. To facilitate reporting, three genetic diversity indicators were developed, two of which focus on processes contributing to genetic diversity conservation: maintaining genetically distinct populations and ensuring populations are large enough to maintain genetic diversity. The major advantage of these indicators is that they can be estimated with or without DNA-based data. However, demonstrating their feasibility requires addressing the methodological challenges of using data gathered from diverse sources, across diverse taxonomic groups, and for countries of varying socio-economic status and biodiversity levels. Here, we assess the genetic indicators for 919 taxa, representing 5271 populations across nine countries, including megadiverse countries and developing economies. Eighty-three percent of the taxa assessed had data available to calculate at least one indicator. Our results show that although the majority of species maintain most populations, 58% of species have populations too small to maintain genetic diversity. Moreover, genetic indicator values suggest that IUCN Red List status and other initiatives fail to assess genetic status, highlighting the critical importance of genetic indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"27 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.14461","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14461","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under the recently adopted Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, 196 Parties committed to reporting the status of genetic diversity for all species. To facilitate reporting, three genetic diversity indicators were developed, two of which focus on processes contributing to genetic diversity conservation: maintaining genetically distinct populations and ensuring populations are large enough to maintain genetic diversity. The major advantage of these indicators is that they can be estimated with or without DNA-based data. However, demonstrating their feasibility requires addressing the methodological challenges of using data gathered from diverse sources, across diverse taxonomic groups, and for countries of varying socio-economic status and biodiversity levels. Here, we assess the genetic indicators for 919 taxa, representing 5271 populations across nine countries, including megadiverse countries and developing economies. Eighty-three percent of the taxa assessed had data available to calculate at least one indicator. Our results show that although the majority of species maintain most populations, 58% of species have populations too small to maintain genetic diversity. Moreover, genetic indicator values suggest that IUCN Red List status and other initiatives fail to assess genetic status, highlighting the critical importance of genetic indicators.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架遗传多样性指标的多国评估。
根据最近通过的《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》,196 个缔约方承诺报告所有物种的遗传多样性状况。为便于报告,制定了三个遗传多样性指标,其中两个指标重点关注有助于保护遗传多样性的过程:维持基因独特的种群和确保种群数量足以维持遗传多样性。这些指标的主要优点是,无论是否有 DNA 数据,都可以对其进行估算。然而,要证明这些指标的可行性,就必须解决方法上的难题,即使用从不同来源、不同分类群、不同社会经济地位和生物多样性水平的国家收集的数据。在此,我们评估了 919 个分类群的遗传指标,这些分类群代表了 9 个国家(包括物种丰富的国家和发展中经济体)的 5271 个种群。在接受评估的分类群中,83%的分类群有数据可用来计算至少一个指标。我们的研究结果表明,虽然大多数物种保持着大部分种群,但有 58% 的物种种群太小,无法保持遗传多样性。此外,遗传指标值表明,《世界自然保护联盟红色名录》和其他倡议未能评估遗传状况,这凸显了遗传指标的极端重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Microbial Interactions on Ecosystem Function Intensifies Under Stress Mycorrhizal Types Regulate Tree Spatial Associations in Temperate Forests: Ectomycorrhizal Trees Might Favour Species Coexistence Acclimation Unifies the Scaling of Carbon Assimilation Across Climate Gradients and Levels of Organisation Seasonally Changing Interactions of Species Traits of Termites and Trees Promote Complementarity in Coarse Wood Decomposition Seasonality Structures Avian Functional Diversity and Niche Packing Across North America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1