Brunno F Oliveira,Romain Bertrand,Lise Comte,Jonathan Lenoir,Gaël Grenouillet,Lesley T Lancaster,Jérôme Murienne,Sarah Diamond,Brett R Scheffers,R M W J Bandara,Jake A Lawlor,Nikki A Moore,Barrett W Wolfe,Fabricio Villalobos,Sarah R Weiskopf,Laura M Thompson,Malin L Pinsky,Jonathan Rolland
Climate change threatens biodiversity when species cannot tolerate, adapt to, or track shifting environmental conditions to stay within their climatic niches. A major unresolved question is whether and how species' genetic diversity modulates these dynamics, buffering against range contractions or facilitating range expansions. To test this, we integrated the largest global databases of species range shifts and genetic diversity, encompassing 4673 range shift estimates for 1888 species with available genetic data, including insects, arachnids, birds, fish, and plants. We found that range shifting rates were significantly shaped by the interaction of genetic diversity and climate change velocity. Under rapid warming, species with higher genetic diversity exhibited reduced trailing edge contractions, likely reflecting enhanced evolutionary potential or reduced vulnerability to drift. Under moderate warming, species with higher genetic diversity shifted more rapidly at leading edges and range centroids, consistent with greater colonisation ability. Our study provides evidence that genetic diversity potentially enables persistence at the trailing edge and colonisation at the leading edge, with the magnitude of these effects varying depending on the velocity of climate change.
{"title":"Genetic Diversity Impacts Climate-Induced Species Range Shifts.","authors":"Brunno F Oliveira,Romain Bertrand,Lise Comte,Jonathan Lenoir,Gaël Grenouillet,Lesley T Lancaster,Jérôme Murienne,Sarah Diamond,Brett R Scheffers,R M W J Bandara,Jake A Lawlor,Nikki A Moore,Barrett W Wolfe,Fabricio Villalobos,Sarah R Weiskopf,Laura M Thompson,Malin L Pinsky,Jonathan Rolland","doi":"10.1111/ele.70345","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70345","url":null,"abstract":"Climate change threatens biodiversity when species cannot tolerate, adapt to, or track shifting environmental conditions to stay within their climatic niches. A major unresolved question is whether and how species' genetic diversity modulates these dynamics, buffering against range contractions or facilitating range expansions. To test this, we integrated the largest global databases of species range shifts and genetic diversity, encompassing 4673 range shift estimates for 1888 species with available genetic data, including insects, arachnids, birds, fish, and plants. We found that range shifting rates were significantly shaped by the interaction of genetic diversity and climate change velocity. Under rapid warming, species with higher genetic diversity exhibited reduced trailing edge contractions, likely reflecting enhanced evolutionary potential or reduced vulnerability to drift. Under moderate warming, species with higher genetic diversity shifted more rapidly at leading edges and range centroids, consistent with greater colonisation ability. Our study provides evidence that genetic diversity potentially enables persistence at the trailing edge and colonisation at the leading edge, with the magnitude of these effects varying depending on the velocity of climate change.","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"52 1","pages":"e70345"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147518705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. C. Bitter, S. Greenblum, S. Rajpurohit, A. O. Bergland, J. A. Hemker, E. Lappo, N. J. Betancourt, S. Tilk, S. Berardi, H. Oken, P. Schmidt, D. A. Petrov
Trade‐offs are an inherent feature of organismal biology and fundamental to the evolution of natural populations. Here, we use experimental evolution in large, genetically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster to directly measure the manifestation of trade‐offs in response to fluctuating selection on ecological timescales. We first conducted a lab‐based selection experiment to quantify a genome‐wide signal of fluctuating selection elicited in response to shifting population densities and in the absence of fluctuating abiotic conditions. We then conducted an independent experiment to show that lab‐based manipulations of population density can identify loci relevant to selection during population expansion and collapse in an outdoor setting, where multiple biotic and abiotic conditions fluctuate simultaneously. In concert, our data indicate a role of eco‐evolutionary feedbacks and generic fitness trade‐offs in the maintenance of variation in natural populations and show how a coarse‐grained genetic architecture of adaptation can lead to predictable evolutionary change across settings.
{"title":"Pervasive Fitness Trade‐Offs Revealed by Rapid Adaptation to Shifting Population Densities in Large Experimental Populations of Drosophila melanogaster","authors":"M. C. Bitter, S. Greenblum, S. Rajpurohit, A. O. Bergland, J. A. Hemker, E. Lappo, N. J. Betancourt, S. Tilk, S. Berardi, H. Oken, P. Schmidt, D. A. Petrov","doi":"10.1111/ele.70363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70363","url":null,"abstract":"Trade‐offs are an inherent feature of organismal biology and fundamental to the evolution of natural populations. Here, we use experimental evolution in large, genetically diverse populations of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"> <jats:italic>Drosophila melanogaster</jats:italic> </jats:styled-content> to directly measure the manifestation of trade‐offs in response to fluctuating selection on ecological timescales. We first conducted a lab‐based selection experiment to quantify a genome‐wide signal of fluctuating selection elicited in response to shifting population densities and in the absence of fluctuating abiotic conditions. We then conducted an independent experiment to show that lab‐based manipulations of population density can identify loci relevant to selection during population expansion and collapse in an outdoor setting, where multiple biotic and abiotic conditions fluctuate simultaneously. In concert, our data indicate a role of eco‐evolutionary feedbacks and generic fitness trade‐offs in the maintenance of variation in natural populations and show how a coarse‐grained genetic architecture of adaptation can lead to predictable evolutionary change across settings.","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"405 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147506920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Madeline G Eppley,Andy Lee,Robert Dellinger,Ally Swank
There is ongoing scientific and societal discourse on the definition of biological sex. At this critical moment when misinformation about sex is being applied to policy globally, scientific clarification is valuable. Here, we evaluate the primary approaches to defining sex and synthesise the active discourse to conclude that there is no current consensus on a definition of sex that is free of assumptions and limitations. While there is no current consensus, we do not advocate for a single definition and contend that a lack of unanimity is not inherently problematic. No matter what definitional choices are used, we provide actionable recommendations to improve accuracy when describing sex. Most importantly, regardless of scientific debates, no biological definition of sex should be used to dictate human rights.
{"title":"There is No Consensus on Biological Sex.","authors":"Madeline G Eppley,Andy Lee,Robert Dellinger,Ally Swank","doi":"10.1111/ele.70350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70350","url":null,"abstract":"There is ongoing scientific and societal discourse on the definition of biological sex. At this critical moment when misinformation about sex is being applied to policy globally, scientific clarification is valuable. Here, we evaluate the primary approaches to defining sex and synthesise the active discourse to conclude that there is no current consensus on a definition of sex that is free of assumptions and limitations. While there is no current consensus, we do not advocate for a single definition and contend that a lack of unanimity is not inherently problematic. No matter what definitional choices are used, we provide actionable recommendations to improve accuracy when describing sex. Most importantly, regardless of scientific debates, no biological definition of sex should be used to dictate human rights.","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"14 1","pages":"e70350"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147359075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Oliver Mitesser,Marc W Cadotte,Akira S Mori,Fons van der Plas,Anne Chao,Julia Rothacher,Claus Bässler,Mirjana Bevanda,Peter H W Biedermann,Pia Bradler,Antonio Castañeda-Gómez,Orsi Decker,Benjamin M Delory,Sebastian Dittrich,Heike Feldhaar,Andreas Fichtner,Alexander Kreis,Lisa Köstler-Albert,Ludwig Lettenmaier,Goddert von Oheimb,Luisa Pflumm,Kerstin Pierick,Jakob Schwalb-Willmann,Simon Thorn,Leah Vogelfänger,Wolfgang Weisser,Martin Wegmann,Clara Wild,Jörg Müller
Metacommunity theory has expanded our understanding of how spatial dynamics and local interactions influence species communities. Different assembly archetypes, reflecting different roles of species differences, habitat differences, and dispersal have been described, but we lack empirical studies specifically in terrestrial habitats testing which archetype is most important. In a replicated design, we experimentally enhanced structural between-patch heterogeneity in homogeneous production forests and developed a statistical framework controlling for sample incompleteness to detect different metacommunity processes. Meta-analyses on > 100 K individuals of > 1.3 K beetle species showed an increase of ~60 species in heterogenized forests at γ-level promoted by increasing α-diversity consistent with the mass-effect and an increase of β-diversity by ~10% supporting species-sorting. Additionally, we tested β-deviations from random assembly as a proxy of neutral processes. Findings indicate that enhancing structural heterogeneity can shift forests from patch-dynamics dominance towards mass-effect and species-sorting, offering a promising pathway to restore biodiversity in managed landscapes.
{"title":"Forest Heterogeneity by Chain Saw: How Between-Patch Variation in Old Growth Attributes Changes the Metacommunities of Beetles.","authors":"Oliver Mitesser,Marc W Cadotte,Akira S Mori,Fons van der Plas,Anne Chao,Julia Rothacher,Claus Bässler,Mirjana Bevanda,Peter H W Biedermann,Pia Bradler,Antonio Castañeda-Gómez,Orsi Decker,Benjamin M Delory,Sebastian Dittrich,Heike Feldhaar,Andreas Fichtner,Alexander Kreis,Lisa Köstler-Albert,Ludwig Lettenmaier,Goddert von Oheimb,Luisa Pflumm,Kerstin Pierick,Jakob Schwalb-Willmann,Simon Thorn,Leah Vogelfänger,Wolfgang Weisser,Martin Wegmann,Clara Wild,Jörg Müller","doi":"10.1111/ele.70355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70355","url":null,"abstract":"Metacommunity theory has expanded our understanding of how spatial dynamics and local interactions influence species communities. Different assembly archetypes, reflecting different roles of species differences, habitat differences, and dispersal have been described, but we lack empirical studies specifically in terrestrial habitats testing which archetype is most important. In a replicated design, we experimentally enhanced structural between-patch heterogeneity in homogeneous production forests and developed a statistical framework controlling for sample incompleteness to detect different metacommunity processes. Meta-analyses on > 100 K individuals of > 1.3 K beetle species showed an increase of ~60 species in heterogenized forests at γ-level promoted by increasing α-diversity consistent with the mass-effect and an increase of β-diversity by ~10% supporting species-sorting. Additionally, we tested β-deviations from random assembly as a proxy of neutral processes. Findings indicate that enhancing structural heterogeneity can shift forests from patch-dynamics dominance towards mass-effect and species-sorting, offering a promising pathway to restore biodiversity in managed landscapes.","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"198 1","pages":"e70355"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147359076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Graham A Montgomery, Eliza M Grames, Jake M Jacobsen, Ethan X Kahn, Amanda Leyel, Mia C Rosati, Qiyuan Wu, Chris S Elphick, David Wagner, Morgan W Tingley
The determinants of population variability across taxa, time, and space are not fully understood, particularly for insects, a group with recent reports of widespread abundance declines. We collated data from unpublished and published sources to calculate indices of interannual population variability for over 4500 unique insect time series, comprising data from nearly 1500 species. We evaluate whether insects exhibit greater population variability than other types of animals. Our results demonstrate that insects as a group indeed exhibit much greater population variability than birds, mammals, or fish, but that within Insecta, included orders show similar levels of population variability. We also find that population variability in insects is greater at higher latitudes, for species with smaller body sizes and for shorter, older time series and that it varies between biomes. Overall, our findings can inform the interpretation and prediction of insect population trends, fluctuations and extinction risk in an era of insect decline.
{"title":"Are Insect Populations Inherently More Variable? A Multi-Taxa Approach to Characterising Interannual Fluctuations in Insect Time Series.","authors":"Graham A Montgomery, Eliza M Grames, Jake M Jacobsen, Ethan X Kahn, Amanda Leyel, Mia C Rosati, Qiyuan Wu, Chris S Elphick, David Wagner, Morgan W Tingley","doi":"10.1111/ele.70359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The determinants of population variability across taxa, time, and space are not fully understood, particularly for insects, a group with recent reports of widespread abundance declines. We collated data from unpublished and published sources to calculate indices of interannual population variability for over 4500 unique insect time series, comprising data from nearly 1500 species. We evaluate whether insects exhibit greater population variability than other types of animals. Our results demonstrate that insects as a group indeed exhibit much greater population variability than birds, mammals, or fish, but that within Insecta, included orders show similar levels of population variability. We also find that population variability in insects is greater at higher latitudes, for species with smaller body sizes and for shorter, older time series and that it varies between biomes. Overall, our findings can inform the interpretation and prediction of insect population trends, fluctuations and extinction risk in an era of insect decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"29 3","pages":"e70359"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147484022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Data synthesised and published as response ratios in ecology ( , or ratio of means, ) remain isolated from broad secondary analyses because they cannot be converted to other effect size metrics. Here I address this lack of data interoperability by developing a conversion to the widely used Hedges' (standardised mean difference, ). This conversion is practical and near exact-as long as assumptions of homogeneity of variances are met, Hedges' correction is used to adjust for small-sample bias, and only additive and not multiplicative ecological processes are converted. I then generalise this conversion with abstract algebra to develop additional opportunities to reuse effect sizes-first by stating the response ratio as a geometric construction of Pythagorean means, and then as a proportional compass-and-straightedge construction of the response ratio. Constructability is a new pathway of interoperability for effect sizes, and without collecting new data, allows for the response ratio and to be repurposed into relative change datatypes such as the arithmetic, harmonic, geometric, quadratic and logarithmic means. Much of what has been synthesised in ecology is only available as response ratios, and I hope these conversions increase their value post-publication and facilitate reuse for bolder, more comprehensive meta-analyses.
作为生态学响应比(lnRR $$ mathrm{lnRR} $$或均值比,RoM $$ mathrm{RoM} $$)合成和发表的数据仍然与广泛的二次分析分离,因为它们不能转换为其他效应大小指标。在这里,我通过开发到广泛使用的Hedges' d $$ d $$(标准化平均差,SMD $$ mathrm{SMD} $$)的转换来解决这种数据互操作性的缺乏。这种转换是实际的和接近精确的——只要方差的同质性假设得到满足,赫奇斯的g $$ g $$校正用于调整小样本偏差,并且只转换加性而不转换乘法生态过程。然后,我用抽象代数来概括这种转换,以开发重用效应大小的额外机会——首先将响应比描述为毕达哥拉斯均值的几何结构,然后将d $$ d $$描述为响应比的比例罗盘和直线结构。可构造性是效应大小互操作性的新途径,在不收集新数据的情况下,允许将响应比和d $$ d $$重新用于相对变化的数据类型,如算术、谐波、几何、二次和对数均值。在生态学中合成的许多东西只能以响应比率的形式获得,我希望这些转换能在发表后增加它们的价值,并促进更大胆、更全面的元分析的再利用。
{"title":"Converting and Constructing Effect Sizes With the Response Ratio.","authors":"Marc J Lajeunesse","doi":"10.1111/ele.70335","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ele.70335","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data synthesised and published as response ratios in ecology ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mtext>lnRR</mtext></mrow> <annotation>$$ mathrm{lnRR} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , or ratio of means, <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>RoM</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ mathrm{RoM} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) remain isolated from broad secondary analyses because they cannot be converted to other effect size metrics. Here I address this lack of data interoperability by developing a conversion to the widely used Hedges' <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ d $$</annotation></semantics> </math> (standardised mean difference, <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>SMD</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ mathrm{SMD} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). This conversion is practical and near exact-as long as assumptions of homogeneity of variances are met, Hedges' <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>g</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ g $$</annotation></semantics> </math> correction is used to adjust for small-sample bias, and only additive and not multiplicative ecological processes are converted. I then generalise this conversion with abstract algebra to develop additional opportunities to reuse effect sizes-first by stating the response ratio as a geometric construction of Pythagorean means, and then <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ d $$</annotation></semantics> </math> as a proportional compass-and-straightedge construction of the response ratio. Constructability is a new pathway of interoperability for effect sizes, and without collecting new data, allows for the response ratio and <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ d $$</annotation></semantics> </math> to be repurposed into relative change datatypes such as the arithmetic, harmonic, geometric, quadratic and logarithmic means. Much of what has been synthesised in ecology is only available as response ratios, and I hope these conversions increase their value post-publication and facilitate reuse for bolder, more comprehensive meta-analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"29 3","pages":"e70335"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147484012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Markus Bittlingmaier,Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo,Santiago Soliveres,Grégoire T Freschet
Plant-plant interactions shape community composition and functional trait structure, key drivers of ecosystem functioning. Environmental conditions can modify these interactions, yet how they alter the competition-facilitation balance and its intransitivity (non-hierarchical interactions), and with what consequences for ecosystem functioning, remains unknown. To address this, we conducted a grassland mesocosm experiment manipulating drought and whole-soil inoculation. Drought increased both competition and intransitivity, while whole-soil inoculation decreased them. Reduced competition and higher intransitivity enhanced ecosystem multifunctionality by increasing plant productivity and soil hydraulic conductivity, with minimal effects on soil nutrient cycling. Dominant species shaped the competition-facilitation balance and intransitivity in opposite ways, which explains their contrasting effects on ecosystem functioning. These outcomes were partly independent of functional diversity (frequently interpreted analogous to resource-use complementarity) and species relative abundance effects, showing that the competition-facilitation balance and intransitivity capture aspects of plant-plant interaction structure not resolved by commonly used diversity-function metrics.
{"title":"Plant Competitive Balance and Intransitivity Shape Ecosystem Multifunctionality in Grasslands Under Drought.","authors":"Markus Bittlingmaier,Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo,Santiago Soliveres,Grégoire T Freschet","doi":"10.1111/ele.70354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70354","url":null,"abstract":"Plant-plant interactions shape community composition and functional trait structure, key drivers of ecosystem functioning. Environmental conditions can modify these interactions, yet how they alter the competition-facilitation balance and its intransitivity (non-hierarchical interactions), and with what consequences for ecosystem functioning, remains unknown. To address this, we conducted a grassland mesocosm experiment manipulating drought and whole-soil inoculation. Drought increased both competition and intransitivity, while whole-soil inoculation decreased them. Reduced competition and higher intransitivity enhanced ecosystem multifunctionality by increasing plant productivity and soil hydraulic conductivity, with minimal effects on soil nutrient cycling. Dominant species shaped the competition-facilitation balance and intransitivity in opposite ways, which explains their contrasting effects on ecosystem functioning. These outcomes were partly independent of functional diversity (frequently interpreted analogous to resource-use complementarity) and species relative abundance effects, showing that the competition-facilitation balance and intransitivity capture aspects of plant-plant interaction structure not resolved by commonly used diversity-function metrics.","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"249 1","pages":"e70354"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147350308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Falko T Buschke, Daryl Codron, Robert M Pringle, Jürg Spaak
Modern Coexistence Theory (MCT) has long aimed to predict community structure, but empirical support remains scattered across unconnected case-studies from a narrow subset of systems where it is possible to quantify niche and fitness differences (e.g., pairwise interactions between fast-growing plants or protists). We sought a framework to apply MCT to a broader range of ecological scenarios by combining eDNA dietary data with life-history traits of mammal herbivores from diverse communities across three African savannas. Although this first application of the framework treated dietary niche differentiation as the sole mechanism for coexistence, it unveiled three conclusions about multispecies coexistence. First, dietary niche differentiation promoted coexistence but was insufficient to explain observed coexistence for all species. Second, modelled coexistence patterns in herbivore communities could not be predicted from species-level traits or pairwise comparisons. Third, herbivore diversity is generally robust to reductions in the number of plant resources, particularly when there is more dietary specialisation.
{"title":"A Theoretical Framework for Multispecies Coexistence in Large Herbivores Based on Functional Traits and Dietary Data.","authors":"Falko T Buschke, Daryl Codron, Robert M Pringle, Jürg Spaak","doi":"10.1111/ele.70365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70365","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern Coexistence Theory (MCT) has long aimed to predict community structure, but empirical support remains scattered across unconnected case-studies from a narrow subset of systems where it is possible to quantify niche and fitness differences (e.g., pairwise interactions between fast-growing plants or protists). We sought a framework to apply MCT to a broader range of ecological scenarios by combining eDNA dietary data with life-history traits of mammal herbivores from diverse communities across three African savannas. Although this first application of the framework treated dietary niche differentiation as the sole mechanism for coexistence, it unveiled three conclusions about multispecies coexistence. First, dietary niche differentiation promoted coexistence but was insufficient to explain observed coexistence for all species. Second, modelled coexistence patterns in herbivore communities could not be predicted from species-level traits or pairwise comparisons. Third, herbivore diversity is generally robust to reductions in the number of plant resources, particularly when there is more dietary specialisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"29 3","pages":"e70365"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147472146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
John P DeLong, Kyle E Coblentz, Kristi L Montooth, Qingqing Yang, Dinelka Thilakarathne, Francis Biagioli
Stability selection is the process by which species are lost from a community due to a structural susceptibility to extinction. Stability selection is non-adaptive because it does not lead to the evolution of traits that increase individual fitness. However, stability selection could still drive evolutionary change because the stability of populations is linked to heritable traits. Here we demonstrate both phenomena with a live predator-prey system. We show that the stability properties of a predator-prey pair vary with prey genetics, indicating the potential for differential extinction to influence the genotypic makeup of populations. Second, we show that the loss of unstable predator-prey pairs in subpopulations from the overall population can lead to trait evolution in the aggregate population, providing empirical support for the stability selection mechanism. Our results indicate that community-level processes such as predator-prey interactions can generate eco-evolutionary change at the population scale.
{"title":"Evidence for the Stability Selection Mechanism in a Live Predator-Prey System.","authors":"John P DeLong, Kyle E Coblentz, Kristi L Montooth, Qingqing Yang, Dinelka Thilakarathne, Francis Biagioli","doi":"10.1111/ele.70367","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ele.70367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stability selection is the process by which species are lost from a community due to a structural susceptibility to extinction. Stability selection is non-adaptive because it does not lead to the evolution of traits that increase individual fitness. However, stability selection could still drive evolutionary change because the stability of populations is linked to heritable traits. Here we demonstrate both phenomena with a live predator-prey system. We show that the stability properties of a predator-prey pair vary with prey genetics, indicating the potential for differential extinction to influence the genotypic makeup of populations. Second, we show that the loss of unstable predator-prey pairs in subpopulations from the overall population can lead to trait evolution in the aggregate population, providing empirical support for the stability selection mechanism. Our results indicate that community-level processes such as predator-prey interactions can generate eco-evolutionary change at the population scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"29 3","pages":"e70367"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13003581/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147484078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although habitat area and isolation are considered key factors influencing plant disease and herbivory, their specific mechanisms remain underexplored within island biogeography. We investigated the direct and indirect effects (via community functional traits) of island area and isolation on plant disease and herbivory across 21 tropical islands in the South China Sea. Community-weighted mean leaf area (CWM LA) was the most significant functional predictor at the community level. Decomposing CWM LA revealed isolation primarily drove species turnover (LA_STE; 99.99% of the relative explanatory power), whereas area mainly influenced intraspecific variation (LA_ITV; 60.42% of the relative explanatory power). Isolation-mediated species turnover indirectly amplified disease and herbivory, likely through adaptive trait shifts favouring resource acquisition. Island area had no significant effect on disease and herbivory at the community level. This study reveals the complex roles of area and isolation in plant biotic risks, underscoring the utility of island biogeography theory.
{"title":"Distinguishing the Direct and Indirect Effects of Island Area and Isolation in Regulating Plant Disease and Herbivory in Tropical Islands.","authors":"Hao Qin, Xiang Liu, Yikang Cheng, Shurong Zhou","doi":"10.1111/ele.70369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70369","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although habitat area and isolation are considered key factors influencing plant disease and herbivory, their specific mechanisms remain underexplored within island biogeography. We investigated the direct and indirect effects (via community functional traits) of island area and isolation on plant disease and herbivory across 21 tropical islands in the South China Sea. Community-weighted mean leaf area (CWM LA) was the most significant functional predictor at the community level. Decomposing CWM LA revealed isolation primarily drove species turnover (LA_STE; 99.99% of the relative explanatory power), whereas area mainly influenced intraspecific variation (LA_ITV; 60.42% of the relative explanatory power). Isolation-mediated species turnover indirectly amplified disease and herbivory, likely through adaptive trait shifts favouring resource acquisition. Island area had no significant effect on disease and herbivory at the community level. This study reveals the complex roles of area and isolation in plant biotic risks, underscoring the utility of island biogeography theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"29 3","pages":"e70369"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}