The influence of prior COVID-19 diagnosis on concussion recovery outcomes.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical focus Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.4.FOCUS24131
Allie J Tracey, Megan C Loftin, Aaron J Zynda, Alyssa M Pollard-McGrandy, Lilian A Klein, Tracey Covassin
{"title":"The influence of prior COVID-19 diagnosis on concussion recovery outcomes.","authors":"Allie J Tracey, Megan C Loftin, Aaron J Zynda, Alyssa M Pollard-McGrandy, Lilian A Klein, Tracey Covassin","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.FOCUS24131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While the clinical presentations of COVID-19 and concussion are not identical, there is a significant overlap in symptomology (e.g., fatigue, headache) and neurological deficits (e.g., cognitive, vestibular). However, limited research has examined the effect of prior COVID-19 diagnosis on concussion outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if prior diagnosis of COVID-19 influences concussion outcomes, including concussion assessment scores and recovery time, in college-aged individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study of college-aged individuals (COVID-19: n = 43, mean age 21.3 [SD 2.5] years; no COVID-19: n = 51, mean age 21.0 [SD 2.5] years) diagnosed with concussion was conducted. Demographics, injury details, the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition (SCAT5), and the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) were completed at the acute (within 5 days after concussion) and full medical clearance (FMC) (within 3 days after FMC) visits. Mann-Whitney U-tests determined differences in concussion outcomes between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to assess the relationship between factors associated with concussion symptom resolution and days to FMC, and covariates were selected based on previous literature indicating potential confounds (e.g., female sex, acute symptom severity, preexisting mental health conditions). Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were reported for each predictor variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between groups for SCAT5 and VOMS composite and total scores. Significant differences were found between COVID-19 and no-COVID-19 groups in days to symptom resolution (11.5 days vs 8 days, p = 0.021), but not in days to FMC (14 days vs 12 days, p = 0.099). The association between COVID-19 groups and days to clearance was not significant when adjusting for sex, race, history of depression/anxiety, and total number of concussion symptoms at the acute visit [χ2(5) = 8.349, p = 0.138]. However, male sex (HR 2.036, 95% CI 1.033-4.014; p = 0.040) was associated with a quicker time to FMC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prior COVID-19 diagnosis did not influence cognitive abilities and vestibular/ocular functioning as measured by the SCAT5 and VOMS postconcussion. While prior COVID-19 diagnosis did result in a significantly longer duration to symptom resolution when compared with individuals who did not have a prior COVID-19 diagnosis, prior COVID-19 did not significantly influence time to FMC by a healthcare provider. Clinicians should consider that individuals with a prior diagnosis of COVID-19 might experience prolonged symptoms postconcussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.4.FOCUS24131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While the clinical presentations of COVID-19 and concussion are not identical, there is a significant overlap in symptomology (e.g., fatigue, headache) and neurological deficits (e.g., cognitive, vestibular). However, limited research has examined the effect of prior COVID-19 diagnosis on concussion outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if prior diagnosis of COVID-19 influences concussion outcomes, including concussion assessment scores and recovery time, in college-aged individuals.

Methods: A prospective study of college-aged individuals (COVID-19: n = 43, mean age 21.3 [SD 2.5] years; no COVID-19: n = 51, mean age 21.0 [SD 2.5] years) diagnosed with concussion was conducted. Demographics, injury details, the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition (SCAT5), and the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) were completed at the acute (within 5 days after concussion) and full medical clearance (FMC) (within 3 days after FMC) visits. Mann-Whitney U-tests determined differences in concussion outcomes between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to assess the relationship between factors associated with concussion symptom resolution and days to FMC, and covariates were selected based on previous literature indicating potential confounds (e.g., female sex, acute symptom severity, preexisting mental health conditions). Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were reported for each predictor variable.

Results: No significant differences were found between groups for SCAT5 and VOMS composite and total scores. Significant differences were found between COVID-19 and no-COVID-19 groups in days to symptom resolution (11.5 days vs 8 days, p = 0.021), but not in days to FMC (14 days vs 12 days, p = 0.099). The association between COVID-19 groups and days to clearance was not significant when adjusting for sex, race, history of depression/anxiety, and total number of concussion symptoms at the acute visit [χ2(5) = 8.349, p = 0.138]. However, male sex (HR 2.036, 95% CI 1.033-4.014; p = 0.040) was associated with a quicker time to FMC.

Conclusions: Prior COVID-19 diagnosis did not influence cognitive abilities and vestibular/ocular functioning as measured by the SCAT5 and VOMS postconcussion. While prior COVID-19 diagnosis did result in a significantly longer duration to symptom resolution when compared with individuals who did not have a prior COVID-19 diagnosis, prior COVID-19 did not significantly influence time to FMC by a healthcare provider. Clinicians should consider that individuals with a prior diagnosis of COVID-19 might experience prolonged symptoms postconcussion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
之前的 COVID-19 诊断对脑震荡康复结果的影响。
目的:虽然 COVID-19 和脑震荡的临床表现不尽相同,但在症状(如疲劳、头痛)和神经功能缺损(如认知、前庭)方面有明显的重叠。然而,对之前 COVID-19 诊断对脑震荡结果影响的研究却很有限。因此,本研究旨在确定先前的 COVID-19 诊断是否会影响大学生的脑震荡结果,包括脑震荡评估分数和恢复时间:对确诊为脑震荡的大学生(COVID-19:n = 43,平均年龄 21.3 [SD 2.5]岁;无 COVID-19:n = 51,平均年龄 21.0 [SD 2.5]岁)进行前瞻性研究。在急性期(脑震荡后 5 天内)和完全医疗检查(FMC)(FMC 后 3 天内)完成了人口统计学、受伤详情、运动脑震荡评估工具第 5 版(SCAT5)和前庭/眼球运动筛查(VOMS)。Mann-Whitney U 检验确定了组间脑震荡结果的差异。为了评估与脑震荡症状缓解和完全康复就诊天数相关的因素之间的关系,我们拟合了 Cox 比例危险回归模型,并根据以往表明潜在混杂因素(如女性性别、急性症状严重程度、既往精神健康状况)的文献选择了协变量。报告了每个预测变量的危险比和 95% 的置信区间:在 SCAT5 和 VOMS 综合得分和总分方面,各组之间没有发现明显差异。COVID-19组与无COVID-19组在症状缓解天数上存在显著差异(11.5天 vs 8天,p = 0.021),但在FMC天数上无显著差异(14天 vs 12天,p = 0.099)。在调整性别、种族、抑郁/焦虑病史和急性就诊时脑震荡症状总数后,COVID-19 组别与症状消除天数之间的关系并不显著[χ2(5) = 8.349, p = 0.138]。然而,男性性别(HR 2.036,95% CI 1.033-4.014;p = 0.040)与更快的FMC时间相关:结论:根据脑震荡后 SCAT5 和 VOMS 测量,之前的 COVID-19 诊断不会影响认知能力和前庭/眼功能。与未确诊过 COVID-19 的患者相比,确诊过 COVID-19 的患者症状缓解的时间明显更长,但确诊过 COVID-19 的患者接受医疗服务的时间并未受到明显影响。临床医生应考虑到,之前诊断出 COVID-19 的患者可能会在脑震荡后经历较长时间的症状缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
3-T MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for tremor in patients with a cardiac pacemaker: case series and review of the literature. A review of sonodynamic therapy for brain tumors. A systematic review of focused ultrasound for psychiatric disorders: current applications, opportunities, and challenges. Brain targeting for focused ultrasound essential tremor ablation: proceedings from the 2023 Focused Ultrasound Foundation workshop. Focused ultrasound for the treatment of facet joint pain: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1