Effect of COVID-19 on Continuing Education Activities and Learner Interactions: Report from Six Accreditation Systems.

Journal of CME Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/28338073.2024.2370746
Kate Regnier, Amy Smith, Jean-Philippe Natali, Siritio Berthe, Reinhard Griebenow, Robert Schaefer, Joerg Stein, Essam Elsayed, Michel Smith
{"title":"Effect of COVID-19 on Continuing Education Activities and Learner Interactions: Report from Six Accreditation Systems.","authors":"Kate Regnier, Amy Smith, Jean-Philippe Natali, Siritio Berthe, Reinhard Griebenow, Robert Schaefer, Joerg Stein, Essam Elsayed, Michel Smith","doi":"10.1080/28338073.2024.2370746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has had disruptive effects on all parts of the health-care system, including the continuing education (CE) landscape. This report documents, what has happened in six different CE accreditation systems to CE activities as well as learners. Complete lockdown periods in the first part of the COVID-19 pandemic have inevitably led to reductions in numbers of the then predominant format of education, i.e. onsite in-person meetings. However, with impressive speed CE providers have switched to online educational formats. With regard to learner interactions this has compensated, and in some systems even overcompensated, the loss of in-person educational opportunities. Thus, our data convincingly demonstrate the resilience of CPD in times of a global health crisis and offer important insights in how CPD might become more effective in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":73675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of CME","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/28338073.2024.2370746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had disruptive effects on all parts of the health-care system, including the continuing education (CE) landscape. This report documents, what has happened in six different CE accreditation systems to CE activities as well as learners. Complete lockdown periods in the first part of the COVID-19 pandemic have inevitably led to reductions in numbers of the then predominant format of education, i.e. onsite in-person meetings. However, with impressive speed CE providers have switched to online educational formats. With regard to learner interactions this has compensated, and in some systems even overcompensated, the loss of in-person educational opportunities. Thus, our data convincingly demonstrate the resilience of CPD in times of a global health crisis and offer important insights in how CPD might become more effective in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 对继续教育活动和学员互动的影响:来自六个认证系统的报告。
COVID-19 大流行对医疗保健系统的各个部分都产生了破坏性影响,包括继续教育(CE)领域。本报告记录了六个不同的继续教育认证系统对继续教育活动和学员造成的影响。COVID-19 大流行初期的全面封锁期不可避免地导致了当时占主导地位的教育形式(即现场面授会议)数量的减少。然而,CE 提供商以惊人的速度转向了在线教育形式。在学员互动方面,这弥补了现场教育机会的损失,在某些系统中甚至是过度补偿。因此,我们的数据令人信服地证明了继续教育在全球卫生危机时期的恢复能力,并为今后如何提高继续教育的效率提供了重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Multiple-Choice Question Formats in a First Year Medical Physiology Course. Using the Jigsaw Method to Improve Resident Confidence and Medical Knowledge About Osteoporosis in Men. Transforming Continuing Professional Development for Healthcare Professionals to Meet National Goals in Saudi Arabia. Effect of COVID-19 on Continuing Education Activities and Learner Interactions: Report from Six Accreditation Systems. Impact of Educational Activity Formats, Online or In-Person, on the Intention of Medical Specialists to Adopt a Clinical Behaviour: A Comparative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1