Biomechanical characterization of cadaveric brachial plexus regions using uniaxial tensile tests

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Hand Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101747
{"title":"Biomechanical characterization of cadaveric brachial plexus regions using uniaxial tensile tests","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>The proximal regions of the brachial plexus<span><span> (roots, trunks) are more susceptible to permanent damage due to stretch injuries than the distal regions (cords, terminal branches). A better description of brachial </span>plexus mechanical </span></span>behavior is necessary to better understand deformation mechanisms in stretch injury.</p><p>The purpose of this study was to model the biomechanical behavior of each portion of the brachial plexus (roots, trunks, cords, peripheral nerves) in a cadaveric model and report differences in elastic modulus, maximum stress and maximum strain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight cadaveric plexi, divided into 47 segments according to regions of interest, underwent cyclical uniaxial tensile tests, using a BOSE® Electroforce® 3330 and INSTRON® 5969 material testing machines, to obtain the stress and strain histories of each specimen.</p><p>Maximum stress, maximum strain and elastic modulus were extracted from the load–displacement and stress–strain curves.</p><p>Statistical analyses used 1-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) and Mann-Whitney tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean elastic modulus was 8.65 MPa for roots, 8.82 MPa for trunks, 22.44 MPa for cords, and 26.43 MPa for peripheral nerves. Differences in elastic modulus and in maximum stress were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001) between proximal (roots, trunks) and distal (cords, peripheral nerves) specimens.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Proximal structures demonstrated significantly smaller elastic modulus and maximum stress than distal structures. These data confirm the greater fragility of proximal regions of the brachial plexus.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54301,"journal":{"name":"Hand Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"43 4","pages":"Article 101747"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468122924001622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The proximal regions of the brachial plexus (roots, trunks) are more susceptible to permanent damage due to stretch injuries than the distal regions (cords, terminal branches). A better description of brachial plexus mechanical behavior is necessary to better understand deformation mechanisms in stretch injury.

The purpose of this study was to model the biomechanical behavior of each portion of the brachial plexus (roots, trunks, cords, peripheral nerves) in a cadaveric model and report differences in elastic modulus, maximum stress and maximum strain.

Methods

Eight cadaveric plexi, divided into 47 segments according to regions of interest, underwent cyclical uniaxial tensile tests, using a BOSE® Electroforce® 3330 and INSTRON® 5969 material testing machines, to obtain the stress and strain histories of each specimen.

Maximum stress, maximum strain and elastic modulus were extracted from the load–displacement and stress–strain curves.

Statistical analyses used 1-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) and Mann-Whitney tests.

Results

Mean elastic modulus was 8.65 MPa for roots, 8.82 MPa for trunks, 22.44 MPa for cords, and 26.43 MPa for peripheral nerves. Differences in elastic modulus and in maximum stress were statistically significant (p < 0.001) between proximal (roots, trunks) and distal (cords, peripheral nerves) specimens.

Conclusions

Proximal structures demonstrated significantly smaller elastic modulus and maximum stress than distal structures. These data confirm the greater fragility of proximal regions of the brachial plexus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用单轴拉伸试验确定尸体臂丛神经区域的生物力学特征。
简介:臂丛神经的近端区域(根、干)比远端区域(索、末端分支)更容易因拉伸损伤而造成永久性损伤。为了更好地了解拉伸损伤的变形机制,有必要更好地描述臂丛神经的机械行为。本研究的目的是在尸体模型中模拟臂丛各部分(根、干、索、周围神经)的生物力学行为,并报告弹性模量、最大应力和最大应变的差异:方法:使用 BOSE® Electroforce® 3330 和 INSTRON® 5969 材料试验机对 8 个尸体神经丛(根据感兴趣的区域分为 47 个部分)进行周期性单轴拉伸试验,以获得每个样本的应力和应变历史。从载荷-位移和应力-应变曲线中提取最大应力、最大应变和弹性模量。统计分析采用了单因素方差分析,以及事后的 Tukey HSD(诚实显著差异)和 Mann-Whitney 检验:结果:根的平均弹性模量为 8.65 兆帕,干为 8.82 兆帕,索为 22.44 兆帕,周围神经为 26.43 兆帕。弹性模量和最大应力的差异具有显著的统计学意义(p 结论:弹性模量和最大应力的差异具有显著的统计学意义:近端结构的弹性模量和最大应力明显小于远端结构。这些数据证实了臂丛近端区域更加脆弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the French, Belgian and Swiss Societies for Surgery of the Hand, as well as of the French Society of Rehabilitation of the Hand & Upper Limb, ''Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation'' - formerly named "Chirurgie de la Main" - publishes original articles, literature reviews, technical notes, and clinical cases. It is indexed in the main international databases (including Medline). Initially a platform for French-speaking hand surgeons, the journal will now publish its articles in English to disseminate its author''s scientific findings more widely. The journal also includes a biannual supplement in French, the monograph of the French Society for Surgery of the Hand, where comprehensive reviews in the fields of hand, peripheral nerve and upper limb surgery are presented. Organe officiel de la Société française de chirurgie de la main, de la Société française de Rééducation de la main (SFRM-GEMMSOR), de la Société suisse de chirurgie de la main et du Belgian Hand Group, indexée dans les grandes bases de données internationales (Medline, Embase, Pascal, Scopus), Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation - anciennement titrée Chirurgie de la main - publie des articles originaux, des revues de la littérature, des notes techniques, des cas clinique. Initialement plateforme d''expression francophone de la spécialité, la revue s''oriente désormais vers l''anglais pour devenir une référence scientifique et de formation de la spécialité en France et en Europe. Avec 6 publications en anglais par an, la revue comprend également un supplément biannuel, la monographie du GEM, où sont présentées en français, des mises au point complètes dans les domaines de la chirurgie de la main, des nerfs périphériques et du membre supérieur.
期刊最新文献
Contents Morbidity associated with pre-hospital upper-limb tourniquet in civilian trauma: a case series Catch the shift: Ultrasound diagnosis of scapholunate lesion during Watson test ChatGPT: A concise Google alternative for people seeking accurate and comprehensive carpal tunnel syndrome information Ultrasound-based Measurement of the Intra-scaphoid angle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1