Feasibility and early oncologic outcomes of Total Intracorporeal Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Vaginal Cerclage (TIRRHVC) for the treatment of clinical stage IB cervical cancer: A tumor containment technique

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2024.101437
Lauren Lim , April Slee , Peter C. Lim
{"title":"Feasibility and early oncologic outcomes of Total Intracorporeal Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Vaginal Cerclage (TIRRHVC) for the treatment of clinical stage IB cervical cancer: A tumor containment technique","authors":"Lauren Lim ,&nbsp;April Slee ,&nbsp;Peter C. Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) has been reported to have a four-fold increase in recurrence compared to open radical hysterectomy (ORH) for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. The cause for the inferior outcomes with MIRH is unclear. However, the use of a uterine manipulator and the lack of tumor containment strategies may contribute to tumor seeding in previous MIRH approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Determine the feasibility and early oncologic outcomes of a novel robotic-assisted surgical technique for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer, Total Intracorporeal Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Vaginal Cerclage (TIRRHVC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six patients between 2018 and 2022 underwent the TIRRHVC procedure after being counseled on the risks and benefits of ORH and TIRRHVC; these 26 patients’ demographics, clinical, surgical, and oncologic outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Seventeen patients (65.4 %) had clinical stage IB1 and 9 (34.6 %) were IB2 cervical cancer according to FIGO 2018 guidelines. Following hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy, 4 patients were upstaged. The average pathologic tumor size was 2.66 cm (0 cm – 5.6 cm); 65 % of tumors were &gt; 2 cm. There were no intraoperative complications. There were 13 postoperative complications, including 10 urinary tract infections. Eleven patients (42.3 %) received adjuvant therapy. The average follow-up period was 2.8 years (IQR 2.3–3.6). Only one patient has recurred at 3.6 years. One patient expired from causes unrelated to gynecologic cancer. The 3-year disease free survival is 95.5 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These promising early oncologic outcomes are encouraging that TIRRHVC may be a treatment option that offers the benefits of minimally invasive surgery without compromising oncologic outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001164/pdfft?md5=b8468c4490e59f82c4f3f8d9be989128&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001164-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) has been reported to have a four-fold increase in recurrence compared to open radical hysterectomy (ORH) for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. The cause for the inferior outcomes with MIRH is unclear. However, the use of a uterine manipulator and the lack of tumor containment strategies may contribute to tumor seeding in previous MIRH approaches.

Objective

Determine the feasibility and early oncologic outcomes of a novel robotic-assisted surgical technique for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer, Total Intracorporeal Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Vaginal Cerclage (TIRRHVC).

Methods

Retrospective cohort study.

Results

Twenty-six patients between 2018 and 2022 underwent the TIRRHVC procedure after being counseled on the risks and benefits of ORH and TIRRHVC; these 26 patients’ demographics, clinical, surgical, and oncologic outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Seventeen patients (65.4 %) had clinical stage IB1 and 9 (34.6 %) were IB2 cervical cancer according to FIGO 2018 guidelines. Following hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy, 4 patients were upstaged. The average pathologic tumor size was 2.66 cm (0 cm – 5.6 cm); 65 % of tumors were > 2 cm. There were no intraoperative complications. There were 13 postoperative complications, including 10 urinary tract infections. Eleven patients (42.3 %) received adjuvant therapy. The average follow-up period was 2.8 years (IQR 2.3–3.6). Only one patient has recurred at 3.6 years. One patient expired from causes unrelated to gynecologic cancer. The 3-year disease free survival is 95.5 %.

Conclusion

These promising early oncologic outcomes are encouraging that TIRRHVC may be a treatment option that offers the benefits of minimally invasive surgery without compromising oncologic outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外机器人根治性全子宫切除术(TIRRHVC)治疗临床 IB 期宫颈癌的可行性和早期肿瘤学结果:一种肿瘤遏制技术
导言:据报道,与开腹根治性子宫切除术(ORH)相比,微创根治性子宫切除术(MIRH)治疗早期宫颈癌的复发率增加了四倍。MIRH治疗效果较差的原因尚不清楚。目的确定治疗早期宫颈癌的新型机器人辅助手术技术--体外机器人根治性全子宫切除术(TIRRHVC)的可行性和早期肿瘤学结果。方法回顾性队列研究。结果2018年至2022年间,26名患者在接受了关于ORH和TIRRHVC风险和益处的咨询后接受了TIRRHVC手术;对这26名患者的人口统计学、临床、手术和肿瘤学结果进行了回顾性回顾。根据 FIGO 2018 指南,17 名患者(65.4%)为临床 IB1 期宫颈癌,9 名患者(34.6%)为 IB2 期宫颈癌。在子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术后,4 名患者进行了上分期。病理肿瘤平均大小为2.66厘米(0厘米-5.6厘米);65%的肿瘤为2厘米。术中无并发症。术后并发症有 13 例,包括 10 例尿路感染。11名患者(42.3%)接受了辅助治疗。平均随访时间为 2.8 年(IQR 2.3-3.6)。只有一名患者在 3.6 年后复发。一名患者因与妇科癌症无关的原因去世。3年无病生存率为95.5%。结论这些令人鼓舞的早期肿瘤学结果表明,TIRRHVC可能是一种治疗方案,既能提供微创手术的优势,又不会影响肿瘤学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
When ovarian mature teratoma peritonitis mimics cancer: What is the best treatment? High Rates of Germline Pathogenic Variants in Somali Patients with Ovarian Cancer Sleep characteristics and recurrence in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A feasibility study Rehabilitation of pelvic floor dysfunction after radiation therapy for a rare gynecological cancer: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1