The unseen burden: How ambidextrous leadership erodes managers' well-being

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-06-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114802
Jianfeng Jia , Weipeng Liu , Stephen X. Zhang , Wenhao Luo
{"title":"The unseen burden: How ambidextrous leadership erodes managers' well-being","authors":"Jianfeng Jia ,&nbsp;Weipeng Liu ,&nbsp;Stephen X. Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenhao Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The complex nature of B2B business environments requires ambidextrous leadership to resolve conflict, manage paradoxes, and foster beneficial employee outcomes. This study pivots from the conventional research focus on the benefits of ambidextrous leadership by investigating its potential toll on the managers themselves. Grounded in Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, we propose a chain-mediating model, shedding light on the pathways through which ambidextrous leadership can inadvertently lead to resource depletion in managers, reducing their own well-being. We further introduce Human Resource Management (HRM) system strength as a potential mitigating factor against these adverse impacts. Analyzing three-wave survey data from 304 B2B managers, our findings reveal that cognitive load and emotional exhaustion play chain-mediating roles between the relationship of ambidextrous leadership and managers’ well-being, while HRM system strength weakens these negative effects. This research offers insights on the darker side of ambidextrous leadership and managerial well-being in complex B2B environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324003060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complex nature of B2B business environments requires ambidextrous leadership to resolve conflict, manage paradoxes, and foster beneficial employee outcomes. This study pivots from the conventional research focus on the benefits of ambidextrous leadership by investigating its potential toll on the managers themselves. Grounded in Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, we propose a chain-mediating model, shedding light on the pathways through which ambidextrous leadership can inadvertently lead to resource depletion in managers, reducing their own well-being. We further introduce Human Resource Management (HRM) system strength as a potential mitigating factor against these adverse impacts. Analyzing three-wave survey data from 304 B2B managers, our findings reveal that cognitive load and emotional exhaustion play chain-mediating roles between the relationship of ambidextrous leadership and managers’ well-being, while HRM system strength weakens these negative effects. This research offers insights on the darker side of ambidextrous leadership and managerial well-being in complex B2B environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
看不见的负担双面领导如何侵蚀管理者的福祉
B2B 商业环境的复杂性要求双面领导力能够解决冲突、处理矛盾,并促进员工取得有益的成果。本研究将传统研究的重点从 "双面领导 "的益处转移到调查其对管理者自身的潜在影响上。我们以资源保护(COR)理论为基础,提出了一个链式中介模型,揭示了双向领导力可能无意中导致管理者资源枯竭、降低其自身福利的途径。我们进一步介绍了人力资源管理(HRM)系统的优势,将其作为减轻这些不利影响的潜在因素。通过对 304 名 B2B 经理的三波调查数据进行分析,我们的研究结果表明,认知负荷和情绪耗竭在 "双面领导 "与经理人的幸福感之间起着连锁中介作用,而人力资源管理体系的优势则会削弱这些负面影响。这项研究揭示了复杂的 B2B 环境中模态领导力和管理者幸福感的阴暗面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Crafting through financially demanding times: An entrepreneurial perspective Pay today, or delay the pay: Consumer preference for double flat-rate pricing plans Leveraging customer knowledge obtained through social media: The roles of R&D intensity and absorptive capacity Does the CEO effect differ in times of crisis? Evidence from US and China during the global financial crisis The shaping of marketplace moral sentiments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1