The effects of social capital and family income on farmers’ participation in rural public goods provision

IF 5.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Rural Studies Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103332
Furong Chen , Zhanli Sun , Yifu Zhao
{"title":"The effects of social capital and family income on farmers’ participation in rural public goods provision","authors":"Furong Chen ,&nbsp;Zhanli Sun ,&nbsp;Yifu Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Farmers' participation in rural public goods provision (PGP) is vital to improving rural public goods conditions and achieving rural revitalization in China. The factors influencing farmers' participation are, however, far from clear. This paper aims to investigate how social capital and income, the two most prominent factors, affect rural residents' participation in PGP. We use the Heckman sample selection model to empirically estimate the effects of both social capital and family income on farmers' participation and contribution to PGP based on a household survey conducted in four representative provinces in China. We further investigate the moderating effect of village location and elite ability on the effect of social capital on farmers' participation. Our results show that social capital generally has a positive impact on farmers' participation. Specifically, improving the formal norm, size of networks, and density of network would increase farmers' participation propensity. Enriching norms, particularly formal norms, can significantly improve farmers' contribution to public goods. Surprisingly, family income, mainly non-farm income, has a slightly negative effect on farmers' participation. Moreover, village-county distance can undermine the effect of social norms on farmers' participation, while elite ability can enhance the effect of social trust on farmers' participation. Thus, we suggest authorities should focus on enhancing social capital in the rural community to promote farmers’ participation in PGP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 103332"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724001360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farmers' participation in rural public goods provision (PGP) is vital to improving rural public goods conditions and achieving rural revitalization in China. The factors influencing farmers' participation are, however, far from clear. This paper aims to investigate how social capital and income, the two most prominent factors, affect rural residents' participation in PGP. We use the Heckman sample selection model to empirically estimate the effects of both social capital and family income on farmers' participation and contribution to PGP based on a household survey conducted in four representative provinces in China. We further investigate the moderating effect of village location and elite ability on the effect of social capital on farmers' participation. Our results show that social capital generally has a positive impact on farmers' participation. Specifically, improving the formal norm, size of networks, and density of network would increase farmers' participation propensity. Enriching norms, particularly formal norms, can significantly improve farmers' contribution to public goods. Surprisingly, family income, mainly non-farm income, has a slightly negative effect on farmers' participation. Moreover, village-county distance can undermine the effect of social norms on farmers' participation, while elite ability can enhance the effect of social trust on farmers' participation. Thus, we suggest authorities should focus on enhancing social capital in the rural community to promote farmers’ participation in PGP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会资本和家庭收入对农民参与农村公共产品供给的影响
在中国,农民参与农村公共产品供给(PGP)对于改善农村公共产品条件、实现乡村振兴至关重要。然而,影响农民参与的因素却并不明确。本文旨在研究社会资本和收入这两个最主要的因素是如何影响农村居民参与农村公共产品供给的。我们利用赫克曼样本选择模型,基于在中国四个有代表性的省份开展的住户调查,实证估计了社会资本和家庭收入对农民参与PGP及对PGP贡献的影响。我们进一步研究了村庄位置和精英能力对社会资本对农民参与影响的调节作用。结果表明,社会资本总体上对农民参与有积极影响。具体而言,改善正式规范、网络规模和网络密度会提高农民的参与倾向。丰富规范,尤其是正式规范,可以显著提高农民对公共产品的贡献。令人惊讶的是,家庭收入(主要是非农收入)对农民的参与有轻微的负面影响。此外,村县距离会削弱社会规范对农民参与的影响,而精英能力则会增强社会信任对农民参与的影响。因此,我们建议有关部门应注重增强农村社区的社会资本,以促进农民参与PGP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
期刊最新文献
Squeezing the Distance. Time-Spatial organization and negotiation of families’ everyday mobility in remote rural settings in the Swedish north Rural housewives clubs- unlocking the potential of Women's agency in local development in Poland Reviving rural “dead capital” through transferable development rights: A spatial justice analysis of online citizen–government interactions in China What makes residents prefer housing investment in a highly uncertain market? Perspectives from a survey in shrinking Finnish towns Assemblages of terror and the policing of settlement boundaries: Devolution and the production of order in northern Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1