Does waste management policy crowd out social and moral motives for recycling?

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1016/j.socec.2024.102233
Ida Ferrara , Paul Missios
{"title":"Does waste management policy crowd out social and moral motives for recycling?","authors":"Ida Ferrara ,&nbsp;Paul Missios","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social and moral motivations can influence households’ decisions regarding pro-environmental behavior, such as recycling. In a theoretical framework that allows for these motivations, we analyze how policies such as unit pricing and mandatory recycling affect whether and, in the presence of heterogeneous households, the extent to which a society recycles. We show that unit pricing enhances the effect of intrinsic motivation while mandatory recycling can erode it (depending on the marginal utility of self-image and the recycling cost-to-benefit ratio). We empirically investigate the relationship between policy and intrinsic motivation, using different cutoffs for recyclers and non-recyclers, and find support for our theoretical predictions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000715","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social and moral motivations can influence households’ decisions regarding pro-environmental behavior, such as recycling. In a theoretical framework that allows for these motivations, we analyze how policies such as unit pricing and mandatory recycling affect whether and, in the presence of heterogeneous households, the extent to which a society recycles. We show that unit pricing enhances the effect of intrinsic motivation while mandatory recycling can erode it (depending on the marginal utility of self-image and the recycling cost-to-benefit ratio). We empirically investigate the relationship between policy and intrinsic motivation, using different cutoffs for recyclers and non-recyclers, and find support for our theoretical predictions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
废物管理政策是否会挤掉回收利用的社会和道德动机?
社会和道德动机会影响家庭对回收利用等环保行为的决策。在考虑到这些动机的理论框架下,我们分析了单位定价和强制回收等政策如何影响家庭是否回收,以及在存在异质性家庭的情况下,社会回收的程度。我们的研究表明,单位定价会增强内在动机的效果,而强制回收则会削弱内在动机(取决于自我形象的边际效用和回收成本收益比)。我们使用回收者和非回收者的不同分界线,对政策与内在动机之间的关系进行了实证研究,结果支持了我们的理论预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
期刊最新文献
Privacy during pandemics: Attitudes to public use of personal data Understanding inconsistencies in risk attitude elicitation games: Evidence from smallholder farmers in five African countries Inflation expectations in the wake of the war in Ukraine Asking for a friend: Reminders and incentives for crowdfunding college savings ‘Update Bias’: Manipulating past information based on the existing circumstances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1