Synergy of pollution reduction and carbon abatement of the 8 urban agglomerations in China: Status, dynamic evolution, and Spatial-temporal characteristics

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105180
Tiantian Yang , Lan Yi , Shuai Yan , Rui Zhang , Xiyu Wang
{"title":"Synergy of pollution reduction and carbon abatement of the 8 urban agglomerations in China: Status, dynamic evolution, and Spatial-temporal characteristics","authors":"Tiantian Yang ,&nbsp;Lan Yi ,&nbsp;Shuai Yan ,&nbsp;Rui Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiyu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As the manifestations of spatial connection and the key units for implementing green development strategies, the 8 typical urban agglomerations of China cover 68.9% and 60.1% of the nationwide GDP and energy consumption respectively, and the carbon and pollution emissions exceed half of the national level, showcasing the significant potential in achieving synergy of pollution reduction and carbon abatement. Based on the idea of “source prevention, process control, and endpoint governance” given by the Chinese government, the study analyzes synergy accordingly from the perspectives of measures synergy, path synergy, and effects synergy, employs the composite system synergy model to evaluate the synergy of the 8 urban agglomerations in China at the prefecture-level during 2010–2020, and analyzes their dynamic evolution and spatio-temporal characteristics. The findings indicate that: (1) Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta urban agglomerations have achieved synergy, while the synergy degree of the two systems in Central Plain, Fenwei Plain and Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration is negative in 2020; (2) Moran's I indicates the urban agglomerations lack awareness of joint prevention and control between cities within the urban agglomerations. The kernel density estimation reveals that the overall path and effects synergy system has made significant progress in the last decade, while the measures synergy shows a downward trend; (3) Within each urban agglomeration, the main strengths of high-order cities lie in their transportation structure and resources utilization subsystems, while the main weaknesses of low-order cities can be attributed to their carbon abatement and energy structure subsystems. This study further provides policy implications for the urban agglomerations and cities inside to facilitate the synergy of pollution reduction and carbon abatement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724005476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the manifestations of spatial connection and the key units for implementing green development strategies, the 8 typical urban agglomerations of China cover 68.9% and 60.1% of the nationwide GDP and energy consumption respectively, and the carbon and pollution emissions exceed half of the national level, showcasing the significant potential in achieving synergy of pollution reduction and carbon abatement. Based on the idea of “source prevention, process control, and endpoint governance” given by the Chinese government, the study analyzes synergy accordingly from the perspectives of measures synergy, path synergy, and effects synergy, employs the composite system synergy model to evaluate the synergy of the 8 urban agglomerations in China at the prefecture-level during 2010–2020, and analyzes their dynamic evolution and spatio-temporal characteristics. The findings indicate that: (1) Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta urban agglomerations have achieved synergy, while the synergy degree of the two systems in Central Plain, Fenwei Plain and Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration is negative in 2020; (2) Moran's I indicates the urban agglomerations lack awareness of joint prevention and control between cities within the urban agglomerations. The kernel density estimation reveals that the overall path and effects synergy system has made significant progress in the last decade, while the measures synergy shows a downward trend; (3) Within each urban agglomeration, the main strengths of high-order cities lie in their transportation structure and resources utilization subsystems, while the main weaknesses of low-order cities can be attributed to their carbon abatement and energy structure subsystems. This study further provides policy implications for the urban agglomerations and cities inside to facilitate the synergy of pollution reduction and carbon abatement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国 8 个城市群的污染减排与碳减排协同作用:现状、动态演变与时空特征
作为空间关联的表现形式和实施绿色发展战略的关键单元,中国 8 个典型城市群的 GDP 和能耗分别占全国的 68.9%和 60.1%,碳排放和污染排放超过全国水平的一半,在实现污染减排和碳减排协同方面潜力巨大。本研究根据中国政府提出的 "源头预防、过程控制、末端治理 "的思路,从措施协同、路径协同和效果协同三个方面对协同进行了分析,运用复合系统协同模型对中国 8 个城市群 2010-2020 年地级市的协同进行了评价,并分析了其动态演化和时空特征。研究结果表明(1)长三角和珠三角城市群实现了协同,而中原城市群、汾渭平原城市群和成渝城市群在 2020 年两个系统的协同程度为负;(2)莫兰 I 表明城市群内部城市间缺乏联防联控意识。核密度估计表明,近十年来,总体路径协同和效应协同系统取得了显著进步,而措施协同则呈下降趋势;(3)在各城市群内部,高阶城市的主要优势在于其交通结构和资源利用子系统,而低阶城市的主要劣势可归结为其碳减排和能源结构子系统。本研究进一步为城市群及其内部城市提供了政策启示,以促进污染减排和碳减排的协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty and entrepreneurship in oil-rich developing countries: Does institution matter? Impact of natural resource rents on global trade dynamics in RCEP: Economic and geopolitical interdependencies Asymmetric relationship between crude oil price and remittance inflows in a small island economy: Evidence from non-linear ARDL approach Institutions as a determinant of FDI and the role of natural resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1