US adults accurately assess Hadza and Tsimane men's hunting ability from a single face photograph

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Evolution and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.106598
Adar B. Eisenbruch , Kristopher M. Smith , Clifford I. Workman , Christopher von Rueden , Coren L. Apicella
{"title":"US adults accurately assess Hadza and Tsimane men's hunting ability from a single face photograph","authors":"Adar B. Eisenbruch ,&nbsp;Kristopher M. Smith ,&nbsp;Clifford I. Workman ,&nbsp;Christopher von Rueden ,&nbsp;Coren L. Apicella","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.106598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Trait inferences from faces are pervasive, but sometimes misleading. Past research indicates Americans infer hunting and gathering ability from others' faces, but the accuracy of these perceptions remains unknown. In three studies, we test whether Americans can accurately perceive foraging ability from faces. We used three datasets from two traditional subsistence societies (the Hadza and the Tsimane) in which individuals were photographed and evaluated by their peers on their ability to hunt or gather effectively (<em>N</em> = 175). US MTurkers (<em>N</em> = 579) then evaluated the photos for foraging ability. We found that MTurkers' perceptions of men consistently tracked peer-evaluated hunting ability (overall <em>r</em> = 0.25), suggesting that naïve perceptions of men's productivity from a face photo alone reflect actual hunting ability. MTurkers' perceptions of women's productivity inversely correlated with their peer-evaluated gathering ability, however. We discuss potential mechanisms and implications for research on social perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000746","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trait inferences from faces are pervasive, but sometimes misleading. Past research indicates Americans infer hunting and gathering ability from others' faces, but the accuracy of these perceptions remains unknown. In three studies, we test whether Americans can accurately perceive foraging ability from faces. We used three datasets from two traditional subsistence societies (the Hadza and the Tsimane) in which individuals were photographed and evaluated by their peers on their ability to hunt or gather effectively (N = 175). US MTurkers (N = 579) then evaluated the photos for foraging ability. We found that MTurkers' perceptions of men consistently tracked peer-evaluated hunting ability (overall r = 0.25), suggesting that naïve perceptions of men's productivity from a face photo alone reflect actual hunting ability. MTurkers' perceptions of women's productivity inversely correlated with their peer-evaluated gathering ability, however. We discuss potential mechanisms and implications for research on social perception.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国成年人通过一张脸部照片准确评估哈扎人和齐马内人的狩猎能力
从面孔推断特质是一种普遍现象,但有时会产生误导。过去的研究表明,美国人可以从他人的面孔中推断出狩猎和采集能力,但这些推断的准确性仍然不得而知。在三项研究中,我们测试了美国人是否能从面孔中准确感知觅食能力。我们使用了来自两个传统自给自足社会(哈德扎人和齐马内人)的三个数据集,在这三个数据集中,个体被拍照并由同伴评价其有效狩猎或采集的能力(N = 175)。然后,美国 MTurkers(N = 579)对这些照片的觅食能力进行评估。我们发现, MTurkers 对男性的感知始终与同伴评价的狩猎能力相一致(总体 r = 0.25),这表明仅从脸部照片对男性生产力的天真感知反映了实际的狩猎能力。然而,MTurkers 对女性生产力的看法与其同伴评价的采集能力成反比。我们讨论了社会认知研究的潜在机制和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
期刊最新文献
Even small differences in attractiveness and formidability affect the probability and speed of selection: An online study and an offline replication Deep neural networks generate facial metrics that overcome limitations of previous methods and predict in-person attraction Sex differences in close friendships and social style Perceptions of facial trustworthiness and dominance modulate early neural responses to male facial sexual dimorphism Men (but not women) prefer to live in economically equal societies when it comes to mating: A five-study investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1