Factors influencing farmers' preference for farmland consolidation in Nepal: Evidence from randomized conjoint experiment

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104038
Roshan Pun , Niraj Prakash Joshi , Sirish Pun
{"title":"Factors influencing farmers' preference for farmland consolidation in Nepal: Evidence from randomized conjoint experiment","authors":"Roshan Pun ,&nbsp;Niraj Prakash Joshi ,&nbsp;Sirish Pun","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Increasing fragmentation of farmland remains a critical agriculture development challenge around the world, specifically in developing countries. Farmland consolidation is one of the most efficient policy instruments, extensively implemented across the world, to deal with the critical issues in agriculture sector associated with farmland fragmentation. Despite this prospect there is a vast gap in literature exploring factors influencing farmers' preference for farmland consolidation in developing countries like Nepal.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>This research aims to identify the factors influencing farmers' preference for farmland consolidation through a randomized conjoint experiment.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>For a randomized conjoint experiment, five attributes related to farmland consolidation, i.e., methods of consolidation, development of roads and irrigation, the expected increase in agricultural income, minimum area of farmland for consolidation, and provision of service, with 3–4 levels were identified through literature review, expert consultation, and pretesting. The average marginal component effects of each randomly assigned attribute's levels are estimated. Respondents' willingness to accept farmland consolidation is also assessed based on the choice led by the expected increase in agricultural income.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Sixty-five percent of respondent farmers preferred the alternative policy to consolidate farmland over the status quo. The expected increase in income and the development of roads and irrigation through a joint effort of the government and farmers influence farmers' preference for farmland consolidation positively. In contrast, farmers' preference for farmland consolidation is negatively affected by a bigger area of farmland consolidation. The method of farmland consolidation and provision of service does not have a significant impact on farmers' preference for farmland consolidation. Respondent farmers are willing to accept a yearly increase of USD 362 per hectare to consolidate their farmland.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>This paper suggests any policy targeted for farmland consolidation to focus on ensuring the increased income for the participant farmers mainly through shared effort to develop a connection road and irrigation infrastructure contributing to efficient production practices in the consolidated farmland. The farmers would consolidate their land if their yearly farm income increased by USD 362. Since majority of Nepali farmers are smallholding farmers, they would not prefer the larger size for farmland consolidation as it involves many farmers or require high capital to procure land through buying/selling of land. These policy implications could be extended to other developing countries which are experiencing increasing farmland fragmentation and having the similar socioeconomic context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24001884","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Increasing fragmentation of farmland remains a critical agriculture development challenge around the world, specifically in developing countries. Farmland consolidation is one of the most efficient policy instruments, extensively implemented across the world, to deal with the critical issues in agriculture sector associated with farmland fragmentation. Despite this prospect there is a vast gap in literature exploring factors influencing farmers' preference for farmland consolidation in developing countries like Nepal.

OBJECTIVE

This research aims to identify the factors influencing farmers' preference for farmland consolidation through a randomized conjoint experiment.

METHODS

For a randomized conjoint experiment, five attributes related to farmland consolidation, i.e., methods of consolidation, development of roads and irrigation, the expected increase in agricultural income, minimum area of farmland for consolidation, and provision of service, with 3–4 levels were identified through literature review, expert consultation, and pretesting. The average marginal component effects of each randomly assigned attribute's levels are estimated. Respondents' willingness to accept farmland consolidation is also assessed based on the choice led by the expected increase in agricultural income.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Sixty-five percent of respondent farmers preferred the alternative policy to consolidate farmland over the status quo. The expected increase in income and the development of roads and irrigation through a joint effort of the government and farmers influence farmers' preference for farmland consolidation positively. In contrast, farmers' preference for farmland consolidation is negatively affected by a bigger area of farmland consolidation. The method of farmland consolidation and provision of service does not have a significant impact on farmers' preference for farmland consolidation. Respondent farmers are willing to accept a yearly increase of USD 362 per hectare to consolidate their farmland.

SIGNIFICANCE

This paper suggests any policy targeted for farmland consolidation to focus on ensuring the increased income for the participant farmers mainly through shared effort to develop a connection road and irrigation infrastructure contributing to efficient production practices in the consolidated farmland. The farmers would consolidate their land if their yearly farm income increased by USD 362. Since majority of Nepali farmers are smallholding farmers, they would not prefer the larger size for farmland consolidation as it involves many farmers or require high capital to procure land through buying/selling of land. These policy implications could be extended to other developing countries which are experiencing increasing farmland fragmentation and having the similar socioeconomic context.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响尼泊尔农民对农田整合偏好的因素:来自随机联合实验的证据
内容提要 农田碎片化的加剧仍然是世界各地,特别是发展中国家农业发展面临的一个严峻挑战。农田整合是最有效的政策工具之一,在世界各地广泛实施,以解决农业部门与农田碎片化相关的关键问题。尽管前景广阔,但在探索影响尼泊尔等发展中国家农民对农田合并的偏好的因素方面,仍存在巨大的文献空白、通过文献查阅、专家咨询和预试验,确定了与农田整理相关的五个属性,即整理方法、道路和灌溉的发展、农业收入的预期增长、农田整理的最小面积和服务的提供,共 3-4 个等级。对每个随机分配属性水平的平均边际分量效应进行了估算。结果与结论与现状相比,65% 的受访农民更愿意选择耕地合并替代政策。通过政府和农民的共同努力,预期的收入增长以及道路和灌溉的发展对农民的耕地合并偏好产生了积极影响。相反,耕地合并面积越大,农民对耕地合并的偏好越低。耕地整理的方式和提供的服务对农民的耕地整理偏好没有显著影响。本文建议,任何针对农田整合的政策都应将重点放在确保参与农户的收入增加上,主要是通 过共同努力发展连接道路和灌溉基础设施,促进整合后农田的高效生产实践。如果农民每年的农业收入增加 362 美元,他们就会合并土地。由于尼泊尔的大多数农民都是小农户,他们不会选择较大面积的农田合并,因为这涉及到许多农民,或者需要高额资金通过购买/出售土地来获得土地。这些政策影响可推广到其他发展中国家,因为这些国家的耕地日益分散,社会经济背景也类似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Improving livelihood through crop-livestock integration: Insights from a farm trajectory model Climate and biodiversity impact of beef and lamb production – A case study in Sweden Water quality impacts of recycling nutrients using organic fertilizers in circular agricultural scenarios Integrating sustainability assessment tools with life cycle analysis for agroecological systems: A UK case study Irrigation expansion shows potential for increased maize yield and reduced nitrogen leaching in the Midwest US
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1