Combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in gastric cancer patients: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111543
Huolin Zeng MD , Feng Yin MD , Lingling Fan MM , Chengyu Li MPH , Hongyan Lin MM , Fei Liu MD , Qian Li MD
{"title":"Combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in gastric cancer patients: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial","authors":"Huolin Zeng MD ,&nbsp;Feng Yin MD ,&nbsp;Lingling Fan MM ,&nbsp;Chengyu Li MPH ,&nbsp;Hongyan Lin MM ,&nbsp;Fei Liu MD ,&nbsp;Qian Li MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>We conducted this double-blinded randomized controlled trial to examine whether the combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block could improve analgesia efficacy and duration for gastric cancer patients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>The preoperative area, operating room, postanesthesia recovery room and bed ward.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>A total of 312 adult patients (104 per group) with gastric cancer were included.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients received bilateral subcostal TAP block with three different anesthetics (60 ml 0.25% ropivacaine added with 10 mg dexamethasone and 1 μg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [A] or 10 mg dexamethasone [B] or 1 μg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [C]).</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain 24 h on movement. Secondary outcomes included incidence of moderate-to-severe pain, pain score, opioids use, recovery quality and adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on movement 24 h postoperatively of group A was significantly lower than group B (45.19% vs 63.46%; RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.92) and group C (45.19% vs 73.08%, RR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79). The median moving pain scores decreased significantly at 24 h (3.00 [3.00,5.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,6.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,5.00]; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). There were significant differences in the opioids consumption within the first 24 h (27.5 [17.0,37.2] vs 30.0 [20.0,42.0] vs 32.0 [25.0,44.0] mg; <em>P</em> = 0.01) and the duration to first rescue analgesia (65.5 ± 26.7 vs 45.9 ± 34.5 vs 49.2 ± 27.2 h; <em>P</em> = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combination with dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants for TAP block reduced the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and pain score both on movement and at rest at 24 h with prolonged duration to first rescue analgesia after gastric cancer surgery.</p><p><strong><em>Trial registration number:</em></strong> ChiCTR2000037981.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024001727","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective

We conducted this double-blinded randomized controlled trial to examine whether the combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block could improve analgesia efficacy and duration for gastric cancer patients.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

The preoperative area, operating room, postanesthesia recovery room and bed ward.

Patients

A total of 312 adult patients (104 per group) with gastric cancer were included.

Interventions

Patients received bilateral subcostal TAP block with three different anesthetics (60 ml 0.25% ropivacaine added with 10 mg dexamethasone and 1 μg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [A] or 10 mg dexamethasone [B] or 1 μg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [C]).

Measurements

The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain 24 h on movement. Secondary outcomes included incidence of moderate-to-severe pain, pain score, opioids use, recovery quality and adverse events.

Main results

The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on movement 24 h postoperatively of group A was significantly lower than group B (45.19% vs 63.46%; RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.92) and group C (45.19% vs 73.08%, RR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79). The median moving pain scores decreased significantly at 24 h (3.00 [3.00,5.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,6.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,5.00]; P < 0.001). There were significant differences in the opioids consumption within the first 24 h (27.5 [17.0,37.2] vs 30.0 [20.0,42.0] vs 32.0 [25.0,44.0] mg; P = 0.01) and the duration to first rescue analgesia (65.5 ± 26.7 vs 45.9 ± 34.5 vs 49.2 ± 27.2 h; P = 0.04).

Conclusions

The combination with dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants for TAP block reduced the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and pain score both on movement and at rest at 24 h with prolonged duration to first rescue analgesia after gastric cancer surgery.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000037981.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地塞米松和右美托咪定联合作为腹横肌平面阻滞的辅助药物用于胃癌患者的术后镇痛:双盲随机对照试验
研究目的我们进行了这项双盲随机对照试验,以探讨地塞米松和右美托咪定联合作为腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞的辅助用药是否能提高胃癌患者的镇痛效果并延长镇痛时间。干预措施患者接受双侧肋下 TAP 阻滞,使用三种不同的麻醉剂(60 毫升 0.测量主要结果是活动 24 小时后中度至重度疼痛的发生率。主要结果A组术后24小时活动时中度至重度疼痛的发生率明显低于B组(45.19% vs 63.46%;RR 0.71;95% CI,0.55~0.92)和C组(45.19% vs 73.08%,RR 0.62;95% CI,0.49~0.79)。24 小时后,移动疼痛评分的中位数明显下降(3.00 [3.00,5.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,6.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,5.00]; P <0.001)。头 24 小时内阿片类药物的消耗量(27.5 [17.0,37.2] vs 30.0 [20.0,42.0] vs 32.0 [25.0,44.0] mg;P = 0.01)和首次抢救镇痛的持续时间(65.5 ± 26.7 vs 45.9 ± 34.5 vs 49.2 ± 27.2 h;P = 0.04)存在明显差异。结论联合使用地塞米松和右美托咪定作为TAP阻滞的辅助药物可降低胃癌术后24小时内中度至重度疼痛的发生率以及运动和静息时的疼痛评分,并延长首次抢救性镇痛的持续时间:ChiCTR2000037981。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Benefit of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine on cognitive function following noncardiac surgery: An updated meta-analysis. Esketamine in postoperative recovery: Reliable for negative emotional relief, ambiguous for cognitive function. National trends in perioperative epidural analgesia use for surgical patients Response to comment on: “Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial” Letter to the editor regarding “Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1