Background: Cervical interlaminar epidural injection (CIEI) is a commonly performed neuraxial intervention in anesthetic and pain management practice for the treatment of neck and radicular pain. Accurate identification of the epidural space is essential to avoid serious complications. Although fluoroscopy is considered the reference standard for confirming epidural placement, epidural access in anesthetic practice is typically achieved using the loss-of-resistance technique. Preprocedural estimation of epidural depth using ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may enhance procedural control and optimize fluoroscopic use.
Methods: This prospective observational study, included 90 patients undergoing CIEI at the C7-T1 level. Epidural depth was estimated preprocedurally using ultrasonography (US-PED) and cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-PED) and compared with contrast-confirmed epidural depth under fluoroscopic guidance (CCED). Accuracy was defined as measurements within ±0.3 cm of the CCED. Associations and agreement between measurement methods were assessed using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. In addition, relationships between CCED, patient demographic characteristics, and the number of lateral fluoroscopic images (NLFI) were analyzed.
Results: The CCED was measured at 6.01 ± 0.84 cm. Mean ultrasonography-predicted (US-PED) and MRI-predicted epidural depths (MRI-PED) were 5.92 ± 0.77 cm and 5.93 ± 0.97 cm, respectively. Within an error margin of ±0.3 cm, 60.0% of US-PED and 67.8% of MRI-PED measurements accurately predicted the CCED. The two methods demonstrated strong positive correlations with CCED (US-PED: r = 0.80; MRI-PED: r = 0.94; p < 0.001 for both), with narrower limits of agreement for MRI on Bland-Altman analysis. CCED showed a moderate positive correlation with the number of lateral fluoroscopic images (NLFI) (r = 0.46; p < 0.001), while no significant associations were observed with age, gender, or body mass index.
Conclusion: Epidural depth in CIEIs can be predicted with clinically meaningful accuracy using both MRI and ultrasonography, with MRI demonstrating superior accuracy. Although these modalities do not replace fluoroscopy, preprocedural depth estimation may enhance procedural safety and improve planning of lateral fluoroscopic imaging as reflected by the NLFI. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in broader patient populations.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
