首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia最新文献

英文 中文
"Further studies are needed": Scientific convention or editorial evasion? A critical appraisal of an overused phrase in medical publishing. “需要进一步研究”:科学惯例还是编辑回避?对医学出版中一个被滥用的短语的批判性评价。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112141
Zeynep Kayhan, Elvin Kesimci
{"title":"\"Further studies are needed\": Scientific convention or editorial evasion? A critical appraisal of an overused phrase in medical publishing.","authors":"Zeynep Kayhan, Elvin Kesimci","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112141","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"112141"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short- and immediate-term outcomes after sugammadex versus neostigmine in patients with severe chronic kidney disease: A retrospective cohort study. 重度慢性肾病患者使用糖马德与新斯的明治疗后的短期和近期结果:一项回顾性队列研究
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112146
Kuo-Chuan Hung, Li-Chen Chang, Ping-Heng Tan, Chih-Wei Hsu, Yi-Chen Lai, Jheng-Yan Wu, I-Wen Chen

Objective: To evaluate the association between sugammadex use and postoperative complications in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) having elective gastrointestinal surgery.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching.

Setting: The TriNetX Research Network, a multi-institutional database primarily comprising U.S. healthcare organizations, with data from 2016 to 2024, reflecting the post-FDA-approved use of sugammadex.

Interventions: Patients received either sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium-based neuromuscular block.

Patients: Adult patients with severe CKD who had gastrointestinal surgery. Of the 13,693 patients receiving sugammadex and 5714 receiving neostigmine, one-to-one propensity score matching yielded 5690 patients in each group for analysis.

Measurements: The primary outcome was composite pulmonary complications (CPCs) within 30 days, whereas secondary outcomes included acute respiratory failure (ARF), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). All outcomes were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnostic codes and assessed at the 7-, 30-, and 90-day follow-up intervals.

Results: At the 30-day follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the groups for CPCs (2.1% vs. 2.1%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.29, p = 0.983), ARF (1.8% vs. 1.8%; HR:1.00, 95% CI 0.76-1.32, p = 0.984), or MACEs (3.1% vs. 3.1%; HR:0.98, 95%CI 0.80-1.21, p = 0.849). ICU admission was numerically higher in the sugammadex group (4.9% vs. 4.0%; HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.47, p = 0.019), but did not reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (adjusted significance threshold of p < 0.01). At the 7-day and 90-day follow-ups, no outcome reached statistical significance after Bonferroni correction at either time point.

Conclusions: Sugammadex was not associated with a significantly increased risk of pulmonary, cardiovascular, or mortality outcomes compared with neostigmine in patients with severe CKD having elective gastrointestinal surgery. Given the potential residual confounding by unmeasured factors such as surgical complexity, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

目的:评价选择性胃肠手术的严重慢性肾病(CKD)患者使用糖麦德与术后并发症的关系。设计:采用倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究。背景:TriNetX研究网络,一个主要由美国医疗机构组成的多机构数据库,数据从2016年到2024年,反映了fda批准使用sugammadex后的情况。干预措施:患者接受糖马德或新斯的明治疗以逆转罗库溴铵为基础的神经肌肉阻滞。患者:严重CKD的成年患者进行胃肠手术。在13693例接受sugammadex治疗的患者和5714例接受新斯的明治疗的患者中,一对一倾向评分匹配得到每组5690例患者进行分析。测量:主要终点是30天内的复合肺部并发症(CPCs),而次要终点包括急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)、重症监护病房(ICU)入院、全因死亡率和主要不良心血管事件(mace)。使用国际疾病分类第十版临床修改(ICD-10-CM)诊断代码确定所有结果,并在7天、30天和90天随访间隔进行评估。结果:在30天的随访中,各组之间的CPCs (2.1% vs. 2.1%;风险比[HR]: 1.00, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.78-1.29, p = 0.983)、ARF (1.8% vs. 1.8%; HR:1.00, 95%CI: 0.76-1.32, p = 0.984)或mace (3.1% vs. 3.1%; HR:0.98, 95%CI 0.80-1.21, p = 0.849)均无显著差异。sugammadex组的ICU入院率更高(4.9% vs. 4.0%; HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.47, p = 0.019),但经Bonferroni校正后没有达到统计学意义(p校正显著性阈值为p)。结论:与新斯的明相比,选择性胃肠手术的严重CKD患者,sugammadex与肺、心血管或死亡结局风险的显著增加无关。考虑到手术复杂性等未测量因素的潜在残留混淆,需要随机对照试验来证实这些发现。
{"title":"Short- and immediate-term outcomes after sugammadex versus neostigmine in patients with severe chronic kidney disease: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Kuo-Chuan Hung, Li-Chen Chang, Ping-Heng Tan, Chih-Wei Hsu, Yi-Chen Lai, Jheng-Yan Wu, I-Wen Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between sugammadex use and postoperative complications in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) having elective gastrointestinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The TriNetX Research Network, a multi-institutional database primarily comprising U.S. healthcare organizations, with data from 2016 to 2024, reflecting the post-FDA-approved use of sugammadex.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients received either sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium-based neuromuscular block.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with severe CKD who had gastrointestinal surgery. Of the 13,693 patients receiving sugammadex and 5714 receiving neostigmine, one-to-one propensity score matching yielded 5690 patients in each group for analysis.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was composite pulmonary complications (CPCs) within 30 days, whereas secondary outcomes included acute respiratory failure (ARF), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). All outcomes were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnostic codes and assessed at the 7-, 30-, and 90-day follow-up intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 30-day follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the groups for CPCs (2.1% vs. 2.1%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.29, p = 0.983), ARF (1.8% vs. 1.8%; HR:1.00, 95% CI 0.76-1.32, p = 0.984), or MACEs (3.1% vs. 3.1%; HR:0.98, 95%CI 0.80-1.21, p = 0.849). ICU admission was numerically higher in the sugammadex group (4.9% vs. 4.0%; HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.47, p = 0.019), but did not reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (adjusted significance threshold of p < 0.01). At the 7-day and 90-day follow-ups, no outcome reached statistical significance after Bonferroni correction at either time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sugammadex was not associated with a significantly increased risk of pulmonary, cardiovascular, or mortality outcomes compared with neostigmine in patients with severe CKD having elective gastrointestinal surgery. Given the potential residual confounding by unmeasured factors such as surgical complexity, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"110 ","pages":"112146"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From fast track to enhanced recovery after Cardiac surgery: 15 years of experience with the Leipzig concept in a specialized post-anesthesia care unit. 从快速通道到心脏手术后的增强恢复:15年莱比锡概念在专业麻醉后护理单位的经验。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112137
Waseem Zakhary, Anna Flo Forner, David Holzhey, Michael A Borger, Wolfgang Otto, Massimiliano Meineri, Joerg Karl Ender

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) has become the standard of care for selected patients. This study evaluated the evolution of the Leipzig concept in a specialized postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) over 15 years, with a focus on temporal trends and clinical outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients admitted to PACU after cardiac surgery at the Heart Center Leipzig between November 2005 and December 2020. Postoperative outcomes, including postprocedural complications, hospital length of stay, delirium, and mortality, were recorded. The outcomes were analyzed via multivariable models, and the adjusted results are reported.

Results: Among 56,371 cardiac surgery patients, 42% (n = 23,724) were admitted to the PACU and managed according to the ERACS protocol. After excluding incomplete datasets, 20,773 patients were analyzed. Utilization increased from 19% in 2006 to 60% in 2020. Despite a rising proportion of moderate- and high-complexity surgeries, in-hospital mortality has remained stable. Improved adherence to the ERACS components, including the integration of a delirium prevention bundle, was associated with significant reductions in postoperative delirium (p = 0.02) and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.007). Patients treated with sufentanil exhibited significantly lower in-hospital mortality than did those receiving remifentanil (p = 0.005). Subgroup analyses revealed higher in-hospital mortality in patients with EuroSCORE II ≥6%, complex procedures, and age ≥ 75 years (p < 0.001, p = 0.04, and p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions: This study presents the largest collection of consecutive ERACS patients ever collected and demonstrates the safety and efficacy of ERACS management with a specialized PACU, highlighting the benefits of continuous protocol optimization.

背景:心脏手术后增强康复(ERACS)已成为特定患者的标准护理。本研究评估了15年来莱比锡概念在专业麻醉后护理单位(PACU)的演变,重点关注时间趋势和临床结果。方法:对2005年11月至2020年12月莱比锡心脏中心心脏手术后入住PACU的患者进行回顾性队列研究。记录术后结果,包括术后并发症、住院时间、谵妄和死亡率。通过多变量模型对结果进行分析,并报告调整后的结果。结果:在56,371例心脏手术患者中,42% (n = 23,724)入住PACU并根据ERACS方案进行管理。在排除不完整的数据集后,分析了20,773例患者。利用率从2006年的19%增加到2020年的60%。尽管中等和高度复杂手术的比例不断上升,但住院死亡率保持稳定。改善对ERACS组件的依从性,包括谵妄预防包的整合,与术后谵妄(p = 0.02)和住院死亡率(p = 0.007)的显著降低相关。接受舒芬太尼治疗的患者的住院死亡率明显低于接受瑞芬太尼治疗的患者(p = 0.005)。亚组分析显示,EuroSCORE II≥6%、手术复杂、年龄≥75岁的患者住院死亡率较高(p)。结论:本研究收集了迄今为止最多的连续ERACS患者,并证明了使用专门PACU进行ERACS管理的安全性和有效性,突出了持续方案优化的益处。
{"title":"From fast track to enhanced recovery after Cardiac surgery: 15 years of experience with the Leipzig concept in a specialized post-anesthesia care unit.","authors":"Waseem Zakhary, Anna Flo Forner, David Holzhey, Michael A Borger, Wolfgang Otto, Massimiliano Meineri, Joerg Karl Ender","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) has become the standard of care for selected patients. This study evaluated the evolution of the Leipzig concept in a specialized postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) over 15 years, with a focus on temporal trends and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients admitted to PACU after cardiac surgery at the Heart Center Leipzig between November 2005 and December 2020. Postoperative outcomes, including postprocedural complications, hospital length of stay, delirium, and mortality, were recorded. The outcomes were analyzed via multivariable models, and the adjusted results are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 56,371 cardiac surgery patients, 42% (n = 23,724) were admitted to the PACU and managed according to the ERACS protocol. After excluding incomplete datasets, 20,773 patients were analyzed. Utilization increased from 19% in 2006 to 60% in 2020. Despite a rising proportion of moderate- and high-complexity surgeries, in-hospital mortality has remained stable. Improved adherence to the ERACS components, including the integration of a delirium prevention bundle, was associated with significant reductions in postoperative delirium (p = 0.02) and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.007). Patients treated with sufentanil exhibited significantly lower in-hospital mortality than did those receiving remifentanil (p = 0.005). Subgroup analyses revealed higher in-hospital mortality in patients with EuroSCORE II ≥6%, complex procedures, and age ≥ 75 years (p < 0.001, p = 0.04, and p < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study presents the largest collection of consecutive ERACS patients ever collected and demonstrates the safety and efficacy of ERACS management with a specialized PACU, highlighting the benefits of continuous protocol optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"110 ","pages":"112137"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Culture under pressure: Barriers, burnout, and leadership in perioperative care. 压力下的文化:围手术期护理的障碍、倦怠和领导力。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112143
Michael R Ebbert
{"title":"Culture under pressure: Barriers, burnout, and leadership in perioperative care.","authors":"Michael R Ebbert","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112143","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"110 ","pages":"112143"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond technical mastery: The inner work of leadership in medicine. 超越技术精通:医学领导的内在工作。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112142
T Baima, M M Luedi, C S Romero
{"title":"Beyond technical mastery: The inner work of leadership in medicine.","authors":"T Baima, M M Luedi, C S Romero","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112142","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"110 ","pages":"112142"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146105597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Queue management for the assignment of anesthesia clinician breaks to increase fractions completed before the end of surgical closure and during planned time windows 分配麻醉临床医生休息的队列管理,以增加手术结束前和计划时间窗内完成的分数
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112136
Franklin Dexter , Sarah S. Titler , Richard H. Epstein

Background

At surgical suites with long workdays, anesthesia clinicians typically receive lunch breaks. We estimated the percentage relative impact of decision-making processes on 30-min breaks completed during cases' surgical periods and during two-hour windows (e.g., 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM).

Methods

Discrete-event simulations of breaks were performed using a retrospective cohort of a large teaching hospital's 15 years of actual dates (N = 5481 days), operating rooms (N = 53) in three surgical suites, surgical times (N = 460,354), and scheduled procedures (N = 30,212).

Results

Giving breaks preferentially to rooms with cases that had the least predicted time left until the end of surgery, provided the end of surgery was expected to be late enough to finish after the break, resulted in 16.5% fewer breaks versus giving preference to longest ongoing cases (P < 0.0001). Pooled lists (i.e., using a single queue) with preferences for the longest ongoing cases resulted in overall 7.2% more complete breaks, with these substantive increases achieved for all three suites (all four P < 0.0001). Using a pooled list and giving preference to the longest ongoing cases first achieved 28.4% more complete breaks than assigning each clinician to serve sequential near-adjacent rooms, and having those clinicians prioritize the cases with the least predicted time until the end of surgery (95% confidence interval 27.7–29.1%). Sensitivity analyses showed that results were insensitive to the specific time windows for breaks. Sensitivity analyses also showed the mechanism. If every case in every room daily was the same surgical procedure, then the strategy of prioritizing cases with the least predicted time left would be comparable to prioritizing cases that have been ongoing the longest. However, in the presence of high coefficients of variability in surgical times, following log-normal distributions, prioritizing cases with the least predicted time left resulted in more incomplete breaks.

Conclusions

For each clinician in a suite giving breaks, assign them to a first room to break. Then, while the first set of breaks is being completed, choose the next set of rooms for breaks with preference to cases having been ongoing the longest.
在长时间工作的手术室,麻醉临床医生通常有午休时间。我们估计了决策过程在病例手术期间和两个小时窗口(例如上午11:00至下午1:00)完成的30分钟休息时间的相对影响百分比。方法对某大型教学医院15年的实际日期(N = 5481天)、三个手术室的手术室(N = 53)、手术次数(N = 460,354)和计划手术(N = 30,212)进行离散事件模拟。结果:与优先考虑持续时间最长的病例相比,优先给予离手术结束预计时间最短的病例的房间休息(P < 0.0001),前提是手术结束预计会晚到足以在休息后完成。对持续时间最长的病例进行偏好的合并列表(即使用单个队列)总体上导致了7.2%的完全中断,所有三个套房都实现了这些实质性的增加(所有四个P <; 0.0001)。使用汇总列表并优先考虑持续时间最长的病例,比分配每位临床医生服务顺序接近相邻的房间,并让这些临床医生优先考虑手术结束前预计时间最短的病例(95%置信区间为27.7-29.1%),完成休息时间多28.4%。敏感性分析表明,结果对断裂的具体时间窗不敏感。敏感性分析也揭示了其机理。如果每天每个房间的每个病例都是相同的外科手术,那么优先处理预计剩余时间最少的病例的策略将与优先处理持续时间最长的病例的策略相当。然而,在手术时间变异性系数较高的情况下,遵循对数正态分布,优先考虑预测剩余时间最少的病例导致更多的不完全骨折。对于每个在病房休息的临床医生,将他们分配到第一个房间休息。然后,当第一组休息完成时,选择下一组房间进行休息,优先考虑进行时间最长的情况。
{"title":"Queue management for the assignment of anesthesia clinician breaks to increase fractions completed before the end of surgical closure and during planned time windows","authors":"Franklin Dexter ,&nbsp;Sarah S. Titler ,&nbsp;Richard H. Epstein","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112136","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112136","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>At surgical suites with long workdays, anesthesia clinicians typically receive lunch breaks. We estimated the percentage relative impact of decision-making processes on 30-min breaks completed during cases' surgical periods and during two-hour windows (e.g., 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Discrete-event simulations of breaks were performed using a retrospective cohort of a large teaching hospital's 15 years of actual dates (<em>N</em> = 5481 days), operating rooms (<em>N</em> = 53) in three surgical suites, surgical times (<em>N</em> = 460,354), and scheduled procedures (N = 30,212).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Giving breaks preferentially to rooms with cases that had the least predicted time left until the end of surgery, provided the end of surgery was expected to be late enough to finish after the break, resulted in 16.5% fewer breaks versus giving preference to longest ongoing cases (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Pooled lists (i.e., using a single queue) with preferences for the longest ongoing cases resulted in overall 7.2% more complete breaks, with these substantive increases achieved for all three suites (all four P &lt; 0.0001). Using a pooled list and giving preference to the longest ongoing cases first achieved 28.4% more complete breaks than assigning each clinician to serve sequential near-adjacent rooms, and having those clinicians prioritize the cases with the least predicted time until the end of surgery (95% confidence interval 27.7–29.1%). Sensitivity analyses showed that results were insensitive to the specific time windows for breaks. Sensitivity analyses also showed the mechanism. If every case in every room daily was the same surgical procedure, then the strategy of prioritizing cases with the least predicted time left would be comparable to prioritizing cases that have been ongoing the longest. However, in the presence of high coefficients of variability in surgical times, following log-normal distributions, prioritizing cases with the least predicted time left resulted in more incomplete breaks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>For each clinician in a suite giving breaks, assign them to a first room to break. Then, while the first set of breaks is being completed, choose the next set of rooms for breaks with preference to cases having been ongoing the longest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 112136"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146074538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intravenous dexmedetomidine and its effects on remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and opioid consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 静脉注射右美托咪定及其对瑞芬太尼诱发的痛觉过敏和阿片类药物消费的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112138
Narinder P. Singh MD , Naveed T. Siddiqui MD , James Khan FRCPC , Jeetinder K. Makkar MD , Preet M. Singh MD , Cristian Arzola MD

Study objective

To evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in reducing remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (RIH) and its potential implications for acute opioid tolerance (AOT) in the adult surgical population.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting

Perioperative setting.

Patients

Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 803 patients.

Interventions

Intravenous dexmedetomidine.

Measurements

A comprehensive systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was performed from their inception through September 2024 to identify RCTs assessing the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in preventing RIH or AOT in the adult surgical population. Outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia, hyperalgesia incidence, opioid consumption, pain scores, and dexmedetomidine-related adverse events.

Main results

Dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged the time to first rescue analgesia (mean difference [MD] 46.08 min, 95% CI 30.52 to 61.65, p < 0.00001) and reduced opioid consumption in the postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 24 h postoperatively. Pain scores in PACU and up to 24 h were significantly lower with dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine also exhibited a moderate protective effect against primary hyperalgesia but was associated with a greater incidence of intraoperative bradycardia.

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine may mitigate RIH and, indirectly, aspects of AOT as suggested through surrogate outcomes such as opioid consumption and pain scores. However, significant heterogeneity limits certainty. While dexmedetomidine appears promising as an adjunct to remifentanil, careful monitoring for bradycardia is warranted. Further research should define optimal dosing strategies and clarify its role in preventing AOT.
研究目的评价右美托咪定在减少瑞芬太尼诱发的痛觉过敏(RIH)中的疗效及其对成人手术人群急性阿片类药物耐受(AOT)的潜在影响。设计系统回顾和荟萃分析。SettingPerioperative设置。患者:13项随机对照试验(RCTs),包括803例患者。InterventionsIntravenous dexmedetomidine。对PubMed、Embase和Scopus进行了全面的系统检索,从建立到2024年9月,以确定评估右美托咪定在成人手术人群中预防RIH或AOT有效性的随机对照试验。结果包括首次镇痛抢救时间、痛觉过敏发生率、阿片类药物消耗、疼痛评分和右美托咪定相关不良事件。主要结果右美托咪定显著延长了患者首次抢救镇痛的时间(平均差异[MD] 46.08 min, 95% CI 30.52 ~ 61.65, p < 0.00001),减少了术后麻醉护理单元(PACU)和术后24 h阿片类药物的使用。右美托咪定组PACU疼痛评分和24 h内疼痛评分显著降低。右美托咪定对原发性痛觉过敏也有中等保护作用,但术中心动过缓的发生率较高。结论右美托咪定可以缓解RIH,并通过阿片类药物消耗和疼痛评分等替代结果间接缓解AOT的某些方面。然而,显著的异质性限制了确定性。虽然右美托咪定作为瑞芬太尼的辅助药物似乎很有希望,但需要仔细监测心动过缓。进一步的研究应确定最佳给药策略,并阐明其在预防AOT中的作用。
{"title":"Intravenous dexmedetomidine and its effects on remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and opioid consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Narinder P. Singh MD ,&nbsp;Naveed T. Siddiqui MD ,&nbsp;James Khan FRCPC ,&nbsp;Jeetinder K. Makkar MD ,&nbsp;Preet M. Singh MD ,&nbsp;Cristian Arzola MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112138","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112138","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in reducing remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (RIH) and its potential implications for acute opioid tolerance (AOT) in the adult surgical population.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Perioperative setting.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 803 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Intravenous dexmedetomidine.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>A comprehensive systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was performed from their inception through September 2024 to identify RCTs assessing the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in preventing RIH or AOT in the adult surgical population. Outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia, hyperalgesia incidence, opioid consumption, pain scores, and dexmedetomidine-related adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>Dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged the time to first rescue analgesia (mean difference [MD] 46.08 min, 95% CI 30.52 to 61.65, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.00001) and reduced opioid consumption in the postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 24 h postoperatively. Pain scores in PACU and up to 24 h were significantly lower with dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine also exhibited a moderate protective effect against primary hyperalgesia but was associated with a greater incidence of intraoperative bradycardia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Dexmedetomidine may mitigate RIH and, indirectly, aspects of AOT as suggested through surrogate outcomes such as opioid consumption and pain scores. However, significant heterogeneity limits certainty. While dexmedetomidine appears promising as an adjunct to remifentanil, careful monitoring for bradycardia is warranted. Further research should define optimal dosing strategies and clarify its role in preventing AOT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 112138"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146074536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Desflurane versus propofol for ambulatory surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis 地氟醚与异丙酚用于门诊手术:系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112140
Wei Hu , Jing Zhuang , Xin Liu , Peng Zhang

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, side effects and recovery profile of two commonly used anesthetic agents, desflurane versus propofol, for maintaining general anesthesia in ambulatory surgery.

Methods

Studies compared propofol with desflurane in adult patients undergoing ambulatory surgery were included. The generalized pivotal method was used to estimate the median and variance of the ratios of means and standard deviations of recovery times, and these ratios were then pooled in a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis with Knapp-Hartung adjustment.

Results

Twenty-two studies with a total of 1504 adult participants were included in this review. Compared with propofol, desflurane significantly reduced early recovery times, with reductions of at least 9.1% in mean time and 4.2% in standard deviation (variability) (both based on the lower limit of the 99%CI), all significant after Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) correction. In contrast, no significant differences were observed for most intermediate and late recovery metrics. Desflurane increased the risk of in-hospital PONV (RR: 2.15, 95%CI: 1.12 to 4.11), and postoperative antiemetic rescue (RR: 2.59, 95%CI: 1.35 to 4.95), all significant after BH correction. The subgroup analysis indicated that adding N2O to desflurane was associated with an increased incidence of in-hospital PONV compared with propofol plus N2O.

Conclusions

In ambulatory surgery, desflurane demonstrated faster early recovery, higher incidence of in-hospital PONV and antiemetic rescue, compared with propofol. The reductions in mean time and variability for early recovery with desflurane could potentially contribute to improved operating room efficiency and lower labor costs. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.
本研究旨在评价地氟醚和异丙酚两种常用麻醉剂在门诊手术中维持全身麻醉的疗效、副作用和恢复情况。方法比较异丙酚和地氟醚在门诊手术患者中的应用。采用广义枢纽法估计恢复时间的均值和标准差比值的中位数和方差,然后将这些比值合并到dersimonan - laird随机效应荟萃分析中,并进行Knapp-Hartung调整。结果22项研究共纳入1504名成人受试者。与异丙酚相比,地氟醚显著减少早期恢复时间,平均时间减少至少9.1%,标准差(变异性)减少至少4.2%(均基于99%CI的下限),在benjamin - hochberg (BH)校正后均显著。相比之下,大多数中期和晚期恢复指标没有显著差异。地氟醚增加了院内PONV (RR: 2.15, 95%CI: 1.12 ~ 4.11)和术后止吐抢救(RR: 2.59, 95%CI: 1.35 ~ 4.95)的风险,在BH矫正后均显著增加。亚组分析表明,与异丙酚加N2O相比,地氟醚中添加N2O与院内PONV发生率增加有关。结论在门诊手术中,地氟醚与异丙酚相比,早期恢复更快,院内PONV发生率更高,止吐抢救率更高。地氟醚减少了早期恢复的平均时间和可变性,可能有助于提高手术室效率和降低人工成本。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
{"title":"Desflurane versus propofol for ambulatory surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Wei Hu ,&nbsp;Jing Zhuang ,&nbsp;Xin Liu ,&nbsp;Peng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112140","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112140","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, side effects and recovery profile of two commonly used anesthetic agents, desflurane versus propofol, for maintaining general anesthesia in ambulatory surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Studies compared propofol with desflurane in adult patients undergoing ambulatory surgery were included. The generalized pivotal method was used to estimate the median and variance of the ratios of means and standard deviations of recovery times, and these ratios were then pooled in a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis with Knapp-Hartung adjustment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-two studies with a total of 1504 adult participants were included in this review. Compared with propofol, desflurane significantly reduced early recovery times, with reductions of at least 9.1% in mean time and 4.2% in standard deviation (variability) (both based on the lower limit of the 99%CI), all significant after Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) correction. In contrast, no significant differences were observed for most intermediate and late recovery metrics. Desflurane increased the risk of in-hospital PONV (RR: 2.15, 95%CI: 1.12 to 4.11), and postoperative antiemetic rescue (RR: 2.59, 95%CI: 1.35 to 4.95), all significant after BH correction. The subgroup analysis indicated that adding N<sub>2</sub>O to desflurane was associated with an increased incidence of in-hospital PONV compared with propofol plus N<sub>2</sub>O.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In ambulatory surgery, desflurane demonstrated faster early recovery, higher incidence of in-hospital PONV and antiemetic rescue, compared with propofol. The reductions in mean time and variability for early recovery with desflurane could potentially contribute to improved operating room efficiency and lower labor costs. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 112140"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146074535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A framework for success: Compassionate interventions to support healthcare colleagues when concerns arise 成功的框架:有同情心的干预措施,在出现担忧时支持医疗保健同事
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112139
Michael G. Fitzsimons M.D. , Daniel Saddawi-Konefka M.D., M.B.A. , John Herman M.D. , Sarah Arnholz J.D. , Andy Gottlieb CNP , Keith H. Baker M.D., Ph.D.
Physicians suffer from the same medical, emotional, and psychiatric illnesses that those in non-medical careers do. These conditions may impair their performance, which could prove detrimental to the patients whose lives we are responsible for, especially in the specialty of anesthesiology. Yet, many physicians are reluctant to address their colleagues when performance appears impaired. In 2003, we implemented a substance use disorder (SUD) prevention program. Over the subsequent 20 years, the program evolved to include the critical component of professional intervention. Central to these interventions are prompt action, recognition of uncertainty, and a strong commitment to professionalism. The process emphasizes privacy, fairness, and dignity, with consistent application across all cases. Although our system arose from an effort to reduce substance use disorders, we believe that the process can be applied to other specialties even when drug testing is not involved.
医生和那些从事非医学职业的人一样,患有同样的医学、情感和精神疾病。这些情况可能会影响他们的表现,这可能会对我们负责的病人的生命有害,特别是在麻醉专业。然而,许多医生不愿意在他们的同事表现不佳时告诉他们。2003年,我们实施了物质使用障碍(SUD)预防计划。在随后的20年里,该计划发展到包括专业干预的关键组成部分。这些干预措施的核心是迅速采取行动,认识到不确定性,以及对专业精神的坚定承诺。这一过程强调隐私、公平和尊严,并在所有案件中始终如一地适用。虽然我们的系统源于减少物质使用障碍的努力,但我们相信,即使不涉及药物测试,该过程也可以应用于其他专业。
{"title":"A framework for success: Compassionate interventions to support healthcare colleagues when concerns arise","authors":"Michael G. Fitzsimons M.D. ,&nbsp;Daniel Saddawi-Konefka M.D., M.B.A. ,&nbsp;John Herman M.D. ,&nbsp;Sarah Arnholz J.D. ,&nbsp;Andy Gottlieb CNP ,&nbsp;Keith H. Baker M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112139","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112139","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Physicians suffer from the same medical, emotional, and psychiatric illnesses that those in non-medical careers do. These conditions may impair their performance, which could prove detrimental to the patients whose lives we are responsible for, especially in the specialty of anesthesiology. Yet, many physicians are reluctant to address their colleagues when performance appears impaired. In 2003, we implemented a substance use disorder (SUD) prevention program. Over the subsequent 20 years, the program evolved to include the critical component of professional intervention. Central to these interventions are prompt action, recognition of uncertainty, and a strong commitment to professionalism. The process emphasizes privacy, fairness, and dignity, with consistent application across all cases. Although our system arose from an effort to reduce substance use disorders, we believe that the process can be applied to other specialties even when drug testing is not involved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 112139"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146074537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
No simple answer: Choosing regional analgesia for hip fracture pain 没有简单的答案:选择局部镇痛髋部骨折疼痛
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112135
Saumith Menon BA , Dario Bugada MD PhD, ESRA-DRA , Edward R. Mariano MD, MAS, FASA, FASRA
{"title":"No simple answer: Choosing regional analgesia for hip fracture pain","authors":"Saumith Menon BA ,&nbsp;Dario Bugada MD PhD, ESRA-DRA ,&nbsp;Edward R. Mariano MD, MAS, FASA, FASRA","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112135","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112135","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 112135"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146023981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1