Assessing soil capacity and condition for “habitat of biodiversity” in the Lower Namoi Valley

Yijia Tang , Budiman Minasny, Alex McBratney, Ho Jun Jang
{"title":"Assessing soil capacity and condition for “habitat of biodiversity” in the Lower Namoi Valley","authors":"Yijia Tang ,&nbsp;Budiman Minasny,&nbsp;Alex McBratney,&nbsp;Ho Jun Jang","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Soil Security Assessment Framework (SSAF) has been proposed and developed as a concept to quantitatively ensure a sustainable future for soil, thereby supporting ecosystem sustainability. Evaluating the habitat of biodiversity quantitatively, particularly concerning bacterial communities, is crucial yet challenging, especially for the often-overlooked rare species. This study aims to utilise SSAF to assess the capacity and condition of soil function – the habitat of biodiversity, by examining bacterial communities to understand soil security within Lower Namoi Valley, NSW, Australia. We selected four indicators: relative abundance and alpha diversity of both soil abundant and rare bacterial communities, for capacity and condition, using the pedogenon concept. Our findings indicate significant variations in soil capacity and condition within the valley. Aggregating the indicators as utility scores revealed that the study area has a moderate capacity, with many regions in good condition relative to capacity, especially in less disturbed areas. Specifically, agricultural practices led to a significant increase in conditions for abundant bacterial communities but a decrease in rare bacterial communities. Less disturbed areas exhibited higher scores for rare sub-communities, suggesting better preservation of biodiversity. The study highlights the significant impact of human activities on soil habitat of biodiversity function in the Lower Namoi Valley. By integrating the analysis of abundant and rare microbial biodiversity into the soil security assessment framework, this study offers insights for soil management, advocating practices that support soil biodiversity to ensure long-term ecosystem sustainability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000261/pdfft?md5=28af5b3acd15a834d8f27ff780aaede0&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006224000261-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Soil Security Assessment Framework (SSAF) has been proposed and developed as a concept to quantitatively ensure a sustainable future for soil, thereby supporting ecosystem sustainability. Evaluating the habitat of biodiversity quantitatively, particularly concerning bacterial communities, is crucial yet challenging, especially for the often-overlooked rare species. This study aims to utilise SSAF to assess the capacity and condition of soil function – the habitat of biodiversity, by examining bacterial communities to understand soil security within Lower Namoi Valley, NSW, Australia. We selected four indicators: relative abundance and alpha diversity of both soil abundant and rare bacterial communities, for capacity and condition, using the pedogenon concept. Our findings indicate significant variations in soil capacity and condition within the valley. Aggregating the indicators as utility scores revealed that the study area has a moderate capacity, with many regions in good condition relative to capacity, especially in less disturbed areas. Specifically, agricultural practices led to a significant increase in conditions for abundant bacterial communities but a decrease in rare bacterial communities. Less disturbed areas exhibited higher scores for rare sub-communities, suggesting better preservation of biodiversity. The study highlights the significant impact of human activities on soil habitat of biodiversity function in the Lower Namoi Valley. By integrating the analysis of abundant and rare microbial biodiversity into the soil security assessment framework, this study offers insights for soil management, advocating practices that support soil biodiversity to ensure long-term ecosystem sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估纳莫伊河谷下游 "生物多样性栖息地 "的土壤容量和状况
土壤安全评估框架(SSAF)的提出和发展是为了从数量上确保土壤的可持续未来,从而支持生态系统的可持续性。定量评估生物多样性的栖息地,尤其是细菌群落的栖息地至关重要,但也极具挑战性,特别是对于经常被忽视的稀有物种而言。本研究旨在利用 SSAF 评估土壤功能(生物多样性的栖息地)的能力和状况,通过研究细菌群落来了解澳大利亚新南威尔士州下纳莫伊河谷的土壤安全状况。我们选择了四项指标:土壤中丰富细菌群落和稀有细菌群落的相对丰度和阿尔法多样性,利用 "pedogenon "概念来评估能力和状况。我们的研究结果表明,山谷内的土壤容量和状况差异很大。将各项指标汇总为效用分数后发现,研究区域的土壤容量适中,许多地区的土壤状况相对于容量而言较好,尤其是在受干扰较少的地区。具体而言,农业耕作导致大量细菌群落的条件显著增加,但稀有细菌群落的条件却有所下降。受干扰较少的地区稀有亚群落得分较高,表明生物多样性得到了更好的保护。这项研究强调了人类活动对下纳莫伊河谷土壤生境生物多样性功能的重大影响。通过将丰富和稀有微生物生物多样性分析纳入土壤安全评估框架,本研究为土壤管理提供了启示,倡导支持土壤生物多样性的做法,以确保生态系统的长期可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
期刊最新文献
Heavy metal pollution in farmland soils surrounding mining areas in China and the response of soil microbial communities Integration of indigenous and formal knowledge in the assessment of soil quality performance assessment using multiple factor analysis in Alborz central mountains Medium-term economic impacts of cover crop adoption in Maryland Using MIR and XRF spectroscopy to develop a heavy metal leaching potential model in Irish top soils Erratum regarding missing Conflict of Interest (COI) Statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1