Between a rock and a hard place: A geosocial approach to water insecurity in Kabul

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Water Security Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.wasec.2024.100177
Mohammad Daud Hamidi , Marco J. Haenssgen , Milica Vasiljevic , Hugh Chris Greenwell , Edward G.J. Stevenson
{"title":"Between a rock and a hard place: A geosocial approach to water insecurity in Kabul","authors":"Mohammad Daud Hamidi ,&nbsp;Marco J. Haenssgen ,&nbsp;Milica Vasiljevic ,&nbsp;Hugh Chris Greenwell ,&nbsp;Edward G.J. Stevenson","doi":"10.1016/j.wasec.2024.100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Approximately 50% of the global population currently experiences severe water scarcity, a situation likely to intensify due to climate change. At the same time, the poorest population segments bear the greatest burden of water insecurity. This intersection of geophysical, geochemical, and socio-economic dimensions of water (in)security challenges requires a geosocial perspective, one that attends simultaneously to geophysical, geochemical, and socio-economic dimensions. Our qualitative study, conducted through 68 semi-structured interviews across two distinct sub-basins in Kabul, revealed disparities in groundwater levels, water quality, water prices, and lived experiences of water insecurity. While environmental stressors like drought and groundwater contamination contribute to water insecurity, socio-economic factors such as gender and property ownership exacerbate these impacts: Women and children bear a heavy burden of securing water, with children’s involvement in water-fetching leading to instances of violence. Furthermore, trucked water costs 33 times that of piped water, echoing alarming global trends where less privileged communities endure disproportionately greater challenges of water inaccessibility. We outline policy implications for monitoring groundwater abstraction and underscore the need for tailored strategies to combat water scarcity, such as pro-poor water strategies. Additionally, our work draws attention to the role of local gatekeepers who have informally regulated water usage in response to drought-induced scarcity, particularly in the absence of functioning government policies, underscoring the importance of collaboration with local stakeholders to ensure sustainable access to water. We argue that a geosocial approach to water (in)security can provide high-resolution findings and reveal critical gaps between common metrics and the realities of water (in)security, which also underlines the need for integrated approaches incorporating both quantitative and qualitative research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37308,"journal":{"name":"Water Security","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468312424000130/pdfft?md5=c00132f6e28ca8cf195306044eb3c498&pid=1-s2.0-S2468312424000130-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468312424000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 50% of the global population currently experiences severe water scarcity, a situation likely to intensify due to climate change. At the same time, the poorest population segments bear the greatest burden of water insecurity. This intersection of geophysical, geochemical, and socio-economic dimensions of water (in)security challenges requires a geosocial perspective, one that attends simultaneously to geophysical, geochemical, and socio-economic dimensions. Our qualitative study, conducted through 68 semi-structured interviews across two distinct sub-basins in Kabul, revealed disparities in groundwater levels, water quality, water prices, and lived experiences of water insecurity. While environmental stressors like drought and groundwater contamination contribute to water insecurity, socio-economic factors such as gender and property ownership exacerbate these impacts: Women and children bear a heavy burden of securing water, with children’s involvement in water-fetching leading to instances of violence. Furthermore, trucked water costs 33 times that of piped water, echoing alarming global trends where less privileged communities endure disproportionately greater challenges of water inaccessibility. We outline policy implications for monitoring groundwater abstraction and underscore the need for tailored strategies to combat water scarcity, such as pro-poor water strategies. Additionally, our work draws attention to the role of local gatekeepers who have informally regulated water usage in response to drought-induced scarcity, particularly in the absence of functioning government policies, underscoring the importance of collaboration with local stakeholders to ensure sustainable access to water. We argue that a geosocial approach to water (in)security can provide high-resolution findings and reveal critical gaps between common metrics and the realities of water (in)security, which also underlines the need for integrated approaches incorporating both quantitative and qualitative research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介于岩石与坚硬之地之间:用地理社会方法解决喀布尔水资源不安全问题
目前,全球约有 50%的人口面临严重缺水问题,这种情况很可能因气候变化而加剧。与此同时,最贫困人口承受着水资源不安全的最大负担。水(不)安全挑战的地球物理、地球化学和社会经济层面相互交织,这就需要从地球社会的角度出发,同时关注地球物理、地球化学和社会经济层面。我们的定性研究通过对喀布尔两个不同的子流域进行 68 次半结构式访谈,揭示了地下水位、水质、水价和水资源不安全的生活体验方面的差异。干旱和地下水污染等环境压力因素造成了用水不安全,而性别和财产所有权等社会经济因素则加剧了这些影响:妇女和儿童承担着保障用水的沉重负担,儿童参与取水导致了暴力事件的发生。此外,卡车运水的成本是自来水的 33 倍,这也反映了令人担忧的全球趋势,即条件较差的社区因无法获得水而承受的挑战更大。我们概述了监测地下水抽取量的政策影响,并强调需要制定有针对性的战略来应对水资源短缺问题,如有利于穷人的水资源战略。此外,我们的研究还提请人们注意当地守门人的作用,他们在应对干旱引起的缺水问题时,特别是在缺乏有效的政府政策的情况下,对用水进行了非正式监管,这强调了与当地利益相关者合作以确保可持续用水的重要性。我们认为,对水(缺乏)安全问题采用地理社会方法可以提供高分辨率的研究结果,并揭示常见指标与水(缺乏)安全现实之间的关键差距,这也强调了采用定量和定性研究相结合的综合方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Security
Water Security Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Water Security aims to publish papers that contribute to a better understanding of the economic, social, biophysical, technological, and institutional influencers of current and future global water security. At the same time the journal intends to stimulate debate, backed by science, with strong interdisciplinary connections. The goal is to publish concise and timely reviews and synthesis articles about research covering the following elements of water security: -Shortage- Flooding- Governance- Health and Sanitation
期刊最新文献
Gender dimensions of water vending in LMICs: A scoping review The past, present, and future of Ghana’s WASH sector. An explorative analysis Using managed aquifer recharge to address land subsidence: Insights from a global literature review The syndemics of food and water insecurities on emotional distress and overall wellbeing in Ghana: Findings from a cross-sectional study More than Magnitude: Towards a multidimensional understanding of unprecedented weather to better support disaster management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1