Institutional forces, leapfrogging effects, and innovation status: Evidence from the adoption of a continuously evolving technology in small organizations

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123529
Wenshin Chen , Raffaele Filieri
{"title":"Institutional forces, leapfrogging effects, and innovation status: Evidence from the adoption of a continuously evolving technology in small organizations","authors":"Wenshin Chen ,&nbsp;Raffaele Filieri","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although SMEs' innovation adoption has been widely studied, little research has explored how SMEs strategize a continuously evolving technology in a complex institutional context over time. Drawing from institutional perspectives, our case study, based on 44 interviews and field observation, seeks to analyze how institutional forces interact with the Wi-Fi adoption process at three small organizations with different innovation statuses. Results reveal the significance of institutional forces in shaping small organizations' technology adoption process. At the knowledge stage, institutional forces stem from the champion's advocacy and institutional pressures. At the persuasion and implementation stages, they are embedded in organizations' actions in following the institutional trend and complying with institutional norms. At the confirmation stage, they can be observed in organizations' shaping institutional changes or leapfrogging institutional trends. These insights challenge and extend the traditional linear perspective of innovation diffusion and contribute to the literature on technology adoption, digital transformation, innovation leapfrogging, institutional theory, and SMEs. Managerially, we propose three strategic responses (i.e., trend reformulation, service differentiation, complete transformation) that urge SMEs to utilize leapfrogging effects of technologies to renovate their innovation status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524003251/pdfft?md5=b10e87c14004dba32cf0cb08fb2a17a9&pid=1-s2.0-S0040162524003251-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524003251","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although SMEs' innovation adoption has been widely studied, little research has explored how SMEs strategize a continuously evolving technology in a complex institutional context over time. Drawing from institutional perspectives, our case study, based on 44 interviews and field observation, seeks to analyze how institutional forces interact with the Wi-Fi adoption process at three small organizations with different innovation statuses. Results reveal the significance of institutional forces in shaping small organizations' technology adoption process. At the knowledge stage, institutional forces stem from the champion's advocacy and institutional pressures. At the persuasion and implementation stages, they are embedded in organizations' actions in following the institutional trend and complying with institutional norms. At the confirmation stage, they can be observed in organizations' shaping institutional changes or leapfrogging institutional trends. These insights challenge and extend the traditional linear perspective of innovation diffusion and contribute to the literature on technology adoption, digital transformation, innovation leapfrogging, institutional theory, and SMEs. Managerially, we propose three strategic responses (i.e., trend reformulation, service differentiation, complete transformation) that urge SMEs to utilize leapfrogging effects of technologies to renovate their innovation status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度力量、跃进效应和创新状况:小型组织采用不断发展的技术的证据
虽然对中小企业采用创新的研究很多,但很少有研究探讨中小企业如何在复杂的制度背景下制定持续发展的技术战略。我们的案例研究从制度视角出发,基于 44 个访谈和实地观察,试图分析制度力量如何与三个具有不同创新状况的小型组织的 Wi-Fi 采用过程相互作用。研究结果揭示了制度力量在小型组织技术采用过程中的重要作用。在知识阶段,制度力量来自倡导者的宣传和制度压力。在说服和实施阶段,制度力量蕴含在组织追随制度潮流和遵守制度规范的行动中。在确认阶段,它们体现在组织塑造制度变革或跨越制度趋势的过程中。这些见解挑战并扩展了创新扩散的传统线性视角,为有关技术采用、数字化转型、创新跨越、制度理论和中小企业的文献做出了贡献。在管理方面,我们提出了三项战略对策(即趋势重塑、服务差异化、全面转型),促使中小企业利用技术的跨越式效应革新自身的创新地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Social media mirage-the two actual selves of an individual: Conceptualization and scale development The time-varying impact of geopolitical relations on rare earth trade networks: What is the role of China's rare earth export restrictions? E-government and economic governance for global environmental performance: An exploration of sustainability typologies and transitions It's here to stay: Lessons, reflections, and visions on digital transformation amid public crisis Towards data and analytics driven B2B-banking for green finance: A cross-selling use case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1