Impact of agricultural credit on coffee productivity in Kenya

Richard Wamalwa Wanzala , Nyankomo Marwa , Elizabeth Nanziri Lwanga
{"title":"Impact of agricultural credit on coffee productivity in Kenya","authors":"Richard Wamalwa Wanzala ,&nbsp;Nyankomo Marwa ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Nanziri Lwanga","doi":"10.1016/j.wds.2024.100166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Historically, agricultural credit programs have been used as a policy instrument to improve agricultural productivity and livelihoods of smallholder farmers. The effectiveness of such credit programs has been widely deliberated with an opaque unanimity being reached since yield is stochastic. Therefore, this study examines the impact of agricultural credit provided by the Government of Kenya as an intervention to boost coffee productivity. Over the years, there has been little – if any – in-depth analysis that has been dedicated to establishing the impact of this agricultural credit on coffee productivity. This study surveyed 174 smallholder coffee farmers (participants and non-participants in the credit program) in Kiambu County in Kenya between 2015 and 2019. The paper espouses the DEA Malmquist index to estimate the efficiency of coffee productivity for participating and non-participating coffee farmers in the credit program. The empirical results disclose that participating farmers had the highest geomean for productivity change (152 %), efficiency change (40.5 %), technical change (53.2 %) and scale efficiency (40.5 %). Bayesian Modelling Average was used to assess determinants of coffee productivity. Bayesian Modelling Average (BMA) was used to assess determinants of coffee productivity. The findings from BMA analysis indicated that variety, education, extension visits and crop system had a positive impact on coffee productivity. Gender and age of farmer had a negative impact on coffee productivity. Thus, these insights from the empirical work would be instrumental in providing policy directions in terms of agricultural lending and crafting policies aimed at enhancing the efficiency of coffee productivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101285,"journal":{"name":"World Development Sustainability","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X24000442/pdfft?md5=ee0892bb0abcc770e0977b0c47db9716&pid=1-s2.0-S2772655X24000442-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X24000442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically, agricultural credit programs have been used as a policy instrument to improve agricultural productivity and livelihoods of smallholder farmers. The effectiveness of such credit programs has been widely deliberated with an opaque unanimity being reached since yield is stochastic. Therefore, this study examines the impact of agricultural credit provided by the Government of Kenya as an intervention to boost coffee productivity. Over the years, there has been little – if any – in-depth analysis that has been dedicated to establishing the impact of this agricultural credit on coffee productivity. This study surveyed 174 smallholder coffee farmers (participants and non-participants in the credit program) in Kiambu County in Kenya between 2015 and 2019. The paper espouses the DEA Malmquist index to estimate the efficiency of coffee productivity for participating and non-participating coffee farmers in the credit program. The empirical results disclose that participating farmers had the highest geomean for productivity change (152 %), efficiency change (40.5 %), technical change (53.2 %) and scale efficiency (40.5 %). Bayesian Modelling Average was used to assess determinants of coffee productivity. Bayesian Modelling Average (BMA) was used to assess determinants of coffee productivity. The findings from BMA analysis indicated that variety, education, extension visits and crop system had a positive impact on coffee productivity. Gender and age of farmer had a negative impact on coffee productivity. Thus, these insights from the empirical work would be instrumental in providing policy directions in terms of agricultural lending and crafting policies aimed at enhancing the efficiency of coffee productivity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业信贷对肯尼亚咖啡生产率的影响
从历史上看,农业信贷计划一直被用作提高农业生产力和改善小农生计的政策工具。由于产量具有随机性,因此此类信贷计划的有效性一直受到广泛讨论,但达成的一致意见并不透明。因此,本研究探讨了肯尼亚政府提供的农业信贷对提高咖啡生产率的影响。多年来,专门用于确定农业信贷对咖啡生产率影响的深入分析即使有,也是少之又少。本研究在 2015 年至 2019 年期间调查了肯尼亚基安布县的 174 名小农咖啡种植者(信贷计划的参与者和非参与者)。本文采用 DEA Malmquist 指数来估算参与和未参与信贷计划的咖啡种植农的咖啡生产效率。实证结果表明,参与计划的农户在生产率变化(152%)、效率变化(40.5%)、技术变化(53.2%)和规模效率(40.5%)方面的平均值最高。贝叶斯平均模型用于评估咖啡生产率的决定因素。贝叶斯平均模型(BMA)用于评估咖啡生产率的决定因素。贝叶斯平均模型分析结果表明,品种、教育、推广访问和作物系统对咖啡生产率有积极影响。农民的性别和年龄对咖啡生产率有负面影响。因此,实证研究的这些见解将有助于在农业贷款方面提供政策指导,并有助于制定旨在提高咖啡生产效率的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the relative size of agricultural exports matter for sustainable development? Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa On income inequality and CO2 emissions in Bangladesh Impact of public climate change adaptation policies on women's employment and poverty in Burkina Faso Why the impasse? The large dams debate and divergent perspectives Farmers’ preferences toward organic certification scheme: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Northern Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1