Impact of EHR on Realism, Skills, and Workload in Sepsis Simulation

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101560
Lauren M. Hess MD, ABPM-CI , Shailendra Das DO , Rathi Asaithambi MD, MPH, EdM , Erica Delbecq MD , Carolina Molleda Castro MD , Wallis Molchen DO , Daniel Lemke MD
{"title":"Impact of EHR on Realism, Skills, and Workload in Sepsis Simulation","authors":"Lauren M. Hess MD, ABPM-CI ,&nbsp;Shailendra Das DO ,&nbsp;Rathi Asaithambi MD, MPH, EdM ,&nbsp;Erica Delbecq MD ,&nbsp;Carolina Molleda Castro MD ,&nbsp;Wallis Molchen DO ,&nbsp;Daniel Lemke MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death for children. Simulation provides a framework for improvement in teamwork and communication, which are essential skills in conditions such as sepsis, where early recognition is crucial.</p><p>The purpose of this mixed methods project was to understand the effects of adding sandbox Electronic Health Record (EHR) on realism and team dynamics. This study was conducted during multidisciplinary (pediatric residents and nurses) in-situ sepsis simulations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was conducted during multidisciplinary (pediatric residents and nurses) in-situ sepsis simulations.</p><p>Groups were randomized to receive EHR or paper. Team clinical times were recorded. After completion, participants completed a survey about attitudes and workload, and some completed qualitative interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants in both groups wanted to have EHR in future simulations. Differences in workload and clinical times were not significantly different. Themes that emerged were: EHR improved realism allowing for skills practice but could be a distraction. Key elements for the simulated EHR design were identified and aligned with prior literature.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Acute care simulations that utilized EHR were perceived by learners to improve realism and can allow for skills practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death for children. Simulation provides a framework for improvement in teamwork and communication, which are essential skills in conditions such as sepsis, where early recognition is crucial.

The purpose of this mixed methods project was to understand the effects of adding sandbox Electronic Health Record (EHR) on realism and team dynamics. This study was conducted during multidisciplinary (pediatric residents and nurses) in-situ sepsis simulations.

Methods

This study was conducted during multidisciplinary (pediatric residents and nurses) in-situ sepsis simulations.

Groups were randomized to receive EHR or paper. Team clinical times were recorded. After completion, participants completed a survey about attitudes and workload, and some completed qualitative interviews.

Results

Participants in both groups wanted to have EHR in future simulations. Differences in workload and clinical times were not significantly different. Themes that emerged were: EHR improved realism allowing for skills practice but could be a distraction. Key elements for the simulated EHR design were identified and aligned with prior literature.

Conclusions

Acute care simulations that utilized EHR were perceived by learners to improve realism and can allow for skills practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子病历对败血症模拟的真实性、技能和工作量的影响
引言 败血症是导致儿童死亡的主要原因之一。本混合方法项目旨在了解添加沙盘电子健康记录(EHR)对真实感和团队动力的影响。本研究在多学科(儿科住院医师和护士)脓毒症现场模拟中进行。方法本研究在多学科(儿科住院医师和护士)脓毒症现场模拟中进行。记录团队的临床时间。模拟结束后,参与者完成了一份关于态度和工作量的调查,部分参与者完成了定性访谈。工作量和临床时间的差异并无明显不同。出现的主题有电子病历提高了技能练习的真实性,但可能会分散注意力。结论学习者认为使用电子病历的模拟急症护理提高了逼真度,可以进行技能练习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
期刊最新文献
Embracing quick response technology to bring assessments to life during simulation Combining storytelling and a scenario re-enactment of Mt. Everest expeditions to practice cognitive and social skills Psychometric Testing of NASA-TLX to Measure Learners’ Cognitive Load in Individual and Group Nursing Simulations Becoming a team player: Evaluating a simulation interprofessional activity between third year nursing students and second year medical radiation science students - A feasibility study Interprofessional Learning for Nursing Students during a Mass Casualty Incident Simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1