Greenness metrics of immunoassays for the detection of organophosphorus pesticide residues

IF 11.8 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Trends in Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.trac.2024.117828
Yang Liu , Lingling Guo , Ping Jin , Liqiang Liu , Xinxin Xu , Chuanlai Xu , Liguang Xu , Hua Kuang
{"title":"Greenness metrics of immunoassays for the detection of organophosphorus pesticide residues","authors":"Yang Liu ,&nbsp;Lingling Guo ,&nbsp;Ping Jin ,&nbsp;Liqiang Liu ,&nbsp;Xinxin Xu ,&nbsp;Chuanlai Xu ,&nbsp;Liguang Xu ,&nbsp;Hua Kuang","doi":"10.1016/j.trac.2024.117828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental protection has always been a hot topic, and the irresponsible use of organophosphorus pesticides has caused severe damage to the environment. The advantages of immunoassays for the detection of pesticides has allowed more researchers to develop and improve methods, in particular the performance of the assay, with few researchers considering the environmental impact of the method. The 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) represent a guide for the development of environmentally friendly analytical methods. Eco-Scale and Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) are assessment metrics based on GAC, where GAPI is used to assess the green characteristics of the entire analytical method from sample collection to final determination, and the difference in color gives an evaluation of the environmental impact involved in each step. In this paper, we modified GAPI to make it more suitable for the assessment of immunoassays, and combined it with Eco-Scale penalty rules to give scores for the sample preparation and assay steps, and finally to obtain the assessment results intuitively for the method so that researchers and users can choose. We used this tool for the immunoassay evaluation of chlorpyrifos in vegetables, and the method showed good reliability and consistency with scoring.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":439,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016599362400311X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental protection has always been a hot topic, and the irresponsible use of organophosphorus pesticides has caused severe damage to the environment. The advantages of immunoassays for the detection of pesticides has allowed more researchers to develop and improve methods, in particular the performance of the assay, with few researchers considering the environmental impact of the method. The 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) represent a guide for the development of environmentally friendly analytical methods. Eco-Scale and Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) are assessment metrics based on GAC, where GAPI is used to assess the green characteristics of the entire analytical method from sample collection to final determination, and the difference in color gives an evaluation of the environmental impact involved in each step. In this paper, we modified GAPI to make it more suitable for the assessment of immunoassays, and combined it with Eco-Scale penalty rules to give scores for the sample preparation and assay steps, and finally to obtain the assessment results intuitively for the method so that researchers and users can choose. We used this tool for the immunoassay evaluation of chlorpyrifos in vegetables, and the method showed good reliability and consistency with scoring.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检测有机磷农药残留的免疫测定绿色度量标准
环境保护一直是一个热门话题,不负责任地使用有机磷农药对环境造成了严重破坏。免疫测定法在检测农药方面的优势让更多的研究人员开发和改进方法,特别是检测性能,但很少有研究人员考虑到方法对环境的影响。绿色分析化学(GAC)的 12 项原则是开发环境友好型分析方法的指南。生态尺度(Eco-Scale)和绿色分析程序指数(GAPI)是基于 GAC 的评估指标,其中 GAPI 用于评估从样品采集到最终测定的整个分析方法的绿色特性,通过颜色的差异来评估每个步骤对环境的影响。在本文中,我们对 GAPI 进行了修改,使其更适用于免疫分析的评估,并将其与 Eco-Scale 惩罚规则相结合,对样品制备和测定步骤进行打分,最终直观地得出方法的评估结果,以便研究人员和用户进行选择。我们将该工具用于蔬菜中毒死蜱的免疫测定评估,该方法显示出良好的可靠性和评分一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Trends in Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
4.60%
发文量
257
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: TrAC publishes succinct and critical overviews of recent advancements in analytical chemistry, designed to assist analytical chemists and other users of analytical techniques. These reviews offer excellent, up-to-date, and timely coverage of various topics within analytical chemistry. Encompassing areas such as analytical instrumentation, biomedical analysis, biomolecular analysis, biosensors, chemical analysis, chemometrics, clinical chemistry, drug discovery, environmental analysis and monitoring, food analysis, forensic science, laboratory automation, materials science, metabolomics, pesticide-residue analysis, pharmaceutical analysis, proteomics, surface science, and water analysis and monitoring, these critical reviews provide comprehensive insights for practitioners in the field.
期刊最新文献
Analytical techniques for assessing antimicrobial resistance: Conventional solutions, contemporary problems and futuristic outlooks Current insights into the implementation of electrochemical sensors for comprehensive detection and analysis of radionuclides Multifarious biosensors for highly efficient bleomycin detection: Recent trends, different methods, and future directions Recent progresses and challenges on mesoporous silica nanoparticles for DNA-based biosensors and diagnostics Electrochemical immunosensors: Application to surveillance of contaminants of emerging concern in aquatic ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1