Cultural tightness in organizations: Investigating the impact of formal and informal cultural tightness on employee creativity

IF 3.4 2区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104338
Roy Chua , Na Zhao , Meng Han
{"title":"Cultural tightness in organizations: Investigating the impact of formal and informal cultural tightness on employee creativity","authors":"Roy Chua ,&nbsp;Na Zhao ,&nbsp;Meng Han","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper delineates cultural tightness into formal versus informal aspects to depict the strength of norms and the extent of sanctions emanating from both formal and informal norms. Organizations with high formal cultural tightness regulate behaviors through explicit written norms and official sanctions, whereas those with high informal cultural tightness regulate behaviors through uncodified norms, collective beliefs, and informal social sanctions. Through a field study across 14 diverse companies in two countries (Malaysia and the Philippines) and two experiments involving participants from the United States, we found that perceived informal cultural tightness consistently exerts a more significant impact on stifling employee creativity than perceived formal cultural tightness. Additionally, we discovered that these two aspects of cultural tightness also potentially interact to influence employee creativity. Lastly, we identified promotion-focused (but not prevention-focused) self-regulation as a likely mechanism through which informal cultural tightness affects employee creativity. These findings contribute to cultural tightness-looseness theory and research on how organizational culture affects employee creativity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48442,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 104338"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074959782400030X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper delineates cultural tightness into formal versus informal aspects to depict the strength of norms and the extent of sanctions emanating from both formal and informal norms. Organizations with high formal cultural tightness regulate behaviors through explicit written norms and official sanctions, whereas those with high informal cultural tightness regulate behaviors through uncodified norms, collective beliefs, and informal social sanctions. Through a field study across 14 diverse companies in two countries (Malaysia and the Philippines) and two experiments involving participants from the United States, we found that perceived informal cultural tightness consistently exerts a more significant impact on stifling employee creativity than perceived formal cultural tightness. Additionally, we discovered that these two aspects of cultural tightness also potentially interact to influence employee creativity. Lastly, we identified promotion-focused (but not prevention-focused) self-regulation as a likely mechanism through which informal cultural tightness affects employee creativity. These findings contribute to cultural tightness-looseness theory and research on how organizational culture affects employee creativity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织中的文化紧密性:调查正式和非正式文化紧密度对员工创造力的影响
本文将文化紧密度划分为正式和非正式两个方面,以描述正式和非正式规范的强度和制裁程度。正式文化紧密度高的组织通过明确的成文规范和官方制裁来规范行为,而非正式文化紧密度高的组织则通过非成文规范、集体信仰和非正式社会制裁来规范行为。通过对两个国家(马来西亚和菲律宾)的 14 家不同公司进行实地研究,以及对来自美国的参与者进行两次实验,我们发现,与感知到的正式文化紧密度相比,感知到的非正式文化紧密度对扼杀员工创造力的影响更为显著。此外,我们还发现,文化紧密度的这两个方面也可能相互作用,影响员工的创造力。最后,我们发现以促进为重点(而不是以预防为重点)的自我调节可能是非正式文化严密性影响员工创造力的一种机制。这些发现为文化松紧度理论以及组织文化如何影响员工创造力的研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes publishes fundamental research in organizational behavior, organizational psychology, and human cognition, judgment, and decision-making. The journal features articles that present original empirical research, theory development, meta-analysis, and methodological advancements relevant to the substantive domains served by the journal. Topics covered by the journal include perception, cognition, judgment, attitudes, emotion, well-being, motivation, choice, and performance. We are interested in articles that investigate these topics as they pertain to individuals, dyads, groups, and other social collectives. For each topic, we place a premium on articles that make fundamental and substantial contributions to understanding psychological processes relevant to human attitudes, cognitions, and behavior in organizations. In order to be considered for publication in OBHDP a manuscript has to include the following: 1.Demonstrate an interesting behavioral/psychological phenomenon 2.Make a significant theoretical and empirical contribution to the existing literature 3.Identify and test the underlying psychological mechanism for the newly discovered behavioral/psychological phenomenon 4.Have practical implications in organizational context
期刊最新文献
The inclusion of anchors when seeking advice: Causes and consequences Joining disconnected others reduces social identity threat in women brokers Retraction notice to “Don’t stop believing: Rituals improve performance by decreasing anxiety” [Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 137C (2016) 71–85] The confrontation effect: When users engage more with ideology-inconsistent content online A Numeracy-Task interaction model of perceived differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1