Statistical analysis plan for the SQUEEZE trial: A trial to determine whether septic shock reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy vs. usual care (SQUEEZE)

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care and Resuscitation Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.02.002
Melissa J. Parker MD, MSc , Gary Foster PhD , Alison Fox-Robichaud MD, MSc , Karen Choong MB BCh, MSc , Lawrence Mbuagbaw MD, PhD , Lehana Thabane PhD , With the SQUEEZE Trial Steering Committee and on behalf of the SQUEEZE Trial Investigators, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Pediatric Emergency Research Canada, and the Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group
{"title":"Statistical analysis plan for the SQUEEZE trial: A trial to determine whether septic shock reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy vs. usual care (SQUEEZE)","authors":"Melissa J. Parker MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Gary Foster PhD ,&nbsp;Alison Fox-Robichaud MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Karen Choong MB BCh, MSc ,&nbsp;Lawrence Mbuagbaw MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lehana Thabane PhD ,&nbsp;With the SQUEEZE Trial Steering Committee and on behalf of the SQUEEZE Trial Investigators, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Pediatric Emergency Research Canada, and the Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The SQUEEZE trial is a multicentred randomized controlled trial which seeks to determine the optimal approach to fluid resuscitation in paediatric septic shock. SQUEEZE also includes a nested translational study, SQUEEZE-D, investigating the value of plasma cell-free DNA for prediction of clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To present a pre-specified statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the SQUEEZE trial prior to finalizing the trial data set and prior to commencing data analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>SQUEEZE is a pragmatic, two-arm, open-label, prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Canadian paediatric tertiary care centres.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Paediatric patients with suspected sepsis and persistent signs of shock in need of ongoing resuscitation. Sample size target: 400 participants.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The trial is designed to compare a fluid-sparing resuscitation strategy to usual care.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome for the SQUEEZE trial is the time to shock reversal (in hours). The primary outcome analysis will assess the difference in time to shock reversal between the intervention and control groups, reported as point estimate with 95% confidence intervals. The statistical test for the primary analysis will be a two-sided t-test. Secondary outcome measures include clinical outcomes and adverse events including measures of organ dysfunction and mortality outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The SAP presented here is reflective of and where necessary clarifies in detail the analysis plan as presented in the trial protocol. The SAP includes a mock CONSORT diagram, figures and tables. Data collection methods are summarized, primary and secondary outcomes are defined, and outcome analyses are described.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We have developed a statistical analysis plan for the SQUEEZE Trial for transparency and to align with best practices. Analysis of SQUEEZE Trial data will adhere to the SAP to reduce the risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: Definitive trial NCT03080038; Registered Feb 28, 2017. Pilot Trial NCT 01973907; Registered Oct 27, 2013.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144127722400005X/pdfft?md5=53a156cc434d1a572db1b8d0726b35e8&pid=1-s2.0-S144127722400005X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144127722400005X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The SQUEEZE trial is a multicentred randomized controlled trial which seeks to determine the optimal approach to fluid resuscitation in paediatric septic shock. SQUEEZE also includes a nested translational study, SQUEEZE-D, investigating the value of plasma cell-free DNA for prediction of clinical outcomes.

Objective

To present a pre-specified statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the SQUEEZE trial prior to finalizing the trial data set and prior to commencing data analysis.

Design

SQUEEZE is a pragmatic, two-arm, open-label, prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Canadian paediatric tertiary care centres.

Participants

Paediatric patients with suspected sepsis and persistent signs of shock in need of ongoing resuscitation. Sample size target: 400 participants.

Interventions

The trial is designed to compare a fluid-sparing resuscitation strategy to usual care.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome for the SQUEEZE trial is the time to shock reversal (in hours). The primary outcome analysis will assess the difference in time to shock reversal between the intervention and control groups, reported as point estimate with 95% confidence intervals. The statistical test for the primary analysis will be a two-sided t-test. Secondary outcome measures include clinical outcomes and adverse events including measures of organ dysfunction and mortality outcomes.

Results

The SAP presented here is reflective of and where necessary clarifies in detail the analysis plan as presented in the trial protocol. The SAP includes a mock CONSORT diagram, figures and tables. Data collection methods are summarized, primary and secondary outcomes are defined, and outcome analyses are described.

Conclusions

We have developed a statistical analysis plan for the SQUEEZE Trial for transparency and to align with best practices. Analysis of SQUEEZE Trial data will adhere to the SAP to reduce the risk of bias.

Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: Definitive trial NCT03080038; Registered Feb 28, 2017. Pilot Trial NCT 01973907; Registered Oct 27, 2013.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SQUEEZE 试验的统计分析计划:一项试验旨在确定随机接受早期目标导向液体节约策略与常规护理(SQUEEZE)的儿科患者的脓毒性休克逆转是否更快
背景SQUEEZE试验是一项多中心随机对照试验,旨在确定儿科脓毒性休克液体复苏的最佳方法。SQUEEZE 还包括一项巢式转化研究 SQUEEZE-D,该研究旨在调查血浆无细胞 DNA 在预测临床结果方面的价值。目的在最终确定试验数据集和开始数据分析之前,为 SQUEEZE 试验提供一份预先指定的统计分析计划 (SAP)。设计SQUEEZE是一项务实、双臂、开放标签、前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。设置加拿大儿科三级医疗中心。参与者疑似败血症且有持续休克迹象、需要持续复苏的儿科患者。SQUEEZE试验的主要结果是休克逆转时间(小时)。主要结果分析将评估干预组和对照组休克逆转时间的差异,以点估计值和 95% 置信区间报告。主要分析的统计检验将采用双侧 t 检验。次要结果测量包括临床结果和不良事件,其中包括器官功能障碍和死亡率结果的测量。结果本文介绍的 SAP 反映了试验方案中的分析计划,并在必要时进行了详细说明。SAP 包括模拟 CONSORT 图、图和表。我们为 SQUEEZE 试验制定了统计分析计划,以提高透明度并与最佳实践保持一致。对 SQUEEZE 试验数据的分析将遵循 SAP,以降低偏倚风险。RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifiers:确定性试验 NCT03080038; 注册日期:2017 年 2 月 28 日。试验性试验 NCT 01973907;注册时间 2013 年 10 月 27 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Critical Care and Resuscitation CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines. The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world. The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Recommendations for the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM) trainee research project: A modified Delphi study ARDS, guidelines and ANZ practice: The persistent disconnect Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study Sonographic evaluation of intracranial hemodynamics and pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An exploratory sub-study of the TAME trial A retrospective registry-based study into the proportion of patients admitted to intensive care who have anaphylaxis as a principal diagnosis and their outcomes in Australia and New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1