Exergo-economic approach for comprehensive evaluation of the performance of industrial-scale milk and coffee beverage process lines

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Food and Bioproducts Processing Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.fbp.2024.06.007
Gamze Kor Simsek , Filiz Icier
{"title":"Exergo-economic approach for comprehensive evaluation of the performance of industrial-scale milk and coffee beverage process lines","authors":"Gamze Kor Simsek ,&nbsp;Filiz Icier","doi":"10.1016/j.fbp.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to perform comprehensive analyses of the performance of the industrial-scale production of three different beverages (whole milk, black coffee, and milk coffee) in carton aseptic and glass bottle packaging process lines from raw material to the secondary packed final product by using innovative exergo-economic approach to promote a detailed data for a sustainable, performance-efficient production and economy in beverage industry. System performance efficiencies (energy and exergy) for the whole of production lines and individual processing steps were determined, and the exergo-economic performance of the industrial productions of three different beverages was compared. The maximum overall exergy efficiencies for glass bottle and carton aseptic packaging lines were as 52.57 % and 55.90 %, respectively, in whole milk production whereas the minimum overall exergy efficiencies were for these lines were 47.39 % and 48.67 %, respectively, for milk coffee production. For whole milk, the process steps having the minimum exergy efficiency were the filling step in carton aseptic (23.14 %±1.25) and the seperation step (26.90 %±1.09) in glass bottle packaging lines. For black coffee and milk coffee productions, the process step with the highest improvement potential was the homogenization/deaeration step for both carton aseptic and glass bottle packaging lines. The highest exergy destruction costs were obtained for the milk coffee; 72.52±0.03$/MJ for carton aseptic package and 63.82±1.85$/MJ for glass bottle. The most cost-efficient process was determined to be the black coffee in the carton aseptic packaging line due to the minimum product cost rate (89.71±2.39 $/MJ). It is thought that this study contributes valuable information on the approach of the comparing the performance of different production lines using exergo-economic evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12134,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308524001111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to perform comprehensive analyses of the performance of the industrial-scale production of three different beverages (whole milk, black coffee, and milk coffee) in carton aseptic and glass bottle packaging process lines from raw material to the secondary packed final product by using innovative exergo-economic approach to promote a detailed data for a sustainable, performance-efficient production and economy in beverage industry. System performance efficiencies (energy and exergy) for the whole of production lines and individual processing steps were determined, and the exergo-economic performance of the industrial productions of three different beverages was compared. The maximum overall exergy efficiencies for glass bottle and carton aseptic packaging lines were as 52.57 % and 55.90 %, respectively, in whole milk production whereas the minimum overall exergy efficiencies were for these lines were 47.39 % and 48.67 %, respectively, for milk coffee production. For whole milk, the process steps having the minimum exergy efficiency were the filling step in carton aseptic (23.14 %±1.25) and the seperation step (26.90 %±1.09) in glass bottle packaging lines. For black coffee and milk coffee productions, the process step with the highest improvement potential was the homogenization/deaeration step for both carton aseptic and glass bottle packaging lines. The highest exergy destruction costs were obtained for the milk coffee; 72.52±0.03$/MJ for carton aseptic package and 63.82±1.85$/MJ for glass bottle. The most cost-efficient process was determined to be the black coffee in the carton aseptic packaging line due to the minimum product cost rate (89.71±2.39 $/MJ). It is thought that this study contributes valuable information on the approach of the comparing the performance of different production lines using exergo-economic evaluation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合评估工业规模牛奶和咖啡饮料加工生产线性能的 Exergo-economic 方法
本研究旨在采用创新的能效经济学方法,全面分析在纸箱无菌包装和玻璃瓶包装生产线上生产三种不同饮料(全脂牛奶、黑咖啡和牛奶咖啡)时,从原材料到二次包装最终产品的能效情况,从而为饮料行业的可持续能效生产和经济性提供详细数据。确定了整条生产线和各个加工步骤的系统性能效率(能量和放能),并比较了三种不同饮料工业生产的放能经济效益。在全脂牛奶生产中,玻璃瓶和纸箱无菌包装生产线的最高总能效分别为 52.57 % 和 55.90 %,而在牛奶咖啡生产中,这些生产线的最低总能效分别为 47.39 % 和 48.67 %。就全脂牛奶而言,能效最低的工艺步骤是纸箱无菌灌装步骤(23.14 %±1.25)和玻璃瓶包装线的分离步骤(26.90 %±1.09)。对于黑咖啡和牛奶咖啡的生产,纸箱无菌包装线和玻璃瓶包装线中改进潜力最大的工艺步骤是均质/脱气步骤。牛奶咖啡的放能破坏成本最高;纸箱无菌包装为 72.52±0.03 美元/兆焦耳,玻璃瓶包装为 63.82±1.85 美元/兆焦耳。由于产品成本低(89.71±2.39 美元/MJ),在纸盒无菌包装生产线中,黑咖啡被确定为最具成本效益的工艺。我们认为,这项研究为使用外经济评价法比较不同生产线的性能提供了有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Bioproducts Processing
Food and Bioproducts Processing 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering: Part C FBP aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in the branches of engineering and science dedicated to the safe processing of biological products. It is the only journal to exploit the synergy between biotechnology, bioprocessing and food engineering. Papers showing how research results can be used in engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in equipment or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of food and bioproducts processing. The journal has a strong emphasis on the interface between engineering and food or bioproducts. Papers that are not likely to be published are those: • Primarily concerned with food formulation • That use experimental design techniques to obtain response surfaces but gain little insight from them • That are empirical and ignore established mechanistic models, e.g., empirical drying curves • That are primarily concerned about sensory evaluation and colour • Concern the extraction, encapsulation and/or antioxidant activity of a specific biological material without providing insight that could be applied to a similar but different material, • Containing only chemical analyses of biological materials.
期刊最新文献
Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of antibacterial properties of silver/ carboxymethyl cellulose/ bacterial cellulose/ Clitoria ternatea extract aerogel composites Freeze, spray, and vacuum dried Camelina sativa protein powders and their physicochemical and functional properties Exploring solution composition and vacuum pulse effects in the osmotic processing of sole (Paralichthys sp.) fillets Nanoencapsulation of Spirulina sp. LEB 18 microalgae biomass using electrospray technique and application in chocolate milk Construction and characteristics of EGCG-porcine serum albumin pickering emulsion: Based on noncovalent interactions mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1