Pilot evaluation of a self-help ACT intervention for palliative care patients

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100797
Christopher L. Martin , Kenneth I. Pakenham
{"title":"Pilot evaluation of a self-help ACT intervention for palliative care patients","authors":"Christopher L. Martin ,&nbsp;Kenneth I. Pakenham","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This pilot study evaluates the feasibility and efficacy of a brief (four-week) predominantly self-help acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention (“Full Palliative Living”) in improving palliative patient primary outcomes (death attitudes, distress, pain, and quality of life) and a secondary outcome psychological flexibility (PF) within a palliative care (PC) setting. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent group design was used with pre- and post-intervention assessments with two groups: intervention (<em>n</em> = 52) and comparison (<em>n</em> = 54). Across three sets of analyses (mixed within/between ANCOVAs, intervention group t-tests and reliable change index), results demonstrated beneficial intervention effects for distress and PF at post-intervention. Mediation analyses showed that increases in PF mediated improvements in distress. Feasibility of delivering the intervention in a frontline PC service was supported by intervention acceptability and adherence ratings, intervention engagement, and participants’ perceptions of intervention helpfulness. The intervention effects on distress are noteworthy given the high prevalence of distress and the self-reported prioritisation of help-seeking for distress among PC patients. The Full Palliative Living program has the potential to make a significant contribution to a holistic approach to PC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100797"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000772/pdfft?md5=76fa254e609585c4ba75d7a0a16ed116&pid=1-s2.0-S2212144724000772-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000772","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This pilot study evaluates the feasibility and efficacy of a brief (four-week) predominantly self-help acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention (“Full Palliative Living”) in improving palliative patient primary outcomes (death attitudes, distress, pain, and quality of life) and a secondary outcome psychological flexibility (PF) within a palliative care (PC) setting. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent group design was used with pre- and post-intervention assessments with two groups: intervention (n = 52) and comparison (n = 54). Across three sets of analyses (mixed within/between ANCOVAs, intervention group t-tests and reliable change index), results demonstrated beneficial intervention effects for distress and PF at post-intervention. Mediation analyses showed that increases in PF mediated improvements in distress. Feasibility of delivering the intervention in a frontline PC service was supported by intervention acceptability and adherence ratings, intervention engagement, and participants’ perceptions of intervention helpfulness. The intervention effects on distress are noteworthy given the high prevalence of distress and the self-reported prioritisation of help-seeking for distress among PC patients. The Full Palliative Living program has the potential to make a significant contribution to a holistic approach to PC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对姑息治疗患者的自助式 ACT 干预试点评估
这项试点研究评估了在姑息治疗(PC)环境中,以接受与承诺疗法(ACT)为主的简短(四周)自助干预("完全姑息生活")在改善姑息治疗患者主要结果(死亡态度、痛苦、疼痛和生活质量)和次要结果心理灵活性(PF)方面的可行性和有效性。该研究采用准实验性非等效组设计,在干预前和干预后对两组进行评估:干预组(n = 52)和对比组(n = 54)。通过三组分析(组内/组间混合方差分析、干预组 t 检验和可靠变化指数),结果表明干预对干预后的困扰和 PF 有益。中介分析表明,PF 的增加对困扰的改善有中介作用。干预的可接受性和依从性评分、干预的参与度以及参与者对干预有用性的看法都证明了在一线个人护理服务中实施干预的可行性。鉴于PC患者的痛苦发生率较高,且自我报告的痛苦求助优先级较高,因此干预对痛苦的影响值得注意。全程姑息生活计划有可能为PC综合治疗方法做出重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of a brief, remote self-compassion intervention for employed mothers Exploring the interconnectedness of depression, anxiety, diabetes distress, and related psychosocial factors in adults with type 2 diabetes: A network analysis Effects of a randomized controlled trial of mobile app-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on depressive symptoms and process variables in college students - Focusing on the mediating effects of acceptance and cognitive defusion- Changes in university students’ behaviour and study burnout risk during ACT-based online course intervention: A mixed methods study Third wave interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1