Mind over chronic pain: A meta-analysis of cognitive restructuring in chronically ill adults

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Psychosomatic Research Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111837
Sebastian Pintea , Paula Maier
{"title":"Mind over chronic pain: A meta-analysis of cognitive restructuring in chronically ill adults","authors":"Sebastian Pintea ,&nbsp;Paula Maier","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This meta-analysis synthesizes research on the impact of cognitive restructuring on chronic pain intensity, aiming to integrate diverse methodologies and findings while evaluating potential moderators.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, JSTOR, Sage, Social Science Research Network, PsycArticles, ScienceDirect, and Education Resources Information Center) until July 2023. Studies involving adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with chronic conditions who underwent cognitive restructuring to reduce chronic pain intensity, were included. Eligible studies compared this intervention with a control group. We excluded studies incorporating cognitive restructuring within broader interventions, lacking statistical data, or not written in English. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After reviewing 18,312 studies, we selected 11 studies published between 1991 and 2022, involving 693 participants with chronic conditions. A significant large overall effect size was found (<em>d</em> = 0.94, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.40). Moderation analyses revealed significant differences based on sex and study quality, with effects less pronounced among females and more substantial in higher-quality studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite limitations such as statistical instability due to a small number of studies in certain moderator categories and methodological variability, this meta-analysis highlights the robust effects of cognitive restructuring on chronic pain intensity. The findings are valuable for guiding power calculations and future research expectations. Clinically, these results support the significant effect of cognitive restructuring in both individual and group settings, regardless of age, particularly when facilitated by teams that include psychologists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924002496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This meta-analysis synthesizes research on the impact of cognitive restructuring on chronic pain intensity, aiming to integrate diverse methodologies and findings while evaluating potential moderators.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, JSTOR, Sage, Social Science Research Network, PsycArticles, ScienceDirect, and Education Resources Information Center) until July 2023. Studies involving adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with chronic conditions who underwent cognitive restructuring to reduce chronic pain intensity, were included. Eligible studies compared this intervention with a control group. We excluded studies incorporating cognitive restructuring within broader interventions, lacking statistical data, or not written in English. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2).

Results

After reviewing 18,312 studies, we selected 11 studies published between 1991 and 2022, involving 693 participants with chronic conditions. A significant large overall effect size was found (d = 0.94, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.40). Moderation analyses revealed significant differences based on sex and study quality, with effects less pronounced among females and more substantial in higher-quality studies.

Conclusion

Despite limitations such as statistical instability due to a small number of studies in certain moderator categories and methodological variability, this meta-analysis highlights the robust effects of cognitive restructuring on chronic pain intensity. The findings are valuable for guiding power calculations and future research expectations. Clinically, these results support the significant effect of cognitive restructuring in both individual and group settings, regardless of age, particularly when facilitated by teams that include psychologists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心灵战胜慢性疼痛:对慢性病成人认知重组的荟萃分析
方法根据PRISMA指南,我们系统地检索了多个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、JSTOR、Sage、Social Science Research Network、PsycArticles、ScienceDirect和教育资源信息中心),直至2023年7月。纳入的研究涉及被诊断患有慢性疾病的成年人(≥18 岁),他们通过认知重组来减轻慢性疼痛的强度。符合条件的研究将这一干预措施与对照组进行了比较。我们排除了将认知重组纳入更广泛的干预措施、缺乏统计数据或不是用英语撰写的研究。我们使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)对研究质量进行了评估。结果在回顾了 18,312 项研究后,我们选出了 1991 年至 2022 年间发表的 11 项研究,涉及 693 名慢性病患者。研究发现,总体效应规模较大(d = 0.94,95% CI 0.48 至 1.40)。尽管存在一些局限性,如某些调节因子类别的研究数量较少导致统计不稳定性,以及方法上的可变性,但这项荟萃分析强调了认知重组对慢性疼痛强度的显著效果。研究结果对于指导功率计算和未来研究预期非常有价值。在临床上,这些结果支持认知重组在个人和团体环境中的显著效果,无论年龄大小,尤其是在包括心理学家在内的团队协助下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
期刊最新文献
Caregiving, caring intensity, and allostatic load: A comparison of caring to others inside and outside the home Childhood maltreatment, cognitive performance, and cognitive decline in middle-aged and older adults with chronic disease: A prospective study Most people do not attribute their burnout symptoms to work Unlike other medical conditions, type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for new-onset major depression after COVID-19 The role of self-efficacy and tangible support in managing depression in fibromyalgia: Expanding social support strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1