A hydrologic signature approach to analysing wildfire impacts on overland flow

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science Hydrological Processes Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1002/hyp.15215
L. A. Bolotin, H. McMillan
{"title":"A hydrologic signature approach to analysing wildfire impacts on overland flow","authors":"L. A. Bolotin,&nbsp;H. McMillan","doi":"10.1002/hyp.15215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Post-fire flooding and debris flows are often triggered by increased overland flow resulting from wildfire impacts on soil infiltration capacity and surface roughness. Increasing wildfire activity and intensification of precipitation with climate change make improving understanding of post-fire overland flow a particularly pertinent task. Hydrologic signatures, which are metrics that summarize the hydrologic regime of watersheds using rainfall and runoff time series, can be calculated for large samples of watersheds relatively easily to understand post-fire hydrologic processes. We demonstrate that signatures designed specifically for overland flow reflect changes to overland flow processes with wildfire that align with previous case studies on burned watersheds. For example, signatures suggest increases in infiltration-excess overland flow and decrease in saturation-excess overland flow in the first and second years after wildfire in the majority of watersheds examined. We show that climate, watershed and wildfire attributes can predict either post-fire signatures of overland flow or changes in signature values with wildfire using machine learning. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), air temperature, amount of developed/undeveloped land, soil thickness and clay content were the most used predictors by well-performing machine learning models. Signatures of overland flow provide a streamlined approach for characterizing and understanding post-fire overland flow, which is beneficial for watershed managers who must rapidly assess and mitigate the risk of post-fire hydrologic hazards after wildfire occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.15215","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-fire flooding and debris flows are often triggered by increased overland flow resulting from wildfire impacts on soil infiltration capacity and surface roughness. Increasing wildfire activity and intensification of precipitation with climate change make improving understanding of post-fire overland flow a particularly pertinent task. Hydrologic signatures, which are metrics that summarize the hydrologic regime of watersheds using rainfall and runoff time series, can be calculated for large samples of watersheds relatively easily to understand post-fire hydrologic processes. We demonstrate that signatures designed specifically for overland flow reflect changes to overland flow processes with wildfire that align with previous case studies on burned watersheds. For example, signatures suggest increases in infiltration-excess overland flow and decrease in saturation-excess overland flow in the first and second years after wildfire in the majority of watersheds examined. We show that climate, watershed and wildfire attributes can predict either post-fire signatures of overland flow or changes in signature values with wildfire using machine learning. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), air temperature, amount of developed/undeveloped land, soil thickness and clay content were the most used predictors by well-performing machine learning models. Signatures of overland flow provide a streamlined approach for characterizing and understanding post-fire overland flow, which is beneficial for watershed managers who must rapidly assess and mitigate the risk of post-fire hydrologic hazards after wildfire occurs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用水文特征方法分析野火对陆上水流的影响
火灾后的洪水和泥石流通常是由野火对土壤入渗能力和地表粗糙度的影响所导致的陆地流量增加引发的。随着气候变化,野火活动日益频繁,降水量也在不断增加,因此提高对火后陆地流的认识是一项尤为重要的任务。水文特征是利用降雨和径流时间序列总结流域水文机制的指标,可以相对容易地计算出大样本流域的水文特征,以了解火灾后的水文过程。我们证明,专为陆地流设计的特征反映了野火对陆地流过程造成的变化,这与之前有关烧毁流域的案例研究相吻合。例如,在所研究的大多数流域中,信号表明在野火发生后的第一年和第二年,入渗过量的陆地流增加,饱和过量的陆地流减少。我们的研究表明,利用机器学习,气候、流域和野火属性可以预测野火后陆地流的特征或特征值的变化。归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)、气温、已开发/未开发土地数量、土壤厚度和粘土含量是表现良好的机器学习模型最常用的预测因子。陆地流特征为描述和了解火灾后的陆地流提供了一种简化方法,有利于流域管理者在野火发生后迅速评估和减轻火灾后的水文危害风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
期刊最新文献
Field measurement of entrapped pore-air pressure and the effect of rising groundwater level in the soil layer Issue Information How do different runoff generation mechanisms drive stream network dynamics? Insights from physics-based modelling River–aquifer interactions enhancing evapotranspiration in a semiarid riparian zone: A modelling study Fill-spill-merge terrain analysis reveals topographical controls on Canadian river runoff
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1