Runoff from an extensive green roof during extreme events: Insights from 15 years of observations

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science Hydrological Processes Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1002/hyp.15220
Kim H. Paus, Bent C. Braskerud
{"title":"Runoff from an extensive green roof during extreme events: Insights from 15 years of observations","authors":"Kim H. Paus,&nbsp;Bent C. Braskerud","doi":"10.1002/hyp.15220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While green roofs have gained widespread popularity as a measure to detain and retain runoff in urban areas, their performance during extreme events is not well studied. In this study 15 years of runoff and precipitation observations from a small extensive green roof in Norway are analysed. GEV-distributions were fitted to the annual max values for precipitation and runoff in order to develop intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) and runoff-duration-frequency (RDF) data. Using the IDF and RDF data a total of 31 extreme events were identified (containing precipitation or runoff values with return period greater than 2 years for one or more durations). While nearly all extreme runoff events were caused by extreme precipitation, only 69% of the extreme precipitation events resulted in extreme runoff. The assumption of 1:1 equivalency of return periods did not hold true, and deviations were mainly explained by variations in substrate water content prior to the extreme event. Moreover, in 50% of the events, the runoff duration with the greatest return period was shorter than the precipitation duration with the greatest return period. Hence, the results indicate that the use of design storms to predict runoff from green roofs may be inappropriate. The potential of having IDF and RDF data available was demonstrated by the development of simple empirical equations, which ensure conservations of both return period and duration. To generate reliable green roof RDF data, future research should prioritize evaluating various continuous models with the aim of accurately describing extreme events.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.15220","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While green roofs have gained widespread popularity as a measure to detain and retain runoff in urban areas, their performance during extreme events is not well studied. In this study 15 years of runoff and precipitation observations from a small extensive green roof in Norway are analysed. GEV-distributions were fitted to the annual max values for precipitation and runoff in order to develop intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) and runoff-duration-frequency (RDF) data. Using the IDF and RDF data a total of 31 extreme events were identified (containing precipitation or runoff values with return period greater than 2 years for one or more durations). While nearly all extreme runoff events were caused by extreme precipitation, only 69% of the extreme precipitation events resulted in extreme runoff. The assumption of 1:1 equivalency of return periods did not hold true, and deviations were mainly explained by variations in substrate water content prior to the extreme event. Moreover, in 50% of the events, the runoff duration with the greatest return period was shorter than the precipitation duration with the greatest return period. Hence, the results indicate that the use of design storms to predict runoff from green roofs may be inappropriate. The potential of having IDF and RDF data available was demonstrated by the development of simple empirical equations, which ensure conservations of both return period and duration. To generate reliable green roof RDF data, future research should prioritize evaluating various continuous models with the aim of accurately describing extreme events.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极端事件期间大面积绿色屋顶的径流:15 年观测的启示
虽然屋顶绿化作为城市地区截留和保留径流的一种措施受到广泛欢迎,但对其在极端事件中的表现却没有进行深入研究。本研究分析了挪威一个小型大型绿色屋顶 15 年来的径流和降水观测数据。对降水量和径流量的年最大值进行了 GEV 分布拟合,以生成强度-持续时间-频率(IDF)和径流-持续时间-频率(RDF)数据。利用 IDF 和 RDF 数据,共确定了 31 个极端事件(包含一个或多个持续时间的回归期超过 2 年的降水或径流值)。虽然几乎所有的极端径流事件都是由极端降水引起的,但只有 69% 的极端降水事件导致了极端径流。回归期 1:1 等效的假设并不成立,偏差主要是由极端事件发生前底质含水量的变化造成的。此外,在 50%的事件中,重现期最长的径流持续时间短于重现期最长的降水持续时间。因此,结果表明,使用设计暴雨来预测绿色屋顶的径流可能并不合适。通过开发简单的经验方程,确保了对回归期和持续时间的保护,从而证明了拥有 IDF 和 RDF 数据的潜力。为了生成可靠的绿色屋顶 RDF 数据,未来的研究应优先评估各种连续模型,以准确描述极端事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
期刊最新文献
Field measurement of entrapped pore-air pressure and the effect of rising groundwater level in the soil layer Issue Information How do different runoff generation mechanisms drive stream network dynamics? Insights from physics-based modelling River–aquifer interactions enhancing evapotranspiration in a semiarid riparian zone: A modelling study Fill-spill-merge terrain analysis reveals topographical controls on Canadian river runoff
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1