A study of different machine learning algorithms for state of charge estimation in lithium-ion battery pack

Energy Storage Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1002/est2.658
Mangesh Maurya, Shashank Gawade, Neha Zope
{"title":"A study of different machine learning algorithms for state of charge estimation in lithium-ion battery pack","authors":"Mangesh Maurya,&nbsp;Shashank Gawade,&nbsp;Neha Zope","doi":"10.1002/est2.658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forecasting the state of charge (SOC) using battery control systems is laborious because of their longevity and reliability. Since battery degradation is typically nonlinear, predicting SOC estimation with significantly less degradation is laborious. So, the estimation of SOC is an increasingly major problem in ensuring the effectiveness and safety of the battery. To overcome these issues in SOC estimation, we found many methods in the scientific literature, with differing degrees of precision and intricacy. The SOC of lithium-ion batteries can now be precisely predicted using supervised learning approaches. Reliable assessment of the SOC of a battery ensures safe operation, extends battery lifespan, and optimizes system performance. This work compares and studies the performance, benefits, and drawbacks of five supervised learning techniques for SOC estimates. Different SOC estimate methods are discussed, including both conventional and contemporary methods. These consist of techniques using voltage and current measurements and more complex algorithms using electrochemical models, impedance spectroscopy, and machine learning methods, incorporating the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning for flexible SOC estimation. In the future, SOC estimates will be a crucial component of a larger ecosystem for energy management, allowing for the seamless integration of energy storage into smart grids and adopting more environmentally friendly energy habits. The five methods we compare are random forest RF, gradient boosting machines, extra tree regressor, XG Boost, and DT. In these five methods, we are going to investigate, review, and discuss the current algorithms and overcome them to select one of the most precise and accurate algorithms to predict the accurate estimation of lithium-ion battery SOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11765,"journal":{"name":"Energy Storage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Storage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/est2.658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forecasting the state of charge (SOC) using battery control systems is laborious because of their longevity and reliability. Since battery degradation is typically nonlinear, predicting SOC estimation with significantly less degradation is laborious. So, the estimation of SOC is an increasingly major problem in ensuring the effectiveness and safety of the battery. To overcome these issues in SOC estimation, we found many methods in the scientific literature, with differing degrees of precision and intricacy. The SOC of lithium-ion batteries can now be precisely predicted using supervised learning approaches. Reliable assessment of the SOC of a battery ensures safe operation, extends battery lifespan, and optimizes system performance. This work compares and studies the performance, benefits, and drawbacks of five supervised learning techniques for SOC estimates. Different SOC estimate methods are discussed, including both conventional and contemporary methods. These consist of techniques using voltage and current measurements and more complex algorithms using electrochemical models, impedance spectroscopy, and machine learning methods, incorporating the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning for flexible SOC estimation. In the future, SOC estimates will be a crucial component of a larger ecosystem for energy management, allowing for the seamless integration of energy storage into smart grids and adopting more environmentally friendly energy habits. The five methods we compare are random forest RF, gradient boosting machines, extra tree regressor, XG Boost, and DT. In these five methods, we are going to investigate, review, and discuss the current algorithms and overcome them to select one of the most precise and accurate algorithms to predict the accurate estimation of lithium-ion battery SOC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对锂离子电池组充电状态估计的不同机器学习算法研究
由于电池的寿命和可靠性,使用电池控制系统预测充电状态(SOC)非常费力。由于电池的衰减通常是非线性的,因此要预测衰减明显较小的 SOC 估计值十分费力。因此,在确保电池的有效性和安全性方面,SOC 估算日益成为一个重大问题。为了克服 SOC 估算中的这些问题,我们在科学文献中找到了许多方法,这些方法的精确度和复杂程度各不相同。现在,使用监督学习方法可以精确预测锂离子电池的 SOC。对电池 SOC 的可靠评估可确保安全运行、延长电池寿命并优化系统性能。本研究比较并研究了用于 SOC 评估的五种监督学习技术的性能、优点和缺点。文中讨论了不同的 SOC 估算方法,包括传统方法和现代方法。这些方法包括使用电压和电流测量的技术,以及使用电化学模型、阻抗光谱和机器学习方法的更复杂算法,并结合使用人工智能和机器学习来灵活估算 SOC。未来,SOC 估值将成为能源管理大型生态系统的重要组成部分,从而实现储能与智能电网的无缝集成,并养成更环保的用能习惯。我们比较的五种方法是随机森林 RF、梯度提升机、额外树回归器、XG Boost 和 DT。在这五种方法中,我们将对当前的算法进行研究、回顾和讨论,并对其进行克服,从而选择一种最精确、最准确的算法来预测锂离子电池 SOC 的准确估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Innovative Energy Storage System Based on Phase Change Material and Solar Energy Integrated With an Air Handling Unit to Produce Heating and Cooling Performance Analysis of a Renewable-Powered Multi-Gas Floating Storage and Regasification Facility for Ammonia Vessels With Reconversion to Hydrogen The Solid-State Battery Applicational Technology: Material Characteristics and Charge–Discharge Mechanisms of Iron Chloride Electrodes Hydrogen Storage Studies of Nanocomposites Derived From O-Ethyl-S-((5-Methoxy-1H-Benzo[d]Imidazol-2-Yl)Carbonothioate (OESMBIC) With ZnO and TiO2 Nanoparticles Performance Enhancement of Solar Still Couples With Solar Water Heater by Using Different PCM's and Nanoparticle Combinations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1