Role of policy and consumer attitudes in people’s intention to use autonomous vehicles: a comparative study in China and the USA

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1007/s11116-024-10508-2
Xinghua Li, Jieru Zou, Shubham Agrawal, Yuntao Guo, Tianpei Tang, Xi Feng
{"title":"Role of policy and consumer attitudes in people’s intention to use autonomous vehicles: a comparative study in China and the USA","authors":"Xinghua Li, Jieru Zou, Shubham Agrawal, Yuntao Guo, Tianpei Tang, Xi Feng","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10508-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The transition to autonomous vehicles (AVs) will likely vary across countries due to differences in technology advancements, infrastructure, cultural background, and policy. Managing this transition can be challenging, as similar policies may elicit different responses from relevant stakeholders, leading to either societal benefits from the technology or unintended consequences. This study explores the similarities and differences in the impacts of sociodemographic factors, attitudinal factors, and policy-related factors on AV adoption in two countries that are expected to be one of the early adopters: China and the United States. A theoretical framework was developed to examine these impacts, and Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes models were estimated using 2000 valid survey responses from each country. The model estimation results reveal that certain sociodemographic factors, such as education and income levels, similarly influence AV adoption intentions in both countries. However, other characteristics, like gender and the number of household vehicles, exhibit contrasting effects. Furthermore, attitudinal factors like attitude towards AVs, perceived usefulness, and perceived monetary value significantly impact AV adoption intentions among Chinese respondents, whereas perceived usefulness, perceived nonmonetary value, and subjective norms play a more prominent role in shaping AV adoption intentions among American respondents. In terms of policy impacts, individuals already inclined towards using AVs are more likely to strengthen their intention under all policies, with a more pronounced effect in China, where cultural and economic factors, along with stronger government support for technology, play a significant role.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10508-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition to autonomous vehicles (AVs) will likely vary across countries due to differences in technology advancements, infrastructure, cultural background, and policy. Managing this transition can be challenging, as similar policies may elicit different responses from relevant stakeholders, leading to either societal benefits from the technology or unintended consequences. This study explores the similarities and differences in the impacts of sociodemographic factors, attitudinal factors, and policy-related factors on AV adoption in two countries that are expected to be one of the early adopters: China and the United States. A theoretical framework was developed to examine these impacts, and Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes models were estimated using 2000 valid survey responses from each country. The model estimation results reveal that certain sociodemographic factors, such as education and income levels, similarly influence AV adoption intentions in both countries. However, other characteristics, like gender and the number of household vehicles, exhibit contrasting effects. Furthermore, attitudinal factors like attitude towards AVs, perceived usefulness, and perceived monetary value significantly impact AV adoption intentions among Chinese respondents, whereas perceived usefulness, perceived nonmonetary value, and subjective norms play a more prominent role in shaping AV adoption intentions among American respondents. In terms of policy impacts, individuals already inclined towards using AVs are more likely to strengthen their intention under all policies, with a more pronounced effect in China, where cultural and economic factors, along with stronger government support for technology, play a significant role.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策和消费者态度对人们使用自动驾驶汽车意愿的影响:中美比较研究
由于技术进步、基础设施、文化背景和政策的不同,各国向自动驾驶汽车(AVs)的过渡可能会有所不同。管理这种过渡可能具有挑战性,因为类似的政策可能会引起相关利益攸关方的不同反应,从而导致该技术要么给社会带来好处,要么产生意想不到的后果。本研究探讨了社会人口因素、态度因素和政策相关因素对 AV 应用的影响的异同:中国和美国。为了研究这些影响,我们建立了一个理论框架,并使用来自每个国家的 2000 份有效调查问卷估算了多指标和多原因模型。模型估计结果显示,某些社会人口因素,如教育和收入水平,同样影响着两国的 AV 采用意向。然而,其他特征,如性别和家庭车辆数量,则表现出截然不同的影响。此外,中国受访者对自动驾驶汽车的态度、感知有用性和感知货币价值等态度因素对自动驾驶汽车的采用意向有显著影响,而感知有用性、感知非货币价值和主观规范对美国受访者采用自动驾驶汽车的意向有更突出的影响。就政策影响而言,在所有政策下,已经倾向于使用自动驾驶汽车的个人更有可能加强他们的意向,而在中国,文化和经济因素以及政府对技术更有力的支持发挥了重要作用,其影响更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
期刊最新文献
From trips to stages: a methodology for Generating Stage Information in trip-level Household travel surveys Transit modal complementarity: measuring the access provided by transfers Multifunctional lightweight autonomous vehicles: an agent-based study Policy paradigms as an analytical concept in transport studies research Quantifying the impact of metrorail transport quality factors on overall user satisfaction: a Brazilian case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1