PRIORITI: Phase 4 study of triptorelin or active surveillance in high-risk prostate cancer.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1111/ajco.14101
Vsevolod Matveev, Xin Gao, Evgeny Kopyltsov, Jindan Luo, Qiang Wei, Dingwei Ye, Fangjian Zhou, Patrick Cabri, Aude Houchard, Adnan Mahmood, Li-Ping Xie
{"title":"PRIORITI: Phase 4 study of triptorelin or active surveillance in high-risk prostate cancer.","authors":"Vsevolod Matveev, Xin Gao, Evgeny Kopyltsov, Jindan Luo, Qiang Wei, Dingwei Ye, Fangjian Zhou, Patrick Cabri, Aude Houchard, Adnan Mahmood, Li-Ping Xie","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triptorelin after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with negative lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PRIORITI (NCT01753297) was a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, phase 4 study conducted in China and Russia. Patients with high-risk (Gleason score ≥ 8 and/or pre-RP prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 20 ng/mL and/or primary tumor stage 3a) prostate adenocarcinoma without evidence of lymph node or distant metastases were randomized to receive triptorelin 11.25 mg at baseline (≤ 8 weeks after RP) and at 3 and 6 months, or active surveillance. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), defined as the time from randomization to biochemical relapse (BR; increased PSA > 0.2 ng/mL). Patients were monitored every 3 months for at least 36 months; the study ended when 61 BRs were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intention-to-treat population comprised 226 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 65.3 [6.4] years), of whom 109 and 117 were randomized to triptorelin or surveillance, respectively. The median BRFS was not reached. The 25th percentile time to BRFS (95% confidence interval) was 39.1 (29.9-not estimated) months with triptorelin and 30.0 (18.6-42.1) months with surveillance (p = 0.16). There was evidence of a lower risk of BR with triptorelin versus surveillance but this was not statistically significant at the 5% level (p = 0.10). Chemical castration was maintained at month 9 in 93.9% of patients who had received triptorelin. Overall, triptorelin was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BRFS was observed to be longer with triptorelin than surveillance, but the difference was not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triptorelin after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with negative lymph nodes.

Methods: PRIORITI (NCT01753297) was a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, phase 4 study conducted in China and Russia. Patients with high-risk (Gleason score ≥ 8 and/or pre-RP prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 20 ng/mL and/or primary tumor stage 3a) prostate adenocarcinoma without evidence of lymph node or distant metastases were randomized to receive triptorelin 11.25 mg at baseline (≤ 8 weeks after RP) and at 3 and 6 months, or active surveillance. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), defined as the time from randomization to biochemical relapse (BR; increased PSA > 0.2 ng/mL). Patients were monitored every 3 months for at least 36 months; the study ended when 61 BRs were observed.

Results: The intention-to-treat population comprised 226 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 65.3 [6.4] years), of whom 109 and 117 were randomized to triptorelin or surveillance, respectively. The median BRFS was not reached. The 25th percentile time to BRFS (95% confidence interval) was 39.1 (29.9-not estimated) months with triptorelin and 30.0 (18.6-42.1) months with surveillance (p = 0.16). There was evidence of a lower risk of BR with triptorelin versus surveillance but this was not statistically significant at the 5% level (p = 0.10). Chemical castration was maintained at month 9 in 93.9% of patients who had received triptorelin. Overall, triptorelin was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile.

Conclusion: BRFS was observed to be longer with triptorelin than surveillance, but the difference was not statistically significant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PRIORITI:对高危前列腺癌进行三苯氧胺或积极监控的 4 期研究。
目的:评估淋巴结阴性前列腺癌根治术(RP)后使用曲普瑞林的有效性和安全性:PRIORITI(NCT01753297)是一项在中国和俄罗斯进行的前瞻性、开放标签、随机对照 4 期研究。高危(Gleason评分≥8和/或RP前前列腺特异性抗原[PSA]≥20纳克/毫升和/或原发肿瘤3a期)前列腺腺癌且无淋巴结或远处转移证据的患者被随机分配至基线(RP后≤8周)及3个月和6个月时接受曲普瑞林11.25毫克治疗,或接受主动监测。主要终点是无生化复发生存期(BRFS),即从随机化到生化复发(BR;PSA 增高 > 0.2 纳克/毫升)的时间。在至少 36 个月的时间里,每 3 个月对患者进行一次监测;当观察到 61 次生化无复发时,研究结束:意向治疗人群包括226名患者(平均[标准差]年龄为65.3[6.4]岁),其中109人和117人分别随机接受三苯氧胺治疗或监测。未达到中位 BRFS。接受曲普瑞林治疗的患者 BRFS 第 25 百分位数时间(95% 置信区间)为 39.1 个月(29.9 个月,未估算),接受监测的患者 BRFS 第 25 百分位数时间为 30.0 个月(18.6-42.1 个月)(P = 0.16)。有证据表明,使用曲普瑞林与监测相比,BR 的风险更低,但在 5%的水平上并无统计学意义(p = 0.10)。在接受曲普瑞林治疗的患者中,93.9%的患者在第9个月继续接受化学阉割治疗。总体而言,曲普瑞林的耐受性良好,安全性也可接受:结论:与监视治疗相比,使用曲普瑞林的患者的两年生存期更长,但差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
The clinical utility of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination for patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue Information Different characteristics of the tumor immune microenvironment among subtypes of salivary gland cancer. Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with donafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Adherence to guidelines in curative treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: Insights from a retrospective Tunisian study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1