Potential barriers to the rational antibiotic use in dental and periodontal practice: A questionnaire-based online survey.

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental and Medical Problems Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.17219/dmp/159490
Meltem Özdemir Kabalak, Ege Nadir Aytac, Nermin Tarhan, Erdem Karabulut, Hüseyin Gencay Keceli
{"title":"Potential barriers to the rational antibiotic use in dental and periodontal practice: A questionnaire-based online survey.","authors":"Meltem Özdemir Kabalak, Ege Nadir Aytac, Nermin Tarhan, Erdem Karabulut, Hüseyin Gencay Keceli","doi":"10.17219/dmp/159490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dentists, through inappropriate antibiotic prescription, may contribute to the global problem of antibiotic resistance (AR).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Understanding dentists' antibiotic prescription patterns, source of knowledge, and the driving forces behind their prescription practices may be crucial for the effective implementation of the rational use of antibiotics (RUA) in dentistry.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Active members of the Turkish Dental Association were invited to participate in an electronic survey comprising questions focusing on their role, knowledge and perceptions regarding RUA, the perceived barriers to adapting RUA in daily dental work, and the actual antibiotic prescription practices. The potential impact of age, gender, professional experience, and the mode of dental practice was also evaluated. Dentists' prescription practices for periodontal disease/conditions were evaluated as well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 1,005 valid responses, there was consensus on the necessity of RUA (99.1%); however, its implementation was low. The main barriers were dentists' own safety concerns (74.4%), strong patients' demands (42.2%) and the fact that prescribing antibiotics became a professional habit (35.8%). Different educational background resulted in clear variances in everyday prescription practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of RUA was not sufficient and the perceived barriers had an impact on daily prescribing habits. Support for dental professionals through the efficient dissemination of evidencebased clinical guidelines and decision-making aids is likely to require additional help from professional organizations in order to actively combat AR.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/159490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dentists, through inappropriate antibiotic prescription, may contribute to the global problem of antibiotic resistance (AR).

Objectives: Understanding dentists' antibiotic prescription patterns, source of knowledge, and the driving forces behind their prescription practices may be crucial for the effective implementation of the rational use of antibiotics (RUA) in dentistry.

Material and methods: Active members of the Turkish Dental Association were invited to participate in an electronic survey comprising questions focusing on their role, knowledge and perceptions regarding RUA, the perceived barriers to adapting RUA in daily dental work, and the actual antibiotic prescription practices. The potential impact of age, gender, professional experience, and the mode of dental practice was also evaluated. Dentists' prescription practices for periodontal disease/conditions were evaluated as well.

Results: Based on 1,005 valid responses, there was consensus on the necessity of RUA (99.1%); however, its implementation was low. The main barriers were dentists' own safety concerns (74.4%), strong patients' demands (42.2%) and the fact that prescribing antibiotics became a professional habit (35.8%). Different educational background resulted in clear variances in everyday prescription practices.

Conclusions: The implementation of RUA was not sufficient and the perceived barriers had an impact on daily prescribing habits. Support for dental professionals through the efficient dissemination of evidencebased clinical guidelines and decision-making aids is likely to require additional help from professional organizations in order to actively combat AR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙科和牙周治疗中合理使用抗生素的潜在障碍:基于问卷的在线调查。
背景:牙科医生通过开具不恰当的抗生素处方,可能会导致全球抗生素耐药性(AR)问题:目的:了解牙科医生的抗生素处方模式、知识来源及其处方做法背后的驱动力,对于在牙科领域有效实施合理使用抗生素(RUA)至关重要:邀请土耳其牙科协会的活跃成员参与一项电子调查,调查问题包括他们的角色、对合理使用抗生素的认识和看法、在日常牙科工作中采用合理使用抗生素的障碍以及实际的抗生素处方做法。此外,还评估了年龄、性别、专业经验和牙医执业模式的潜在影响。此外,还对牙医针对牙周疾病/病症的处方做法进行了评估:结果:根据 1 005 份有效答卷,对 RUA 的必要性达成了共识(99.1%),但其实施率较低。主要障碍是牙医对自身安全的担忧(74.4%)、患者的强烈要求(42.2%)以及处方抗生素已成为一种职业习惯(35.8%)。不同的教育背景导致日常处方做法存在明显差异:结论:RUA 的实施还不够充分,所感知到的障碍对日常处方习惯有影响。通过有效传播循证临床指南和决策辅助工具为牙科专业人员提供支持,可能需要专业组织提供更多帮助,以积极防治AR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Most common congenital syndromes with facial asymmetry: A narrative review. Self-assessment skills of undergraduate students in operative dentistry: Preclinical performance and gender. Optical properties of advanced lithium disilicate. Studies on the content of toxic metals in teeth: A narrative review of literature. Kinesio Taping as an alternative therapy for limited mandibular mobility with pain in female patients with temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1