Tracking Missing Deaths: An Exploratory Study on the Mortality Impact of COVID-19 in Kozhikode City, India.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Indian journal of public health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-29 DOI:10.4103/ijph.ijph_1333_23
Shilka Abraham, Soumitra Ghosh
{"title":"Tracking Missing Deaths: An Exploratory Study on the Mortality Impact of COVID-19 in Kozhikode City, India.","authors":"Shilka Abraham, Soumitra Ghosh","doi":"10.4103/ijph.ijph_1333_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The debate over the extent of the mortality impact of COVID-19 in India is still unsettled.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This article contributes to the debate, seeking to explore the true mortality impact of the pandemic, by answering four interrelated questions. First, is there any discrepancy between recorded and actual death count? Second, if so, how large it is? Third, what is the extent of misclassification of COVID-19 mortality, and fourth, what is the magnitude of deaths that could be indirectly linked to COVID-19?</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To answer the questions, we explored three sources of data-all-cause mortality data from the civil registration system, records maintained at the burial grounds/cemeteries and crematoriums, and a household survey. The data collection period was between August 2021 and November 2021. The instrument used for data collection of verbal autopsies was built on the instrument proposed by the World Health Organization for adult mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that deaths due to various causes including COVID-19 increased considerably at some points in 2020-2021 compared to the base year 2019 in the study setting. Notably, 5.5% of the noninstitutional deaths were unreported at the time of the survey and many deaths were plausibly misclassified, leading to undercounting of COVID-19 deaths. Overall, about half of our sampled deaths (48%) had either direct or indirect attribution to the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The extent of undercounting of pandemic-related deaths is likely to be either similar or worse in other states. To get reliable state and national estimates, policymakers should conduct a large-scale study.</p>","PeriodicalId":13298,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of public health","volume":"68 2","pages":"227-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_1333_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The debate over the extent of the mortality impact of COVID-19 in India is still unsettled.

Objectives: This article contributes to the debate, seeking to explore the true mortality impact of the pandemic, by answering four interrelated questions. First, is there any discrepancy between recorded and actual death count? Second, if so, how large it is? Third, what is the extent of misclassification of COVID-19 mortality, and fourth, what is the magnitude of deaths that could be indirectly linked to COVID-19?

Materials and methods: To answer the questions, we explored three sources of data-all-cause mortality data from the civil registration system, records maintained at the burial grounds/cemeteries and crematoriums, and a household survey. The data collection period was between August 2021 and November 2021. The instrument used for data collection of verbal autopsies was built on the instrument proposed by the World Health Organization for adult mortality.

Results: The results revealed that deaths due to various causes including COVID-19 increased considerably at some points in 2020-2021 compared to the base year 2019 in the study setting. Notably, 5.5% of the noninstitutional deaths were unreported at the time of the survey and many deaths were plausibly misclassified, leading to undercounting of COVID-19 deaths. Overall, about half of our sampled deaths (48%) had either direct or indirect attribution to the pandemic.

Conclusion: The extent of undercounting of pandemic-related deaths is likely to be either similar or worse in other states. To get reliable state and national estimates, policymakers should conduct a large-scale study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
追踪失踪死亡:印度科济科德市 COVID-19 对死亡率影响的探索性研究》。
背景:关于 COVID-19 对印度死亡率影响程度的争论仍悬而未决:本文试图通过回答四个相互关联的问题来探讨该流行病对死亡率的真正影响,从而为这一争论做出贡献。首先,记录的死亡人数与实际死亡人数之间是否存在差异?第二,如果有,差异有多大?第三,COVID-19 死亡率的错误分类程度如何?第四,可能与 COVID-19 间接相关的死亡人数有多少?为了回答这些问题,我们研究了三个数据来源--民事登记系统中的全因死亡率数据、墓地/公墓和火葬场的记录以及家庭调查。数据收集期为 2021 年 8 月至 2021 年 11 月。用于收集口述尸体解剖数据的工具是根据世界卫生组织提出的成人死亡率工具设计的:结果显示,在研究环境中,2020-2021 年期间,包括 COVID-19 在内的各种原因导致的死亡人数与基准年 2019 年相比在某些时间点大幅增加。值得注意的是,5.5% 的非机构死亡病例在调查时没有报告,许多死亡病例可能被错误分类,导致 COVID-19 死亡病例计算不足。总体而言,我们抽样调查的死亡病例中约有一半(48%)直接或间接归因于大流行:结论:在其他州,与大流行相关的死亡人数被低估的程度可能与此类似或更严重。为了获得可靠的州和全国估计数字,决策者应该开展大规模研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of public health
Indian journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Public Health is a peer-reviewed international journal published Quarterly by the Indian Public Health Association. It is indexed / abstracted by the major international indexing systems like Index Medicus/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PUBMED, etc. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles. The Indian Journal of Public Health publishes articles of authors from India and abroad with special emphasis on original research findings that are relevant for developing country perspectives including India. The journal considers publication of articles as original article, review article, special article, brief research article, CME / Education forum, commentary, letters to editor, case series reports, etc. The journal covers population based studies, impact assessment, monitoring and evaluation, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinic-social studies etc., related to any domain and discipline of public health, specially relevant to national priorities, including ethical and social issues. Articles aligned with national health issues and policy implications are prefered.
期刊最新文献
Severe Pneumonia and Cytomegalovirus Coinfection in Infants with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. Social and Cultural Influences on Genetic Counseling Acceptability: A Mixed-Methods Study on Beta-Thalassemia Carriers Among Graduate Students in West Bengal, India. Time to Revisit COTPA as Herbs Become Perilous. Training Needs Assessment Should Be Introduced as a Competency for Postgraduate Training in Community Medicine in India. "Fit India Movement" Promotes WHO's Physical Activity Recommendations: Some Issues to Consider.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1