Assessing the combination efficiency of some unconventional feed resources with concentrates and Chloris gayana grass in mitigating ruminal methane production in vitro
Aberra Melesse, Herbert Steingass, Julia Holstein, Natascha Titze, Markus Rodehutscord
{"title":"Assessing the combination efficiency of some unconventional feed resources with concentrates and Chloris gayana grass in mitigating ruminal methane production in vitro","authors":"Aberra Melesse, Herbert Steingass, Julia Holstein, Natascha Titze, Markus Rodehutscord","doi":"10.1111/jpn.14015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a preliminary in vitro study, leaves of <i>Acacia nilotica</i>, <i>Prosopis juliflora</i>, <i>Cajanus cajan</i>, <i>Leucaena leucocephala</i> and seed kernel of <i>Mangifera indica</i> were identified as potential candidates in mitigating ruminal methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) production. The objective of the current study was to investigate the combination efficiency of these unconventional feeds with concentrate mix (CM) or <i>Chloris gayana</i> grass in CH<sub>4</sub> reduction. Two feed combinations in different proportions were incubated in vitro with buffered rumen fluid at Hohenheim Gas test. In combination 1, <i>C. gayana</i> and CM were included as basal substrates, while in combination 2, <i>A. nilotica</i>, <i>P. juliflora</i>, <i>C. cajan</i>, <i>L. leucocephala</i> or <i>M. indica</i> seed kernel were included as CH<sub>4</sub> reducing supplements at different proportions. The CH<sub>4</sub> reducing potentials of feed combinations were presented as the ratio of CH<sub>4</sub> to net gas production and expressed as percentage (pCH<sub>4</sub>). The pCH<sub>4</sub> for CM and <i>C. gayana</i> was 16.7% and 16.9%, respectively, while it ranged from 3.18% in <i>A. nilotica</i> to 13.1% in <i>C. cajan</i>. The pCH<sub>4</sub> was reduced (<i>p</i> < 0.05) from 14.6% to 9.39% when <i>A. nilotica</i> was combined with CM. In combination of <i>L. leucocephala</i> or <i>C. cajan</i> with CM, the pCH<sub>4</sub> (<i>p</i> < 0.05) was reduced from 16.5% and 16.6% with the lowest proportion to 15.1% and 15.2% with the highest inclusion rate respectively. The combination of <i>C. gayana</i> with <i>L. leucocephala</i> or <i>C. cajan</i> reduced (<i>p</i> < 0.05) the pCH<sub>4</sub> from 16.3% and 16.4% to 15.1% and 14.9% respectively. The pCH<sub>4</sub> was reduced (<i>p</i> < 0.05) from 13.4% to 7.60% when <i>A. nilotica</i> was combined with <i>C. gayana</i>. Estimated digestible organic matter (dOM) and metabolizable energy (ME) increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with increasing proportions of <i>M. indica</i> seed kernel with CM or <i>C. gayana</i>. In conclusion, the combination of the basal substrates with unconventional supplements resulted in CH<sub>4</sub> reduction without affecting the dOM and ME at lower inclusion rates. Animal-based experiments await to validate in vitro findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","volume":"108 6","pages":"1761-1770"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpn.14015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpn.14015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In a preliminary in vitro study, leaves of Acacia nilotica, Prosopis juliflora, Cajanus cajan, Leucaena leucocephala and seed kernel of Mangifera indica were identified as potential candidates in mitigating ruminal methane (CH4) production. The objective of the current study was to investigate the combination efficiency of these unconventional feeds with concentrate mix (CM) or Chloris gayana grass in CH4 reduction. Two feed combinations in different proportions were incubated in vitro with buffered rumen fluid at Hohenheim Gas test. In combination 1, C. gayana and CM were included as basal substrates, while in combination 2, A. nilotica, P. juliflora, C. cajan, L. leucocephala or M. indica seed kernel were included as CH4 reducing supplements at different proportions. The CH4 reducing potentials of feed combinations were presented as the ratio of CH4 to net gas production and expressed as percentage (pCH4). The pCH4 for CM and C. gayana was 16.7% and 16.9%, respectively, while it ranged from 3.18% in A. nilotica to 13.1% in C. cajan. The pCH4 was reduced (p < 0.05) from 14.6% to 9.39% when A. nilotica was combined with CM. In combination of L. leucocephala or C. cajan with CM, the pCH4 (p < 0.05) was reduced from 16.5% and 16.6% with the lowest proportion to 15.1% and 15.2% with the highest inclusion rate respectively. The combination of C. gayana with L. leucocephala or C. cajan reduced (p < 0.05) the pCH4 from 16.3% and 16.4% to 15.1% and 14.9% respectively. The pCH4 was reduced (p < 0.05) from 13.4% to 7.60% when A. nilotica was combined with C. gayana. Estimated digestible organic matter (dOM) and metabolizable energy (ME) increased (p < 0.05) with increasing proportions of M. indica seed kernel with CM or C. gayana. In conclusion, the combination of the basal substrates with unconventional supplements resulted in CH4 reduction without affecting the dOM and ME at lower inclusion rates. Animal-based experiments await to validate in vitro findings.
期刊介绍:
As an international forum for hypothesis-driven scientific research, the Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition publishes original papers in the fields of animal physiology, biochemistry and physiology of nutrition, animal nutrition, feed technology and preservation (only when related to animal nutrition). Well-conducted scientific work that meets the technical and ethical standards is considered only on the basis of scientific rigor.
Research on farm and companion animals is preferred. Comparative work on exotic species is welcome too. Pharmacological or toxicological experiments with a direct reference to nutrition are also considered. Manuscripts on fish and other aquatic non-mammals with topics on growth or nutrition will not be accepted. Manuscripts may be rejected on the grounds that the subject is too specialized or that the contribution they make to animal physiology and nutrition is insufficient.
In addition, reviews on topics of current interest within the scope of the journal are welcome. Authors are advised to send an outline to the Editorial Office for approval prior to submission.