Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short- and long-term outcomes: a meta-analysis of 6 randomised control trials.

Abstract

Endovascular Thrombectomy (EVT) as first-line treatment of patients with large core ischemic infarct is a subject of debate. A systematic literature search was conducted in four electronic databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing EVT to best medical treatment (BMT) for large core infarcts (ASPECTS ≤ 5). Relevant studies were added after screening for titles, abstracts, and complete text. Meta-analysis was performed. The continuous outcomes were analyzed using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI, while the binary outcomes were analyzed using the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A funnel plot was used to visually evaluate publication bias, and if feasible, Egger's test was used to validate. We included 1918 patients from six RCTs that compared EVT plus BMT and BMT alone in patients with large core infarct due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. There were 946 patients in the EVT group and 972 patients in the BMT group. The one-year outcomes are available for 314 patients in the EVT group and 292 patents in the BMT group from two RCTs. EVT group had statistically significant higher rate of 90-day mRS 0-1 (RR = 3.1, P-value < 0.0001), mRS 0-2 (RR = 2.64, P-value < 0.0001), mRS 0-3 (RR = 1.80, P-value < 0.0001), lower 90-day mean mRS score (SMD = -0.29, P-value < 0.0001), lower 90-day mortality rate (RR = 0.85, P-value = 0.015), and greater early neurological improvement (RR = 2.16, P-value < 0.00001) compared to the BMT group. However, the rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) (RR = 1.76, P-value = 0.01) and any ICH (RR = 2.18, P-value < 0.00001) were higher in EVT group. Our finding showed that EVT plus BMT led to in an absolute improvement of 5%, 12%, and 16% in 90-day mRS 0-1, 0-2, and 0-3, respectively. In addition, patients in EVT plus BMT group had a 3% increased probability of experiencing sICH and were 32% more susceptible to any ICH. Moreover, the one-year mRS 0-2 (RR = 2.16, P-value < 0.00001) and mRS 0-3 (RR = 1.80, P-value < 0.0001) was significantly favor the EVT plus BMT over BMT alone. Although, the one-year mortality rate was not significantly differed between two groups (RR = 0.91, P-value = 0.31). There was no statistically significant difference observed between the EVT plus BMT group and the BMT group concerning new stroke, decompressive craniectomy, and serious adverse events. Combined data from six RCTs shows that EVT plus BMT provides significantly better short- and long-term functional outcomes with minimal increase in symptomatic hemorrhage over BMT in patient with large core infarcts.