Predicting functional movement capacity in adults: the effect of range of motion and isometric strength.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1186/s13102-024-00935-0
Mazhar Özkan, Umut Canli, Reem Alwhaibi, Kübra Ustaömer, Aydın Karaçam, Bekir Erhan Orhan, Lucimere Bohn, Kenan Sivrikaya, Aytekin Sönmeyenmakas, Pablo Prieto Gonzalez
{"title":"Predicting functional movement capacity in adults: the effect of range of motion and isometric strength.","authors":"Mazhar Özkan, Umut Canli, Reem Alwhaibi, Kübra Ustaömer, Aydın Karaçam, Bekir Erhan Orhan, Lucimere Bohn, Kenan Sivrikaya, Aytekin Sönmeyenmakas, Pablo Prieto Gonzalez","doi":"10.1186/s13102-024-00935-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to determine the role of isometric strength and range of motion in predicting Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores of adults. A total of 120 participants (age = 34.62 ± 11.82 years; height = 170.56 ± 9.63 cm; weight = 73.62 ± 15.39 kg) volunteered to participate in the study. Anthropometric measurements were performed, including height, body weight, muscle mass, and body fat. Following this, the ranges of motion of the shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle joints were measured sequentially. Isometric strength and FMS tests were then performed. Hip extension isometric strength explained 23% of the variation in FMS<sub>total</sub>. The common effect of knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion joint range of motion explained 34% of the change in FMS<sub>total</sub> (F <sub>(3-116)</sub> = 20.375, p < 0.001). A significant relationship (R = 0.658, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.413) was found between hip extension isometric strength, knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion range of motion and FMS<sub>total</sub> (F <sub>(4-115)</sub> = 21.952, p < 0.001). The common effect of all these variables explains 43% of the change in FMS<sub>total</sub>. The results indicate that the FMS test scores, which are utilized to evaluate the risk of injury in sedentary adults, can be significantly predicted by the effect of hip extension isometric strength and parameters related to knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion joint range of motion. At this time, it is advised that range of motion and isometric strength be taken into account when determining a person's functional movement capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"16 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00935-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the role of isometric strength and range of motion in predicting Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores of adults. A total of 120 participants (age = 34.62 ± 11.82 years; height = 170.56 ± 9.63 cm; weight = 73.62 ± 15.39 kg) volunteered to participate in the study. Anthropometric measurements were performed, including height, body weight, muscle mass, and body fat. Following this, the ranges of motion of the shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle joints were measured sequentially. Isometric strength and FMS tests were then performed. Hip extension isometric strength explained 23% of the variation in FMStotal. The common effect of knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion joint range of motion explained 34% of the change in FMStotal (F (3-116) = 20.375, p < 0.001). A significant relationship (R = 0.658, R2 = 0.413) was found between hip extension isometric strength, knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion range of motion and FMStotal (F (4-115) = 21.952, p < 0.001). The common effect of all these variables explains 43% of the change in FMStotal. The results indicate that the FMS test scores, which are utilized to evaluate the risk of injury in sedentary adults, can be significantly predicted by the effect of hip extension isometric strength and parameters related to knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion joint range of motion. At this time, it is advised that range of motion and isometric strength be taken into account when determining a person's functional movement capacity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测成人的功能性运动能力:运动范围和等长力量的影响。
本研究旨在确定等长肌力和运动范围在预测成人功能性运动筛查(FMS)得分中的作用。共有 120 名参与者(年龄 = 34.62 ± 11.82 岁;身高 = 170.56 ± 9.63 厘米;体重 = 73.62 ± 15.39 千克)自愿参与研究。研究人员对受试者进行了人体测量,包括身高、体重、肌肉质量和体脂。随后,依次测量了肩关节、髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的活动范围。然后进行等长力量和 FMS 测试。伸髋等长力量解释了 23% 的 FMStotal 变异。在伸髋等长力量、膝关节屈曲、肩关节屈曲和背伸关节活动范围与 FMStotal 之间发现,膝关节屈曲、肩关节屈曲和背伸关节活动范围的共同效应可解释 34% 的 FMStotal 变化(F(3-116)= 20.375,p 2 = 0.413)(F(4-115)= 21.952,p 总计)。结果表明,用于评估久坐成年人受伤风险的 FMS 测试得分可以通过伸髋等长力量以及膝关节屈曲、肩关节屈曲和背伸关节活动范围相关参数的影响得到显著预测。目前,建议在确定一个人的功能性运动能力时将运动范围和等长力量考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
期刊最新文献
The arch myth: investigating the impact of flat foot on vertical jump height: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sprint and jump performance are determined by localized BIA - an ecological study in track and field adolescent athletes. The effects of combined exercises, short foot exercises, and short foot exercises with isometric hip abduction on navicular drop, static parameters, and postural sway in women with flat foot: A randomized trial. Associations between body mass index and physical fitness indicators among Chinese university students: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Self-assessed performance-based function test versus patient-reported outcome measures for knee and hip osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1