Healthcare Students' Experiences of Learner-Educator Cocreation of Virtual Simulations: A Phenomenographic Study.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000806
Laura A Killam, Gerlese S Åkerlind, Mercedes Lock, Pilar Camargo-Plazas, Marian Luctkar-Flude
{"title":"Healthcare Students' Experiences of Learner-Educator Cocreation of Virtual Simulations: A Phenomenographic Study.","authors":"Laura A Killam, Gerlese S Åkerlind, Mercedes Lock, Pilar Camargo-Plazas, Marian Luctkar-Flude","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cocreating virtual simulations with learners during a course is an innovative approach to improving student preparation for real-world practice while helping simulationists meet learner needs, support authentic assessment, and maximize the impact of simulation-based learning. This study explores differences in healthcare students' experiences of learner-educator cocreation of virtual simulations (LECoVSs) using phenomenographic methods. Identifying differences in perceptions of LECoVSs enables educators to make evidence-informed decisions about engaging in simulation cocreation as a tool to maximize learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phenomenography focuses on identifying different ways that participants can experience the same phenomenon, in this case, LECoVSs. The setting was a collaborative interprofessional simulation assignment between navigation and nursing students. Participants completed a demographic survey then submitted reflective journals completed during the course and/or an open-ended survey. Data analysis occurred in iterative stages, from familiarization with the data to grouping and interpreting themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen open-ended surveys and 13 reflective journals from navigation and nursing students who completed the simulation assignment between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. Students experienced LECoVSs in 4 increasingly complex ways: (1) supporting consistent student progress, (2) amending course expectations, (3) sharing decision-making, and (4) fostering mutual growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulationists may leverage cocreation to improve student learning, access, empowerment, and professional growth. However, for students to achieve higher learning outcomes, educators need to clearly communicate the full potential of cocreation, how it can occur, and why it can support learning. This study's findings may be used as a framework for explaining simulation cocreation to students to maximize their learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"205-212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000806","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cocreating virtual simulations with learners during a course is an innovative approach to improving student preparation for real-world practice while helping simulationists meet learner needs, support authentic assessment, and maximize the impact of simulation-based learning. This study explores differences in healthcare students' experiences of learner-educator cocreation of virtual simulations (LECoVSs) using phenomenographic methods. Identifying differences in perceptions of LECoVSs enables educators to make evidence-informed decisions about engaging in simulation cocreation as a tool to maximize learning.

Methods: Phenomenography focuses on identifying different ways that participants can experience the same phenomenon, in this case, LECoVSs. The setting was a collaborative interprofessional simulation assignment between navigation and nursing students. Participants completed a demographic survey then submitted reflective journals completed during the course and/or an open-ended survey. Data analysis occurred in iterative stages, from familiarization with the data to grouping and interpreting themes.

Results: Nineteen open-ended surveys and 13 reflective journals from navigation and nursing students who completed the simulation assignment between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. Students experienced LECoVSs in 4 increasingly complex ways: (1) supporting consistent student progress, (2) amending course expectations, (3) sharing decision-making, and (4) fostering mutual growth.

Conclusions: Simulationists may leverage cocreation to improve student learning, access, empowerment, and professional growth. However, for students to achieve higher learning outcomes, educators need to clearly communicate the full potential of cocreation, how it can occur, and why it can support learning. This study's findings may be used as a framework for explaining simulation cocreation to students to maximize their learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健专业学生对虚拟仿真中学习者与教育者共同创作的体验:现象学研究。
导言:在课程中与学习者共同创建虚拟仿真是一种创新的方法,可以提高学生为真实世界实践做准备的能力,同时帮助仿真师满足学习者的需求,支持真实的评估,并最大限度地提高基于仿真的学习效果。本研究采用现象学方法探讨了医疗保健专业学生在学习者-教育者共同创建虚拟仿真(LECoVSs)过程中的体验差异。找出学生对 LECoVSs 感知的差异,可帮助教育者做出有据可依的决策,将模拟共创作为最大化学习的工具:方法:现象学侧重于确定参与者体验同一现象的不同方式,在本案例中即 LECoVS。环境是导航和护理专业学生之间的跨专业合作模拟任务。参与者填写了一份人口统计学调查,然后提交了在课程期间完成的反思日记和/或开放式调查。从熟悉数据到分组和解释主题,数据分析在各个阶段反复进行:对 19 份开放式调查和 13 篇反思日志进行了分析,这些数据来自 2021 年至 2023 年期间完成模拟任务的导航和护理专业学生。学生以 4 种日益复杂的方式体验了 LECoVS:(1)支持学生取得一致进步;(2)修正课程预期;(3)分享决策;(4)促进共同成长:结论:模拟学家可以利用共同创造来改善学生的学习、获取、授权和专业成长。然而,为了让学生取得更高的学习成绩,教育工作者需要清楚地传达共同创造的全部潜力、如何实现共同创造以及为什么共同创造可以支持学习。本研究的结果可作为向学生解释模拟共创的框架,以最大限度地提高他们的学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Cue Detection and Self-Debriefing Techniques in Virtual Simulation: Techniques Using Cognitive Engineering Inspired Expertise Development Approaches. An Educational Escape Room's Influence on Physical Therapy Students' Perception of Clinical Reasoning Development: A Qualitative Study. Development and Validation of a Novel, User-Friendly Simulation Phantom for Ultrasound-Guided Transvaginal Pelvic Abscess Drainage. Healthcare Students' Experiences of Learner-Educator Cocreation of Virtual Simulations: A Phenomenographic Study: Erratum. Achieving Reliable Mastery of Emergency Airway Management Skills Through 4-Component Instructional Design: A Mixed Methods Pilot Evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1