Health care safety incidents in paediatric emergency care

{"title":"Health care safety incidents in paediatric emergency care","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.anpede.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To characterize safety incidents in paediatric emergency departments (PEDs): frequency, sources, root causes, and consequences.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study in the PED of the Clinical University Hospital XX (blinded for review). Patients were recruited through opportunity sampling and the data were collected during care delivery and one week later through a telephone survey. The methodology was based on the ERIDA study on patient safety incidents related to emergency care, which in turn was based on the ENEAS and EVADUR studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included a total of 204 cases. At least one incident was detected in 25 cases, with two incidents detected in 3 cases, for a total incidence of 12.3%. Twelve incidents were detected during care delivery and the rest during the telephone call. Ten percent did not reach the patient, 7.1% reached the patient but caused no harm, and 82.1% reached the patient and caused harm. Thirteen incidents (46.4%) did not have an impact on care delivery, 8 (28.6%) required a new visit or referral, 6 (21.4%) required additional observation and 1 (3.6%) medical or surgical treatment. The most frequent root causes were health care delivery and medication. Incidents related to procedures and medication were most frequent. Of all incidents, 78.6% were considered preventable, with 50% identified as clear failures in health care delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Safety incidents affected 12.3% of children managed in the PED of the HCUVA, of which 78.6% were preventable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93868,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":"101 1","pages":"Pages 14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341287924001704/pdfft?md5=59c55227b2d8811fff0ee44e4f902518&pid=1-s2.0-S2341287924001704-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341287924001704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To characterize safety incidents in paediatric emergency departments (PEDs): frequency, sources, root causes, and consequences.

Materials and methods

We conducted a cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study in the PED of the Clinical University Hospital XX (blinded for review). Patients were recruited through opportunity sampling and the data were collected during care delivery and one week later through a telephone survey. The methodology was based on the ERIDA study on patient safety incidents related to emergency care, which in turn was based on the ENEAS and EVADUR studies.

Results

The study included a total of 204 cases. At least one incident was detected in 25 cases, with two incidents detected in 3 cases, for a total incidence of 12.3%. Twelve incidents were detected during care delivery and the rest during the telephone call. Ten percent did not reach the patient, 7.1% reached the patient but caused no harm, and 82.1% reached the patient and caused harm. Thirteen incidents (46.4%) did not have an impact on care delivery, 8 (28.6%) required a new visit or referral, 6 (21.4%) required additional observation and 1 (3.6%) medical or surgical treatment. The most frequent root causes were health care delivery and medication. Incidents related to procedures and medication were most frequent. Of all incidents, 78.6% were considered preventable, with 50% identified as clear failures in health care delivery.

Conclusions

Safety incidents affected 12.3% of children managed in the PED of the HCUVA, of which 78.6% were preventable.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科急诊中的医疗安全事故。
目的描述儿科急诊室(PED)安全事故的特点:频率、来源、根本原因和后果:我们在 XX 临床大学医院的儿科急诊室开展了一项横断面、观察性和描述性研究(盲审)。通过机会抽样招募患者,在护理过程中和一周后通过电话调查收集数据。研究方法以ERIDA急诊患者安全事件研究为基础,而ERIDA研究又以ENEAS和EVADUR研究为基础:研究共包括 204 个病例。其中 25 例至少发现一起事故,3 例发现两起事故,总发生率为 12.3%。其中 12 起是在护理过程中发现的,其余是在电话呼叫过程中发现的。10%的事件未发生在患者身上,7.1%的事件发生在患者身上但未造成伤害,82.1%的事件发生在患者身上但造成了伤害。13起事件(46.4%)未对护理服务造成影响,8起(28.6%)需要重新就诊或转诊,6起(21.4%)需要额外观察,1起(3.6%)需要内科或外科治疗。最常见的根本原因是医疗服务和用药。与手术和用药有关的事故最为常见。在所有事故中,78.6%被认为是可以预防的,其中50%被认为是医疗服务的明显失误:安全事故影响了12.3%在克罗地亚儿童医疗中心的急诊科接受治疗的儿童,其中78.6%是可以预防的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Neutrophil CD64 expression increases in infants aged less than 3 months with fever without source: pilot study in the paediatric emergency care setting. Physical, social, and emotional impact on patients with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization. If triage works, the ED works. Oral blistering mucositis in adolescent. Metabolopathy with characteristic clinical triad: Sengers syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1