Historical and contemporary climate jointly determine angiosperm plant diversity patterns across east Eurasia

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ecography Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07062
Wenqi Song, Yichao Li, Ao Luo, Xiangyan Su, Qinggang Wang, Yunpeng Liu, Tong Lyu, Yongsheng Chen, Shijia Peng, Denis Sandanov, Zhiheng Wang
{"title":"Historical and contemporary climate jointly determine angiosperm plant diversity patterns across east Eurasia","authors":"Wenqi Song,&nbsp;Yichao Li,&nbsp;Ao Luo,&nbsp;Xiangyan Su,&nbsp;Qinggang Wang,&nbsp;Yunpeng Liu,&nbsp;Tong Lyu,&nbsp;Yongsheng Chen,&nbsp;Shijia Peng,&nbsp;Denis Sandanov,&nbsp;Zhiheng Wang","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mechanisms underlying large-scale spatial patterns of species richness are one of the central issues in ecology. Although contemporary climate, evolutionary history, and historical climate change have been proposed as drivers of species richness patterns, variation in the relative importance of different factors remains a major challenge. Here, using newly compiled distribution data with a spatial resolution of 100 × 100 km for 43 023 angiosperms plant species in east Eurasia, we mapped species richness patterns for plants with different growth forms (i.e. woody versus herbaceous) and range sizes (i.e. wide-ranged versus narrow-ranged species), and compared the relative importance of the four hypotheses in explaining these patterns, i.e. freezing tolerance hypothesis, historical climate change hypothesis, Janzen's hypothesis (predicting that climate seasonality and topography determine species richness patterns), and diversification rate hypothesis. We found that species richness of all angiosperm plants presented a clear latitudinal gradient and was highest in southwestern China and Central Asian mountains. Notably, species richness patterns and their dominant drivers differed between species groups. Historical climate change was the dominant driver for richness patterns of all and herbaceous species. The freezing tolerance hypothesis dominated the drivers for all woody species, while Janzen's hypothesis dominated narrow-ranged woody and herbaceous species. Our study suggests that different hypotheses contribute to large-scale plant richness patterns via their effects on different plant groups. Our results did not support the diversification rate hypothesis, but demonstrated the high importance of historical climate change to plant diversity in east Eurasia, providing new perspectives on the mechanisms of plant diversity patterns in this continent.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2024 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07062","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanisms underlying large-scale spatial patterns of species richness are one of the central issues in ecology. Although contemporary climate, evolutionary history, and historical climate change have been proposed as drivers of species richness patterns, variation in the relative importance of different factors remains a major challenge. Here, using newly compiled distribution data with a spatial resolution of 100 × 100 km for 43 023 angiosperms plant species in east Eurasia, we mapped species richness patterns for plants with different growth forms (i.e. woody versus herbaceous) and range sizes (i.e. wide-ranged versus narrow-ranged species), and compared the relative importance of the four hypotheses in explaining these patterns, i.e. freezing tolerance hypothesis, historical climate change hypothesis, Janzen's hypothesis (predicting that climate seasonality and topography determine species richness patterns), and diversification rate hypothesis. We found that species richness of all angiosperm plants presented a clear latitudinal gradient and was highest in southwestern China and Central Asian mountains. Notably, species richness patterns and their dominant drivers differed between species groups. Historical climate change was the dominant driver for richness patterns of all and herbaceous species. The freezing tolerance hypothesis dominated the drivers for all woody species, while Janzen's hypothesis dominated narrow-ranged woody and herbaceous species. Our study suggests that different hypotheses contribute to large-scale plant richness patterns via their effects on different plant groups. Our results did not support the diversification rate hypothesis, but demonstrated the high importance of historical climate change to plant diversity in east Eurasia, providing new perspectives on the mechanisms of plant diversity patterns in this continent.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史和当代气候共同决定了欧亚大陆东部的被子植物多样性模式
物种丰富度的大尺度空间模式的内在机制是生态学的核心问题之一。尽管当代气候、进化史和历史气候变化被认为是物种丰富度模式的驱动因素,但不同因素相对重要性的变化仍然是一个重大挑战。在此,我们利用最新编制的欧亚大陆东部 43 023 个被子植物物种的空间分辨率为 100 × 100 km 的分布数据,绘制了不同生长形式(即木本植物与草本植物)和分布范围大小(即宽分布范围物种与窄分布范围物种)的植物物种丰富度模式图。并比较了四种假说(即耐寒假说、历史气候变化假说、Janzen 假说(预测气候季节性和地形决定物种丰富度模式)和多样化率假说)在解释这些模式时的相对重要性。我们发现,所有被子植物的物种丰富度都呈现出明显的纬度梯度,并且以中国西南部和中亚山区的物种丰富度最高。值得注意的是,不同物种群之间的物种丰富度模式及其主要驱动因素各不相同。历史气候变化是所有物种和草本植物物种丰富度模式的主要驱动因素。耐冻假说是所有木本物种的主要驱动因素,而 Janzen 假说则是范围较窄的木本和草本物种的主要驱动因素。我们的研究表明,不同的假说通过对不同植物类群的影响,促成了大规模的植物丰富度模式。我们的研究结果不支持多样化率假说,但证明了历史气候变化对欧亚大陆东部植物多样性的高度重要性,为研究该大陆植物多样性模式的机制提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
期刊最新文献
An invasive pathogen generally contracts species to their niche cores, not margins Drivers of amphibian species richness in European ponds Testing the abundant centre hypothesis in a seabird: higher energy expenditure at the wintering range centre does not reduce reproductive success Deep-sea food-web structure at South Sandwich Islands (Southern Ocean): net primary production as a main driver for interannual changes Resource redistribution mediated by hydrological connectivity modulates vegetation response to aridification in drylands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1