A feature-specific prediction error model explains dopaminergic heterogeneity

IF 21.2 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Nature neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1038/s41593-024-01689-1
Rachel S. Lee, Yotam Sagiv, Ben Engelhard, Ilana B. Witten, Nathaniel D. Daw
{"title":"A feature-specific prediction error model explains dopaminergic heterogeneity","authors":"Rachel S. Lee, Yotam Sagiv, Ben Engelhard, Ilana B. Witten, Nathaniel D. Daw","doi":"10.1038/s41593-024-01689-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hypothesis that midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons broadcast a reward prediction error (RPE) is among the great successes of computational neuroscience. However, recent results contradict a core aspect of this theory: specifically that the neurons convey a scalar, homogeneous signal. While the predominant family of extensions to the RPE model replicates the classic model in multiple parallel circuits, we argue that these models are ill suited to explain reports of heterogeneity in task variable encoding across DA neurons. Instead, we introduce a complementary ‘feature-specific RPE’ model, positing that individual ventral tegmental area DA neurons report RPEs for different aspects of an animal’s moment-to-moment situation. Further, we show how our framework can be extended to explain patterns of heterogeneity in action responses reported among substantia nigra pars compacta DA neurons. This theory reconciles new observations of DA heterogeneity with classic ideas about RPE coding while also providing a new perspective of how the brain performs reinforcement learning in high-dimensional environments. The authors present a feature-specific prediction error model that explains heterogeneity in dopaminergic signals within and across projection-defined populations. Model-derived predictions of dopamine activity align with empirical recordings.","PeriodicalId":19076,"journal":{"name":"Nature neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":21.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-024-01689-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hypothesis that midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons broadcast a reward prediction error (RPE) is among the great successes of computational neuroscience. However, recent results contradict a core aspect of this theory: specifically that the neurons convey a scalar, homogeneous signal. While the predominant family of extensions to the RPE model replicates the classic model in multiple parallel circuits, we argue that these models are ill suited to explain reports of heterogeneity in task variable encoding across DA neurons. Instead, we introduce a complementary ‘feature-specific RPE’ model, positing that individual ventral tegmental area DA neurons report RPEs for different aspects of an animal’s moment-to-moment situation. Further, we show how our framework can be extended to explain patterns of heterogeneity in action responses reported among substantia nigra pars compacta DA neurons. This theory reconciles new observations of DA heterogeneity with classic ideas about RPE coding while also providing a new perspective of how the brain performs reinforcement learning in high-dimensional environments. The authors present a feature-specific prediction error model that explains heterogeneity in dopaminergic signals within and across projection-defined populations. Model-derived predictions of dopamine activity align with empirical recordings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特定特征预测误差模型可解释多巴胺能异质性
中脑多巴胺(DA)神经元播报奖赏预测错误(RPE)的假说是计算神经科学的伟大成就之一。然而,最近的研究结果却与这一理论的核心内容相矛盾:具体来说,神经元传递的是一种标量、同质的信号。虽然 RPE 模型的主要扩展系列在多个并行电路中复制了经典模型,但我们认为这些模型并不适合解释有关 DA 神经元任务变量编码异质性的报告。相反,我们引入了一个互补的 "特异性 RPE "模型,假设单个腹侧被盖区 DA 神经元针对动物瞬间情况的不同方面报告 RPE。此外,我们还展示了如何扩展我们的框架,以解释黑质紧密区 DA 神经元报告的动作反应的异质性模式。这一理论调和了对 DA 异质性的新观察和有关 RPE 编码的经典观点,同时也为大脑如何在高维环境中进行强化学习提供了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature neuroscience
Nature neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
38.60
自引率
1.20%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Neuroscience, a multidisciplinary journal, publishes papers of the utmost quality and significance across all realms of neuroscience. The editors welcome contributions spanning molecular, cellular, systems, and cognitive neuroscience, along with psychophysics, computational modeling, and nervous system disorders. While no area is off-limits, studies offering fundamental insights into nervous system function receive priority. The journal offers high visibility to both readers and authors, fostering interdisciplinary communication and accessibility to a broad audience. It maintains high standards of copy editing and production, rigorous peer review, rapid publication, and operates independently from academic societies and other vested interests. In addition to primary research, Nature Neuroscience features news and views, reviews, editorials, commentaries, perspectives, book reviews, and correspondence, aiming to serve as the voice of the global neuroscience community.
期刊最新文献
Synergistic association of Aβ and tau pathology with cortical neurophysiology and cognitive decline in asymptomatic older adults A cell-autonomous role for border-associated macrophages in ApoE4 neurovascular dysfunction and susceptibility to white matter injury Inhibiting Ca2+ channels in Alzheimer’s disease model mice relaxes pericytes, improves cerebral blood flow and reduces immune cell stalling and hypoxia Semi-orthogonal subspaces for value mediate a binding and generalization trade-off Tonic and burst-like locus coeruleus stimulation distinctly shift network activity across the cortical hierarchy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1