L Onyiriuka, J M Aliaga-Arias, S Patel, A Khan, K Ashkan, R Gullan, R Bhangoo, A Ahmed, G Grahovac, F Vergani, A Kailaya-Vasan, J P Lavrador
{"title":"Identifying functional cortical plasticity after spinal tumour resection using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.","authors":"L Onyiriuka, J M Aliaga-Arias, S Patel, A Khan, K Ashkan, R Gullan, R Bhangoo, A Ahmed, G Grahovac, F Vergani, A Kailaya-Vasan, J P Lavrador","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) brain mapping to characterise preoperative motor impairment caused by an intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumour and postoperative cortical functional reorganisation. Preoperative and 1-year follow-up clinical, radiological and nTMS data from a case of thoracic spinal meningioma that underwent surgical resection of the lesion were collected and compared. A 67-year-old patient presented with severe progressive thoracic myelopathy (hypertonic paraparesis, clonus, insensate urinary retention) secondary to an IDEM tumour. Initial nTMS assessment showed bilateral upper limb representation with no positive responses for both lower limbs. He underwent successful surgical resection for his IDEM (meningioma WHO grade 1). At 1-year follow-up, the patient's gait was improved and his bladder function normalised. nTMS documented positive responses for both upper and lower limbs and a decrease in the area (right side: 1.01 vs 0.39cm<sup>2</sup>; left side: 1.92 vs 0.81cm<sup>2</sup>) and volume (right side: 344.2 vs 42.4uVcm<sup>2</sup>; left side: 467.1 vs 119uVcm<sup>2</sup>) of cortical activation for both upper limbs, suggesting a functional reorganisation of the motor areas after tumour resection. nTMS motor mapping and derived metrics can characterise preoperative motor deficit and cortical plasticity during follow-up after IDEM resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) brain mapping to characterise preoperative motor impairment caused by an intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumour and postoperative cortical functional reorganisation. Preoperative and 1-year follow-up clinical, radiological and nTMS data from a case of thoracic spinal meningioma that underwent surgical resection of the lesion were collected and compared. A 67-year-old patient presented with severe progressive thoracic myelopathy (hypertonic paraparesis, clonus, insensate urinary retention) secondary to an IDEM tumour. Initial nTMS assessment showed bilateral upper limb representation with no positive responses for both lower limbs. He underwent successful surgical resection for his IDEM (meningioma WHO grade 1). At 1-year follow-up, the patient's gait was improved and his bladder function normalised. nTMS documented positive responses for both upper and lower limbs and a decrease in the area (right side: 1.01 vs 0.39cm2; left side: 1.92 vs 0.81cm2) and volume (right side: 344.2 vs 42.4uVcm2; left side: 467.1 vs 119uVcm2) of cortical activation for both upper limbs, suggesting a functional reorganisation of the motor areas after tumour resection. nTMS motor mapping and derived metrics can characterise preoperative motor deficit and cortical plasticity during follow-up after IDEM resection.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November.
The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.