Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A scoping review of genomics education needs assessments and evaluations.

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY American journal of human genetics Pub Date : 2024-08-08 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.06.005
Amy Nisselle, Bronwyn Terrill, Monika Janinski, Sylvia Metcalfe, Clara Gaff
{"title":"Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A scoping review of genomics education needs assessments and evaluations.","authors":"Amy Nisselle, Bronwyn Terrill, Monika Janinski, Sylvia Metcalfe, Clara Gaff","doi":"10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A health workforce capable of implementing genomic medicine requires effective genomics education. Genomics education interventions developed for health professions over the last two decades, and their impact, are variably described in the literature. To inform an evaluation framework for genomics education, we undertook an exploratory scoping review of published needs assessments for, and/or evaluations of, genomics education interventions for health professionals from 2000 to 2023. We retrieved and screened 4,659 records across the two searches with 363 being selected for full-text review and consideration by an interdisciplinary working group. 104 articles were selected for inclusion in the review-60 needs assessments, 52 genomics education evaluations, and eight describing both. Included articles spanned all years and described education interventions in over 30 countries. Target audiences included medical specialists, nurses/midwives, and/or allied health professionals. Evaluation questions, outcomes, and measures were extracted, categorized, and tabulated to iteratively compare measures across stages of genomics education evaluation: planning (pre-implementation), development and delivery (implementation), and impact (immediate, intermediate, or long-term outcomes). They are presented here along with descriptions of study designs. We document the wide variability in evaluation approaches and terminology used to define measures and note that few articles considered downstream (long-term) outcomes of genomics education interventions. Alongside the evaluation framework for genomics education, results from this scoping review form part of a toolkit to help educators to undertake rigorous genomics evaluation that is fit for purpose and can contribute to the growing evidence base of the contribution of genomics education in implementation strategies for genomic medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7659,"journal":{"name":"American journal of human genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1508-1523"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of human genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.06.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A health workforce capable of implementing genomic medicine requires effective genomics education. Genomics education interventions developed for health professions over the last two decades, and their impact, are variably described in the literature. To inform an evaluation framework for genomics education, we undertook an exploratory scoping review of published needs assessments for, and/or evaluations of, genomics education interventions for health professionals from 2000 to 2023. We retrieved and screened 4,659 records across the two searches with 363 being selected for full-text review and consideration by an interdisciplinary working group. 104 articles were selected for inclusion in the review-60 needs assessments, 52 genomics education evaluations, and eight describing both. Included articles spanned all years and described education interventions in over 30 countries. Target audiences included medical specialists, nurses/midwives, and/or allied health professionals. Evaluation questions, outcomes, and measures were extracted, categorized, and tabulated to iteratively compare measures across stages of genomics education evaluation: planning (pre-implementation), development and delivery (implementation), and impact (immediate, intermediate, or long-term outcomes). They are presented here along with descriptions of study designs. We document the wide variability in evaluation approaches and terminology used to define measures and note that few articles considered downstream (long-term) outcomes of genomics education interventions. Alongside the evaluation framework for genomics education, results from this scoping review form part of a toolkit to help educators to undertake rigorous genomics evaluation that is fit for purpose and can contribute to the growing evidence base of the contribution of genomics education in implementation strategies for genomic medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确保基因组学教育的最佳实践:基因组学教育需求评估和评价范围审查。
一支能够实施基因组医学的医疗队伍需要有效的基因组学教育。文献中对过去二十年中为卫生专业开发的基因组学教育干预措施及其影响的描述各不相同。为了为基因组学教育的评估框架提供信息,我们对 2000 年至 2023 年间已发表的卫生专业人员基因组学教育干预措施的需求评估和/或评估进行了探索性范围审查。在两次检索中,我们检索并筛选了 4659 条记录,其中有 363 条被选中进行全文审阅,并由跨学科工作组进行审议。104 篇文章被选中纳入审查,其中 60 篇为需求评估,52 篇为基因组学教育评估,8 篇同时描述了这两种情况。纳入的文章跨越各个年份,介绍了 30 多个国家的教育干预措施。目标受众包括医学专家、护士/助产士和/或专职医疗人员。对评估问题、结果和衡量标准进行了提取、分类和制表,以反复比较基因组学教育评估各阶段的衡量标准:规划(实施前)、开发和交付(实施)以及影响(即时、中期或长期结果)。本文对这些指标进行了介绍,并对研究设计进行了说明。我们记录了评估方法和用于定义衡量标准的术语的巨大差异,并注意到很少有文章考虑基因组学教育干预措施的下游(长期)结果。除了基因组学教育评估框架之外,本范围综述的结果还构成了工具包的一部分,可帮助教育者进行严格的基因组学评估,使其符合目的,并能为基因组学教育在基因组医学实施策略中的贡献这一不断增长的证据基础做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
4.10%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Human Genetics (AJHG) is a monthly journal published by Cell Press, chosen by The American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) as its premier publication starting from January 2008. AJHG represents Cell Press's first society-owned journal, and both ASHG and Cell Press anticipate significant synergies between AJHG content and that of other Cell Press titles.
期刊最新文献
Demographic history and genetic variation of the Armenian population. Primary cartilage transcriptional signatures reflect cell-type-specific molecular pathways underpinning osteoarthritis. The PRIMED Consortium: Reducing disparities in polygenic risk assessment. The methylomic landscape of human articular cartilage development contains epigenetic signatures of osteoarthritis risk. Comparative analysis of predicted DNA secondary structures infers complex human centromere topology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1