Cultural Tailoring and Targeting of Messages: A Systematic Literature Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2369340
Maria Knight Lapinski, John G Oetzel, Sunyoung Park, Amanda J Williamson
{"title":"Cultural Tailoring and Targeting of Messages: A Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Maria Knight Lapinski, John G Oetzel, Sunyoung Park, Amanda J Williamson","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2369340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cultural targeting and tailoring are different, yet they remain intertwined in the literature inhibiting theory development and limiting the possibility of determining their effects. This preregistered systematic literature review describes these constructs and provides a framework for cultural tailoring with evidence from a review of 63 studies, published from 2010 to 2020, to characterize the processes, elements, and theories used in the existing literature. The results show that 86% of studies self-defined as cultural tailoring, but coding revealed relatively few tailoring studies (25%) with 31% including both tailoring and targeting elements. Most studies used outreach and consultation as processes for tailoring or targeting with participatory approaches used in a fifth of the studies. Surface-level features of message content were commonly used to tailor or target with deep-cultural-values found in only a quarter of the studies. We argue from theories of communication accommodation and persuasion that cultural tailoring or targeting may provide gains in attention, recall, or source evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2369340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural targeting and tailoring are different, yet they remain intertwined in the literature inhibiting theory development and limiting the possibility of determining their effects. This preregistered systematic literature review describes these constructs and provides a framework for cultural tailoring with evidence from a review of 63 studies, published from 2010 to 2020, to characterize the processes, elements, and theories used in the existing literature. The results show that 86% of studies self-defined as cultural tailoring, but coding revealed relatively few tailoring studies (25%) with 31% including both tailoring and targeting elements. Most studies used outreach and consultation as processes for tailoring or targeting with participatory approaches used in a fifth of the studies. Surface-level features of message content were commonly used to tailor or target with deep-cultural-values found in only a quarter of the studies. We argue from theories of communication accommodation and persuasion that cultural tailoring or targeting may provide gains in attention, recall, or source evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息的文化定制和针对性:系统性文献综述。
文化定位和量身定制是不同的,但它们在文献中仍然交织在一起,阻碍了理论的发展,限制了确定其效果的可能性。这篇预先登记的系统性文献综述描述了这些概念,并通过对 2010 年至 2020 年间发表的 63 项研究的综述,提供了文化定制的框架,以描述现有文献中使用的过程、要素和理论。结果表明,86% 的研究自我定义为文化定制,但编码显示定制研究相对较少(25%),31% 的研究既包括定制元素,也包括目标元素。大多数研究将外联和咨询作为量身定制或定位的过程,五分之一的研究采用了参与式方法。信息内容的表层特征通常被用于定制或定位,而深层文化价值仅出现在四分之一的研究中。我们从传播适应性和说服理论出发,认为文化定制或定位可能会提高注意力、记忆力或信息源评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
When Fears Come True: An Experimental Approximation of Patient Comprehension During Initial Cancer Diagnoses. Mobile Patient-Provider Communication and Lifestyle Improvement: Examining the Role of Mobile Technology Identity and Health Empowerment. The Effect of Social Media Influencer Warranting Cues on Intentions to Use Non-Hormonal Contraception. Health-Related Communication of Social Media Influencers: A Scoping Review. Discourse Analysis in End-of-Life Communication: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1