Positive predictive value and sensitivity of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Register

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Thrombosis research Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109074
Thure Filskov Overvad , Marianne Tang Severinsen , Søren Paaske Johnsen , Susanne Storm Madsen , Karina Kannik , Louise Gundel Stenfeldt , Torben Bjerregaard Larsen , Peter Brønnum Nielsen
{"title":"Positive predictive value and sensitivity of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Register","authors":"Thure Filskov Overvad ,&nbsp;Marianne Tang Severinsen ,&nbsp;Søren Paaske Johnsen ,&nbsp;Susanne Storm Madsen ,&nbsp;Karina Kannik ,&nbsp;Louise Gundel Stenfeldt ,&nbsp;Torben Bjerregaard Larsen ,&nbsp;Peter Brønnum Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Hospital discharge diagnoses from administrative registries are frequently used in studies of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, but the validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for identifying such events is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Using patient samples from the Danish National Patient Register, we calculated positive predictive values (PPV), i.e., the proportion of registered ICD codes, which could be confirmed after manual search of the electronic health record. Sensitivity was estimated in a sample of patients with imaging-verified venous thromboembolism but without prior knowledge about their ICD coding status. Sensitivity was calculated as the proportion of these patients, who were discharged with an ICD code for venous thromboembolism.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall PPV of an ICD-10 diagnosis of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism was 75.9 % (95 % confidence interval 71.3–80.0). In subgroups, the PPV was particularly low for recurrent venous thromboembolism (44.2 %), diagnoses in a secondary position (55.7 %), outpatient diagnoses (65.3 %), and diagnoses given at surgical (66.7 %), emergency wards (48.4 %), or via hospices/palliative teams (0 %).</p><p>The overall sensitivity was 68 %, meaning 32 % of patients with cancer diagnosed in hospital with venous thromboembolism were discharged without any registered ICD code for venous thromboembolism.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The positive predictive value of an ICD diagnosis of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the Danish Patient Register was overall adequate for research purposes, but with notable variation across subgroups. Sensitivity was limited, as 1/3 of patients with venous thromboembolism were discharged without any relevant ICD code. Cautious interpretation of incidence of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism based on administrative register-based data is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384824002068/pdfft?md5=f98fdd7c5fa9ac4d2c272aa74bdebe6e&pid=1-s2.0-S0049384824002068-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384824002068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Hospital discharge diagnoses from administrative registries are frequently used in studies of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, but the validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for identifying such events is unknown.

Materials and methods

Using patient samples from the Danish National Patient Register, we calculated positive predictive values (PPV), i.e., the proportion of registered ICD codes, which could be confirmed after manual search of the electronic health record. Sensitivity was estimated in a sample of patients with imaging-verified venous thromboembolism but without prior knowledge about their ICD coding status. Sensitivity was calculated as the proportion of these patients, who were discharged with an ICD code for venous thromboembolism.

Results

The overall PPV of an ICD-10 diagnosis of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism was 75.9 % (95 % confidence interval 71.3–80.0). In subgroups, the PPV was particularly low for recurrent venous thromboembolism (44.2 %), diagnoses in a secondary position (55.7 %), outpatient diagnoses (65.3 %), and diagnoses given at surgical (66.7 %), emergency wards (48.4 %), or via hospices/palliative teams (0 %).

The overall sensitivity was 68 %, meaning 32 % of patients with cancer diagnosed in hospital with venous thromboembolism were discharged without any registered ICD code for venous thromboembolism.

Conclusions

The positive predictive value of an ICD diagnosis of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the Danish Patient Register was overall adequate for research purposes, but with notable variation across subgroups. Sensitivity was limited, as 1/3 of patients with venous thromboembolism were discharged without any relevant ICD code. Cautious interpretation of incidence of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism based on administrative register-based data is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦全国患者登记册中癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症诊断的阳性预测值和敏感性。
导言:在癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症的研究中,经常会用到行政登记处的出院诊断,但国际疾病分类(ICD)代码在识别此类事件方面的有效性尚不清楚:我们使用丹麦全国患者登记册中的患者样本,计算了阳性预测值(PPV),即经人工搜索电子健康记录后可确认的已登记 ICD 代码的比例。灵敏度是以影像证实患有静脉血栓栓塞但事先不了解其 ICD 编码状况的患者为样本进行估算的。灵敏度按这些患者中出院时带有静脉血栓栓塞症 ICD 编码的比例计算:结果:ICD-10 诊断为癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症的总体 PPV 为 75.9%(95% 置信区间为 71.3-80.0)。在亚组中,复发性静脉血栓栓塞症(44.2%)、辅助诊断(55.7%)、门诊诊断(65.3%)以及手术诊断(66.7%)、急诊病房诊断(48.4%)或通过临终关怀/姑息治疗小组诊断(0%)的 PPV 值尤其低。总体灵敏度为68%,这意味着32%在医院被诊断为静脉血栓栓塞症的癌症患者在出院时没有登记任何静脉血栓栓塞症的ICD代码:丹麦患者登记册》中 ICD 诊断癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症的阳性预测值总体上足以满足研究目的,但在不同亚组中存在明显差异。灵敏度有限,因为三分之一的静脉血栓栓塞症患者出院时没有任何相关的 ICD 代码。基于行政登记数据对癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症发病率的解释应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis research
Thrombosis research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
364
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.
期刊最新文献
The role of anticoagulation on the long-term survival of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: A meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies. Hemophilia A: Economic burden, therapeutic advances, and future forecasts in the Middle East and North Africa region. Limitations of a platelet count-based clinical decision support system to facilitate diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Prothrombin complex concentrate for direct factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding or before urgent surgery. COVID-19 venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1